OBJECTIVE: This article describes the characteristics and early implementation experiences of community behavioral health agencies that received Primary and Behavioral Health Care Integration (PBHCI) grants from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration to integrate primary care into programs for adults with serious mental illness. METHODS: Data were collected from 56 programs, across 26 states, that received PBHCI grants in 2009 (N=13) or 2010 (N=43). The authors systematically extracted quantitative and qualitative information about program characteristics from grantee proposals and semistructured telephone interviews with core program staff. Quarterly reports submitted by grantees were coded to identify barriers to implementing integrated care. RESULTS: Grantees shared core features required by the grant but varied widely in terms of characteristics of the organization, such as size and location, and in the way services were integrated, such as through partnerships with a primary care agency. Barriers to program implementation at start-up included difficulty recruiting and retaining qualified staff and issues related to data collection and use of electronic health records, licensing and approvals, and physical space. By the end of the first year, some problems, such as space issues, were largely resolved, but other issues, including problems with staffing and data collection, remained. New challenges, such as patient recruitment, had emerged. CONCLUSIONS: Early implementation experiences of PBHCI grantees may inform other programs that seek to integrate primary care into behavioral health settings as part of new, large-scale government initiatives, such as specialty mental health homes.
OBJECTIVE: This article describes the characteristics and early implementation experiences of community behavioral health agencies that received Primary and Behavioral Health Care Integration (PBHCI) grants from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration to integrate primary care into programs for adults with serious mental illness. METHODS: Data were collected from 56 programs, across 26 states, that received PBHCI grants in 2009 (N=13) or 2010 (N=43). The authors systematically extracted quantitative and qualitative information about program characteristics from grantee proposals and semistructured telephone interviews with core program staff. Quarterly reports submitted by grantees were coded to identify barriers to implementing integrated care. RESULTS: Grantees shared core features required by the grant but varied widely in terms of characteristics of the organization, such as size and location, and in the way services were integrated, such as through partnerships with a primary care agency. Barriers to program implementation at start-up included difficulty recruiting and retaining qualified staff and issues related to data collection and use of electronic health records, licensing and approvals, and physical space. By the end of the first year, some problems, such as space issues, were largely resolved, but other issues, including problems with staffing and data collection, remained. New challenges, such as patient recruitment, had emerged. CONCLUSIONS: Early implementation experiences of PBHCI grantees may inform other programs that seek to integrate primary care into behavioral health settings as part of new, large-scale government initiatives, such as specialty mental health homes.
Authors: Melinda M Davis; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Maribel Cifuentes; Jennifer Hall; Rose Gunn; Douglas Fernald; Emma Gilchrist; Benjamin F Miller; Frank DeGruy; Deborah J Cohen Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2015 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Emma E McGinty; Alene Kennedy-Hendricks; Sarah Linden; Seema Choksy; Elizabeth Stone; Gail L Daumit Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2017-12-16 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Christina Mangurian; Chelsea Modlin; Lindsey Williams; Susan Essock; Nicholas S Riano; Martha Shumway; John W Newcomer; James W Dilley; Dean Schillinger Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2017-11-28
Authors: Ruth S Shim; Cathy Lally; Rebecca Farley; Chuck Ingoglia; Benjamin G Druss Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Heather Farb; Katie Sacca; Margaret Variano; Lisa Gentry; Meagan Relle; Jane Bertrand Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Deborah M Scharf; Nicole K Eberhart; Nicole Schmidt Hackbarth; Marcela Horvitz-Lennon; Robin Beckman; Bing Han; Susan L Lovejoy; Harold Alan Pincus; M Audrey Burnam Journal: Rand Health Q Date: 2014-12-30