Literature DB >> 23585271

Prediction of peak overlap in NMR spectra.

Frederik Hefke1, Roland Schmucki, Peter Güntert.   

Abstract

Peak overlap is one of the major factors complicating the analysis of biomolecular NMR spectra. We present a general method for predicting the extent of peak overlap in multidimensional NMR spectra and its validation using both, experimental data sets and Monte Carlo simulation. The method is based on knowledge of the magnetization transfer pathways of the NMR experiments and chemical shift statistics from the Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank. Assuming a normal distribution with characteristic mean value and standard deviation for the chemical shift of each observable atom, an analytic expression was derived for the expected overlap probability of the cross peaks. The analytical approach was verified to agree with the average peak overlap in a large number of individual peak lists simulated using the same chemical shift statistics. The method was applied to eight proteins, including an intrinsically disordered one, for which the prediction results could be compared with the actual overlap based on the experimentally measured chemical shifts. The extent of overlap predicted using only statistical chemical shift information was in good agreement with the overlap that was observed when the measured shifts were used in the virtual spectrum, except for the intrinsically disordered protein. Since the spectral complexity of a protein NMR spectrum is a crucial factor for protein structure determination, analytical overlap prediction can be used to identify potentially difficult proteins before conducting NMR experiments. Overlap predictions can be tailored to particular classes of proteins by preparing statistics from corresponding protein databases. The method is also suitable for optimizing recording parameters and labeling schemes for NMR experiments and improving the reliability of automated spectra analysis and protein structure determination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23585271     DOI: 10.1007/s10858-013-9727-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  24 in total

1.  NMR assignment of the hypothetical ENTH-VHS domain At3g16270 from Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Blanca López-Méndez; David Pantoja-Uceda; Tadashi Tomizawa; Seizo Koshiba; Takanori Kigawa; Mikako Shirouzu; Takaho Terada; Makoto Inoue; Takashi Yabuki; Masaaki Aoki; Eiko Seki; Takayoshi Matsuda; Hiroshi Hirota; Mayumi Yoshida; Akiko Tanaka; Takashi Osanai; Motoaki Seki; Kazuo Shinozaki; Shigeyuki Yokoyama; Peter Güntert
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 2.  SAIL--stereo-array isotope labeling.

Authors:  Masatsune Kainosho; Peter Güntert
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.318

3.  Solution structure of the rhodanese homology domain At4g01050(175-295) from Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  David Pantoja-Uceda; Blanca López-Méndez; Seizo Koshiba; Makoto Inoue; Takanori Kigawa; Takaho Terada; Mikako Shirouzu; Akiko Tanaka; Motoaki Seki; Kazuo Shinozaki; Shigeyuki Yokoyama; Peter Güntert
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Automated combined assignment of NOESY spectra and three-dimensional protein structure determination.

Authors:  C Mumenthaler; P Güntert; W Braun; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA.

Authors:  P Güntert; C Mumenthaler; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-10-17       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Optimization of amino acid type-specific 13C and 15N labeling for the backbone assignment of membrane proteins by solution- and solid-state NMR with the UPLABEL algorithm.

Authors:  Frederik Hefke; Anurag Bagaria; Sina Reckel; Sandra Johanna Ullrich; Volker Dötsch; Clemens Glaubitz; Peter Güntert
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Prion protein NMR structures of chickens, turtles, and frogs.

Authors:  Luigi Calzolai; Dominikus A Lysek; Daniel R Pérez; Peter Güntert; Kurt Wüthrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Assigning large proteins in the solid state: a MAS NMR resonance assignment strategy using selectively and extensively 13C-labelled proteins.

Authors:  Victoria A Higman; Jeremy Flinders; Matthias Hiller; Stefan Jehle; Stefan Markovic; Sebastian Fiedler; Barth-Jan van Rossum; Hartmut Oschkinat
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  NMR assignments for a helical 40 kDa membrane protein.

Authors:  Kirill Oxenoid; Hak Jun Kim; Jaison Jacob; Frank D Sönnichsen; Charles R Sanders
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  BioMagResBank.

Authors:  Eldon L Ulrich; Hideo Akutsu; Jurgen F Doreleijers; Yoko Harano; Yannis E Ioannidis; Jundong Lin; Miron Livny; Steve Mading; Dimitri Maziuk; Zachary Miller; Eiichi Nakatani; Christopher F Schulte; David E Tolmie; R Kent Wenger; Hongyang Yao; John L Markley
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-04       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.