Literature DB >> 23584439

Hematopoietic SCT in Europe: data and trends in 2011.

J R Passweg1, H Baldomero, M Bregni, S Cesaro, P Dreger, R F Duarte, J H F Falkenburg, N Kröger, D Farge-Bancel, H Bobby Gaspar, J Marsh, M Mohty, C Peters, A Sureda, A Velardi, C Ruiz de Elvira, A Madrigal.   

Abstract

In all, 651 from 680 centers in 48 countries reported 35 660 hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) in 32 075 patients (13 470 allogeneic (42%), 18 605 autologous (58%)) to the 2011 survey. Main indications were: leukemias; 10 113 (32%; 94% allogeneic); lymphoid neoplasias; non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, plasma cell disorders; 18 433 (57%; 12% allogeneic); solid tumours; 1573 (5%; 5% allogeneic); and non-malignant disorders; 1830 (6%; 92% allogeneic). There were more unrelated donors than HLA identical sibling donors (54% versus 39%); proportion of peripheral blood as stem cell source was 99% for autologous and 73% for allogeneic HSCT. Cord blood was only used in allogeneic transplants (6% of total). In the past 10 years, the overall number of transplants has increased by 53%. Allogeneic HSCT have doubled (from 7272 to 14 549) while, autologous have increased by 32% and continue to increase by about 1100 HSCT per year since 2001. In the past 2 years, an increase of >2000 HSCT per year was seen. Transplant activity is shown by team size. For allogeneic HSCT, we show use of reduced-intensity conditioning versus myeloablative conditioning across Europe and use of post-transplant donor lymphocyte infusions with considerable variation across different countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23584439      PMCID: PMC3763517          DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2013.51

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


Introduction

Hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) is an established procedure for many acquired and congenital disorders of the hematopoietic system.[1, 2, 3, 4] Forecasts predict an on-going increase in HSCT in the near future. The annual activity survey, describing the status of HSCT in Europe, has become an instrument used to observe trends and to monitor changes in technology use.[5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] The survey captures the numbers of HSCT performed in the preceding year from each participating team, split by indication, donor type and stem cell source. The standardized structure of the survey over many years and the excellent commitment by the participating teams allows us to observe changes over time and to evaluate factors associated with such changes. More recently, the survey has included information on cellular transplants with hematopoietic stem cells for non-hematopoietic use, as well as on the use of non-hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.[11] This coincides with the recent interest of the World Health Organization (www.who.org) in cell and tissue transplants and further stresses the need for adequate and timely information.[12] The European Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) analyses in previous years have shown an increase in the annual absolute HSCT numbers and transplant rates (number of HSCT/10 million inhabitants) of about 4–13% (median 8%) for allogeneic and of 1.5–9.5% (median 4%) for autologous HSCT. This report is based on the 2011 survey data. In addition to transplant rates and indications, stem cell source and donor type in allogeneic HSCT, we provide data on proportions of transplants done in low, intermediate and high transplanting centers and data on important differences among countries in the use of reduced intensity (RIC) versus myeloablative conditioning and in the use of DLI post transplant for recipients of allogeneic HSCT.

Patients and methods

Data collection and validation

Participating teams were requested to report data for 2011 by indication, stem cell source and donor type as listed in Table 1. Quality control measures included several independent systems: confirmation of validity of the entered data by the reporting team, selective comparison of the survey data with MED-A data sets in the EBMT Registry database, cross-checking with the National Registries and onsite visits of selected teams.
Table 1

Numbers of hematopoietic SCTs in Europe 2011 by indication, donor type and stem cell source

 HLA-identical sibling
Mis-matched relative
Unrelated
Autologous
Total
 BMPBCBBMPBCBBMPBCBBMPBAllogeneicAutologous
Leukemias7562880815131248414016503286149471642
 AML3161417476163 3021897230254824405507
  Early disease23097423080 182991120204132609433
  Advanced disease8644324683 120906110569179674
 ALL283585344903306619164175209776
  Early disease179403 1938 17038278155126956
  Advanced disease10418232552313623786 2082820
 CML38118 31312917316 13911
  Early disease2342 17 15696  163 
  Advanced disease1576 2611410410 12281
 Myelodysplastic disorders98464 2037 16086675113172014
 Myeloproliferative disorders11114152 1819310  354 
 CLL10182 37 26268814350444
              
Lymphoproliferative disorders80783 5450 1011001667516 223213516 298
 Plasma cell—myeloma25219 210 29280131583265788341
 Plasma cell—other210    1173 24533245
 Hodgkin's lymphoma11140 3114 15134132120453582066
 Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma42414 2126 565703739560711665646
              
Solid tumors98 140 853661433741499
 Neuroblastoma61  23 4233140239433
 Soft tissue sarcoma 1  7 11 4371041
 Germinal tumors 1       43511355
 Breast cancer 1        54154
 Ewing12 14 12 921111220
 Other solid tumors22  6 2  1837812396
              
Non-malignant disorders57726037751071311187137111271692138
 BM failure—SAA20013031119 1288222  595 
 BM failure—other5117466 442412  164 
 Hemoglobinopathies—thalassemia15059112124 21105  301 
 Hemoglobinopathies—other51251054 632  106 
 Primary Immune deficiencies88206263817553566536311
 Inherited disorders of  Metabolism3473615 321237441468
 Auto immune disease32  1 533111817119
              
Others2810125 142612 289828
              
Total Patients145039414628351451275523572118018 42513 47018 605
Additional transplants44286 43137155453606250010792506
Total Transplants149442274632665161330568878118620 92514 54921 111

Abbreviations: CB=cord blood; PB=peripheral blood; SAA=severe aplastic anemia.

Teams

A total of 680 centers from 48 countries were contacted for the 2011 survey (39 European and 9 affiliated countries); of which 651 teams from 46 countries (37 European, 9 affiliated countries) reported their numbers. This corresponds to a 96% return rate and includes 537 active EBMT member teams. Fourteen active teams failed to report in 2011 while 15 teams reported no activity due to transplant program development or closure. Contacted teams are listed in the appendix in alphabetical order by country, city, EBMT center code, with their reported numbers of first and total HSCT and of first allogeneic and autologous HSCT. The WHO regional office definitions (www.who.org) were used to classify countries as European or Non-European. According to information received, there were no blood or marrow transplants performed in Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Georgia, Liechtenstein, Malta, Moldavia, Monaco, Montenegro and San Marino in 2011. Nine non-European countries participated in the 2011 EBMT survey: Algeria, Iran, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, South Africa and Tunisia. Their data, 6% of the total data set, are included in all the analyses.

Definitions

Patient and transplant numbers

Wherever appropriate, patient numbers corresponding to the number of patients receiving a first transplant and transplant numbers reflecting the total number of transplants performed are listed. Multiple transplants may include multiple transplants defined as subsequent transplants within a planned double or triple autologous or allogeneic transplant protocol, and retransplants (autologous or allogeneic) defined as unplanned HSCT for rejection or relapse after a previous HSCT. Information on stem cell source includes BM, peripheral blood or cord blood; transplants with more than one source were categorized as cord blood HSCT if cord blood was present or peripheral blood HSCT if BM and peripheral blood were used. Information on use of RIC transplants, as defined by EBMT, was collected. Information on additional cellular therapies was subdivided into: HSC for non-hematopoietic use; non-hematopoietic stem cell therapies; MSC therapies for rejection or GvHD prevention/treatment; and donor lymphocyte infusions. Collection of information was harmonized with similar surveys carried out by EULAR (European League against Rheumatism; www.eular.org) and TERMIS-EU (Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine International Society; www.termis.org).[11]

Transplant rates

Transplant rates, defined as numbers of HSCT per 10 million inhabitants, were computed for each country without adjustments for patients who crossed borders and received their HSCT in a foreign country. Population numbers were obtained from the US census bureau database (http://www.census.gov/population/international/data/idb/rank.php).

Analysis

Wherever appropriate, absolute numbers of transplanted patients or transplants or transplant rates are shown for specific countries, indications or transplant techniques. Team size was defined as low, intermediate or high based on 1–25, 25–75 and >75 patients transplanted. Team size was defined separately for autologous and allogeneic HSCT. To estimate the percentage of allogeneic HSCT done using a RIC regimen and the percentage of allogeneic HSCT that are followed by a DLI, the transplant years 2008–2011 were averaged and compared across countries. For this comparison, only countries with >100 allogeneic HSCT annually were included.

Results

2011 Data

Participating teams in 2011

Of the 651 teams, 403 (62%) did both allogeneic and autologous transplants; 226 (35%) restricted their activity to autologous HSCT only and 12 teams (2%) to allogeneic transplants only. Ten teams (1%) reported having performed no transplants in 2011. The list of the participating teams can be downloaded as a Supplementary informaton file online.

Numbers of patients and transplants

A total 32 075 patients were transplanted in 2011. Of these, the first transplant for 13 470 (42%) was allogeneic, while the first transplant for 18 605 (58%) was autologous. Furthermore, there were 2073 re-transplants (1018 allogeneic/1055 autologous) and 1512 multiple transplants (61 allogeneic/1451 autologous), bringing the total to 35 660 HSCT procedures, 14 549 allogeneic (41%) and 21 111 autologous (59%) performed in 2011, which is an increase of 7% compared with 2010.[13] Indications for HSCT in 2011 are listed in detail in Table 1 and their distribution is illustrated in Figures 1a and b: allogeneic HSCT and autologous HSCT, respectively. Main indications were lymphoid neoplasias, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma and plasma cell disorders, leukemias, solid tumours and non-malignant disorders. As seen in previous years, the majority of HSCT for lymphoid malignancies were autologous while leukemia is treated more commonly using stem cells from allogeneic donors. Autologous HSCT for non-malignant disorders predominantly include patients with autoimmune disorders.
Figure 1

Absolute numbers and relative proportions of indications for an HSCT in Europe in 2011. (a) Proportions of disease indications for an allogeneic HSCT in Europe in 2011. (b) Proportions of disease indications for an autologous HSCT in Europe in 2011. BMF=bone marrow failure; HD= Hodgkin's disease; IDM=inherited disorders of metabolism; MDS=myelodysplastic syndrome; MPS=myeloproliferative syndrome; NHL=non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; PCD=plasma cell disroder; PID=primary immunodeficiency.

As compared with the previous year, the total number of transplants increased by 6.9% (9% allogeneic HSCT and 5.5% autologous HSCT). The number of unrelated donor transplants increased by 10% from 7098 to 7799.[13] Areas of important changes in transplant activity were an increase in AML first remission allo HSCT by 14%, and in more advanced disease by 9%, and an increase in myelodysplastic syndrome/secondary AML allogeneic HSCT by 20%. Allogeneic HSCT for CLL increased by 24%, there was a decrease of myeloproliferative neoplasm allogeneic HSCT by 26% and for CML not in chronic phase by 11%. In non-malignant diseases, there was an increase in allogeneic HSCT for aplastic anemia by 19%, for thalassemia by 39%, primary immune deficiencies by 10% and in inherited disorders of metabolism by 33%. For autologous transplants, the main increase could be seen for plasma cell disorders (10%) and non-Hodgkin's disorder (3%) while the autoimmune disorders decreased by 20%, but in general, the changes in trends for autologous HSCT were much less dramatic.

Stem cell source and donor type

There were clear differences in the use of stem cell source between autologous and allogeneic HSCT. Of the 21 111 autologous transplants, 186 (1%) were BM derived and 20 925 (99%) were derived from peripheral blood stem cells or from combined peripheral blood and BM. Of the 14 549 allogeneic transplants, 3150 (22%) were BM, 10 566 (72%) were peripheral blood and 833 (6%) were cord blood transplants (Figure 2a). Cord blood was used as the stem cell source for 46 (0.8%) of HLA-identical siblings, 6 (0.6%) from other family members and 781 (10%) of unrelated donors. No autologous cord blood HSCT was reported for 2011. The highest incidence of cord blood transplants from unrelated donors was seen in France, Spain and Italy: 424 (54% of all unrelated cord blood HSCT).
Figure 2

Donor type and stem cell source in allogeneic HSCT. (a) Stem cell source in allogeneic HSCT in 2011. (b) Donor type in allogeneic HSCT in 2011. CB=cord blood.

The choice of stem cell source differed by main indication for all types of allogeneic HSCT. BM remained the preferred source of stem cells for allogeneic transplants for non-malignant disorders (57%). Donors for the 14 549 allogeneic HSCT were HLA-identical siblings (5677 (39%) BM or peripheral blood donors; 46 (0.0.3%) targeted cord blood HSCT), other family members (983; 7%), syngeneic twin donors (44; 0.3%), unrelated BM or peripheral blood donors (7,018; 48%) or unrelated cord blood donors (781; 5%) Figure 2b). The percentage of unrelated donor HSCT continues to increase and has reached 54% of all allogeneic HSCT in 2011.[14]

RIC

Numbers of RIC HSCT continued to increase from 1436 in 2000 to 5567 in 2011 (Figure 3a).[15] RIC conditioning was used for 38% of all allogeneic HSCT, a proportion similar to that of last year's survey. In countries performing >100 allogeneic HSCT per year, the highest percentage of RIC HSCT was seen in the Netherlands (60%). In the United Kingdom, Denmark and France >50% of allogeneic HSCT were performed using RIC but the percentages vary widely with some countries having <20% of transplants done with RIC conditioning (Figure 3b).
Figure 3

RIC in allogeneic HSCT. (a) Absolute numbers of RIC HSCT 2000–2011. (b) Percentage of patients receiving RIC HSCT during the years 2007–2011 in countries performing >100 allogeneic HSCT per year.

Donor lymphocyte infusions

In 1997, 305 patients were reported as having received DLI infusions after transplant; this has increased to 2279 in 2011 and corresponds to 16% of patients with an allogeneic HSCT (Figure 4a). In countries performing >100 HSCT per year, the highest percentage of allogeneic HSCT receiving DLI post transplant can be seen in the Netherlands (32%), with a number of countries in which <5% of transplants are followed by DLI (Figure 4b).
Figure 4

DLI in allogeneic HSCT. (a) Absolute numbers of patients receiving DLI since 1997. (b) Percentage of patients receiving DLI during the years 2007–2011 in countries performing >100 allogeneic HSCT per year.

Additional cellular therapies

In all, 28 teams from 13 countries reported having treated 281 patients with hematopoietic stem cells for non-hematopoietic use in 2011. The main indications were cardiovascular, 190 (all autologous); neurological, 26 (4 autologous); tissue repair, 55 (50 autologous) and epithelial: 10 (9 autologous). In addition, 330 patients in 71 teams and 16 countries received MSCs for prevention/treatment of GvHD (248), prevention/treatment of graft failure (59) and for unspecified reasons (23).

Transplant rates and team size

Transplant rates differed substantially between participating European countries (Figure 5a: allogeneic HSCT; Figure 5b: autologous HSCT). These differences related to all types of HSCT.
Figure 5

Transplant rates in Europe (=total number of HSCT per 10 million inhabitants) by participating country. (a) Allogeneic transplant rates per10 million population in 2011. (b) Autologous transplant rates per 10 million population in 2011.

Transplant rates per 10 million inhabitants for autologous HSCT vary from 14.2 in Ukraine to 519 in Italy, median 151. Transplant rates for allogeneic HSCT vary from either 0 in several countries or 1.3 in Ukraine to 547 in Israel and 380 in Germany, median 109. To illustrate the impact of team size, transplant teams were grouped into low (1–25 HSCT) intermediate (25–75) HSCT and high (more than 75 HSCT) teams separately for autologous and allogeneic procedures. In all, 415 of the 651 teams reporting in 2011 performed an allogeneic HSCT in 2011, 203 teams (49% and 2594 HSCT) reported <25 transplants, 169 teams (41% and 7219 HSCT); 25–75 HSCT and 43 teams (10% and 4736 HSCT) performed >75 HSCT in 2011. Also, 629 of the 651 teams reporting in 2011 performed an autologous HSCT in 2011, 304 teams (48% and 3691 HSCT) reported <25 transplants, 267 teams (43% and 11 643 HSCT); 25–75 HSCT and 58 teams (9% and 5777 HSCT) performed >75 HSCT in 2011. Data are shown in Table 2. It is evident that close to half of the teams fall into the category of low-frequency teams performing <20% of all transplants, be they autologous or allogeneic HSCTs.
Table 2

Numbers of teams and transplants by size category; low, intermediate and high

Team sizeNo. of teamsPercentage of total teamsNo. of HSCTPercentage of total transplantsMedian (range) HSCT per team
Allogeneic
 Low<25 HSCT per team2034925941813 (1–25)
 Intermediate25–75 HSCT per team1694172194940 (26–74)
 High>75 HSCT per team431047363397 (77–287)
Total 415 14 549  
       
Autologous
 Low<25 HSCT per team3044836911812 (1–25)
 Intermediate25–75 HSCT per team26743116435542 (26–74)
 High>75 HSCT per team58957772793 (76–227)
Total 629 21 111  

Abbreviation: HSCT=hematopoietic SCT.

Discussion

The EBMT activity survey has been conducted annually since 1990. The 2010 survey had, for the first time, reported >30 000 patients transplanted in a given year. This trend continues with an additional increase by 7% in 2011. This 2011 report is on 35 660 transplants. HSCT continues to increase for some indications but not for others. Of interest is an important growth of allogeneic HSCT for myelodysplastic syndrome, CLL and for non-malignant disorders, in particular marrow failure and inherited disorders of metabolism. Some indications are decreasing, such as allogeneic transplants for myeloproliferative neoplasias. This is possibly due to the development of new drugs such as janus kinase 2 inhibitors. A success of these drugs may result in decreasing needs for transplant in these diseases similar to the effect the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) had on transplant rates for CML. Of interest, CML was the main indication for allogeneic HSCT in the 1990s, and the highest number of allogeneic HSCT for CML was 1396 in 1999, whereas in 2011 the number of transplants had reduced to 391, which corresponds to 1/4 of the activity before tyrosine kinase inhibitor availability. We show data on the use of RIC for allogeneic HSCT and in the use of DLI after allogeneic HSCT. Of interest is the wide variation in the use of RIC conditioning and of DLI, which varies widely across countries. As we do not know the precise indications for the choice of these interventions, the appropriateness cannot be analyzed. Discrepancies have to be discussed, however, and there appears to be a need for more standardization in the field as differences up to threefold in the use of a given technology must be considered as evidence for uncertainty about appropriate use. Finally, there is a description of 2011 transplants by team size. It is obviously beyond the scope of this paper to discuss in detail appropriateness of decision by health planners on how transplant units are established, but we have to acknowledge the fact that approximately half of the centers fall into the category of low-frequency centers with <25 HSCTs in a given category (allogeneic and autologous HSCTs being analyzed separately) and that these low-frequency centers perform <20% of all HSCTs. In a previous paper by the EBMT activity survey, the relationship between transplant rates and team density have been discussed.[5] The principles of concentrating activity to few centers in order to maintain the highest degrees of team experience and as a consequence better treatment quality, which also needs to be proven, versus the principle of easy access to care, proximity of patients to the nearest transplant center and as a consequence smaller team size, cannot be easily resolved. Last, in spite of the economic crisis in Europe, there does not appear to be a decrease in transplant activity since 2009 but rather a continued annual increase in the use of HSCT technology.
  13 in total

1.  Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a global perspective.

Authors:  Alois Gratwohl; Helen Baldomero; Mahmoud Aljurf; Marcelo C Pasquini; Luis Fernando Bouzas; Ayami Yoshimi; Jeff Szer; Jeff Lipton; Alvin Schwendener; Michael Gratwohl; Karl Frauendorfer; Dietger Niederwieser; Mary Horowitz; Yoshihisa Kodera
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Changes in the use of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a model for diffusion of medical technology.

Authors:  Alois Gratwohl; Alvin Schwendener; Helen Baldomero; Michael Gratwohl; Jane Apperley; Dietger Niederwieser; Karl Frauendorfer
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 3.  Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation.

Authors:  Edward A Copelan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Predictability of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation rates.

Authors:  Alois Gratwohl; Helen Baldomero; Alvin Schwendener; Michael Gratwohl; Jane Apperley; Dietger Niederwieser; Karl Frauendorfer
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  The EBMT activity survey 2007 with focus on allogeneic HSCT for AML and novel cellular therapies.

Authors:  A Gratwohl; H Baldomero; A Schwendener; V Rocha; J Apperley; K Frauendorfer; D Niederwieser
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Hematopoietic-cell transplantation at 50.

Authors:  Frederick R Appelbaum
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The EBMT activity survey: 1990-2010.

Authors:  J R Passweg; H Baldomero; A Gratwohl; M Bregni; S Cesaro; P Dreger; T de Witte; D Farge-Bancel; B Gaspar; J Marsh; M Mohty; C Peters; A Tichelli; A Velardi; C Ruiz de Elvira; F Falkenburg; A Sureda; A Madrigal
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  Monitoring the international use of unrelated donors for transplantation: the WMDA annual reports.

Authors:  L M Foeken; A Green; C K Hurley; E Marry; T Wiegand; M Oudshoorn
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 5.483

9.  Current trends in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Europe.

Authors:  Alois Gratwohl; Helen Baldomero; Bruno Horisberger; Caroline Schmid; Jakob Passweg; Alvaro Urbano-Ispizua
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions.

Authors:  Andrea Bacigalupo; Karen Ballen; Doug Rizzo; Sergio Giralt; Hillard Lazarus; Vincent Ho; Jane Apperley; Shimon Slavin; Marcelo Pasquini; Brenda M Sandmaier; John Barrett; Didier Blaise; Robert Lowski; Mary Horowitz
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  31 in total

1.  Myeloablative conditioning regimens with combined of haploidentical and cord blood transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome patients.

Authors:  P Ke; X-B Bao; X-H Hu; J Zhuang; X-J Wu; Y-J Liu; X-F He; D-P Wu; S-L Xue; X Ma
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 2.  The immune response to cytomegalovirus in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Authors:  Miriam Ciáurriz; Amaya Zabalza; Lorea Beloki; Cristina Mansilla; Estela Pérez-Valderrama; Mercedes Lachén; Eva Bandrés; Eduardo Olavarría; Natalia Ramírez
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation-10 Years of Data From a Developing Country.

Authors:  Natasha Ali; Salman Naseem Adil; Mohammad Usman Shaikh
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 6.940

4.  Unmanipulated haploidentical bone marrow transplantation and post-transplant cyclophosphamide for hematologic malignanices following a myeloablative conditioning: an update.

Authors:  A Bacigalupo; A Dominietto; A Ghiso; C Di Grazia; T Lamparelli; F Gualandi; S Bregante; M T Van Lint; S Geroldi; S Luchetti; R Grasso; S Pozzi; N Colombo; E Tedone; R Varaldo; A M Raiola
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Circulating endothelial cell enumeration demonstrates prolonged endothelial damage in recipients of myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Nick Beije; Jurjen Versluis; Jaco Kraan; Jan W Gratama; Stefan Sleijfer; Jan J Cornelissen
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 6.  The potential of non-myeloablative heterochronous autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for extending a healthy life span.

Authors:  Primož Rožman
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 7.713

7.  Deferrals of volunteer stem cell donors referred for evaluation for matched-unrelated stem cell donation.

Authors:  S Bräuninger; K Thorausch; B Luxembourg; M Schulz; K U Chow; E Seifried; H Bonig
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  Differences in stem cell transplantation activity among regions in Spain: an economic explanation.

Authors:  I Espigado; M Ortega-Ortega; R Montero-Granados; N Rodriguez-Torres; F J Márquez-Malaver
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 9.  Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for MDS and CMML: recommendations from an international expert panel.

Authors:  Theo de Witte; David Bowen; Marie Robin; Luca Malcovati; Dietger Niederwieser; Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha; Ghulam J Mufti; Pierre Fenaux; Guillermo Sanz; Rodrigo Martino; Emilio Paolo Alessandrino; Francesco Onida; Argiris Symeonidis; Jakob Passweg; Guido Kobbe; Arnold Ganser; Uwe Platzbecker; Jürgen Finke; Michel van Gelder; Arjan A van de Loosdrecht; Per Ljungman; Reinhard Stauder; Liisa Volin; H Joachim Deeg; Corey Cutler; Wael Saber; Richard Champlin; Sergio Giralt; Claudio Anasetti; Nicolaus Kröger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Outcomes of autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Nishitha M Reddy; Olalekan Oluwole; John P Greer; Brian G Engelhardt; Madan H Jagasia; Bipin N Savani
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.