Literature DB >> 23584319

Biomechanical comparison of forward and lateral lunges at varying step lengths.

B Riemann1, A Congleton, R Ward, G J Davies.   

Abstract

AIM: Lunges are commonly included in rehabilitation and strength training programs; however limited information regarding differences between lateral and forward lunges with varying step lengths in young adults exists. The current study compared sagittal plane joint kinematics and kinetics between forward and lateral lunges using self-selected and standardized (60% height) step lengths.
METHODS: Thirty-two young adults (16 men, 16 women) completed six lunges of each direction/distance combination while stepping (dominant) limb ankle, knee, and hip peak flexion and net joint extensor moment impulse were quantified.
RESULTS: While lateral direction (P=0.063) step lengths were statistically equal between self-selected and standardized lunges, forward self-selected distances were 10% less than the standardized (P<0.001). Compared to forward lunges, lateral lunge ankle flexion was 83.5% greater (P<0.001) for standard and 55.3% greater (P<0.001) for self-selected distances. Knee flexion was 12.8% greater (P<0.001) during forward lunges compared to lateral lunges, with no significant hip direction differences. Ankle impulse during the lateral lunges was 71.3% greater (P<0.001) compared to forward lunges. Lateral lunge knee impulse was 47.6% greater (P<0.001) for standardized and 16.9% greater (P=0.001) for self-selected distances compared to forward lunges. Forward lunge hip impulse was 64.5% greater for the standardized (P<0.001) and 44.6% greater for self-selected (P<0.001) distances compared to lateral lunges.
CONCLUSION: Forward lunges, particularly using 60% body height step length, appear to place the greatest demands on the hip extensors. Lateral lunges prompted greater ankle flexion and greater ankle and knee extensor kinetic contributions. These data provide rationale for lunge variation selection for young adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23584319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness        ISSN: 0022-4707            Impact factor:   1.637


  5 in total

1.  Biomechanical Differences Between the Bulgarian Split-Squat and Back Squat.

Authors:  Ethan R Mackey; Bryan L Riemann
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-04-01

2.  Influence of Trunk Position during Three Lunge Exercises on Muscular Activation in Trained Women.

Authors:  Ewertton DE S Bezerra; Fernando Diefenthaeler; João Pedro Nunes; Raphael L Sakugawa; Isabel Heberle; Bruno M Moura; Antônio R P Moro; Giuseppe Marcolin; Antonio Paoli
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-04-01

3.  Reliability and minimal detectable change of three functional tests: forward-lunge, step-up-over and sit-to-stand.

Authors:  Carmen Luque-Siles; Tomas Gallego-Izquierdo; Jose Jesus Jímenez-Rejano; Susana Granados de-la-Orden; Gustavo Plaza-Manzano; Africa López-Illescas-Ruiz; Alejandro Ferragut-Garcías; Natalia Romero-Franco; Patricia Martín-Casas; Daniel Pecos-Martín
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-12-27

4.  Assessment of walking disorder in community-dwelling Japanese middle-aged and elderly women using an inertial sensor.

Authors:  Toshinori Miyashita; Shintarou Kudo; Yoshihiro Maekawa
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Weight-Bearing Versus Traditional Strength Assessments of the Hip Musculature.

Authors:  Bret G Freemyer; Anthony Urbi; Trevor Torigoe; Christopher Stickley
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.860

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.