Literature DB >> 23584221

Comparison of the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage in two different planning techniques for stereotactic electrode placement in the deep brain stimulation.

M Piacentino1, G Zambon, M Pilleri, L Bartolomei.   

Abstract

AIM: Intracranial hemorrhage is an infrequent but potentially devastating complication associated with the placement of electrodes for deep brain stimulation (DBS). The objective of this retrospective review is to compare the risk of hemorrhage before and after the introduction of image-guided neuronavigation for the implant of electrodes for DBS.
METHODS: We reviewed all DBS implant performed at our Institute between 1998 and 2010. In 63 of the 106 patients, the targeting was based on ventriculography and merge of CT/MRI. After 2006, in the latter 43 procedures, we introduced targeting based on the merging of angio CT and MRI.. In both implant techniques, microelectrode recording (MER) was used to better define the target. All DBS procedures were performed by a single surgeon (M.P.). Patients had postoperative imaging (MRI or CT) 4-24 h following surgery.
RESULTS: In the group of patients implanted with the first targeting technique, 3 hematomas occurred and all of them solved with sequelae (one residual weakness and two hemiplegias.) After the introduction of neuronavigator, 2 hemorrhages occurred, one solved without sequelae while the second resulted in epileptic seizures.
CONCLUSION: Although the incidence of hemorrhage occurred before and after the use of neuronavigation is the same, the severity is lower in the neuronavigated procedures. Targeting based on the merging of CT angiography and MRI T1/T2 seemed to increase the safety of the lead placement reducing the risk of sequelae related to bleeding. The use of MER was not found to be correlated with an increased hemorrhage rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23584221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Sci        ISSN: 0390-5616            Impact factor:   2.279


  6 in total

Review 1.  Unusual complications of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Fumin Tong; Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora; Lucy Gee; Julie Pilitsis
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Regenerative medicine in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Kevin M Felsenstein; Kate M Candelario; Dennis A Steindler; David R Borchelt
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 7.012

3.  Optimized Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery to Avoid Vascular Damage: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Path Planning for Various Deep Targets by MRI Image Fusion.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Nan Li; Jiaming Li; Huijuan Kou; Jing Wang; Jiangpeng Jing; Mingming Su; Yang Li; Liang Qu; Xuelian Wang
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-07-22

4.  Error Analysis and Some Suggestions on Animal Stereotactic Experiment from Inaccuracy of Rhesus Macaques Atlas.

Authors:  Guan-Yu Zhu; Ying-Chuan Chen; Lin Shi; An-Chao Yang; Yin Jiang; Xin Zhang; Jian-Guo Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Towards unambiguous reporting of complications related to deep brain stimulation surgery: A retrospective single-center analysis and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Katja Engel; Torge Huckhagel; Alessandro Gulberti; Monika Pötter-Nerger; Eik Vettorazzi; Ute Hidding; Chi-Un Choe; Simone Zittel; Hanna Braaß; Peter Ludewig; Miriam Schaper; Kara Krajewski; Christian Oehlwein; Katrin Mittmann; Andreas K Engel; Christian Gerloff; Manfred Westphal; Christian K E Moll; Carsten Buhmann; Johannes A Köppen; Wolfgang Hamel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Experience Reduces Surgical and Hardware-Related Complications of Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: A Single-Center Study of 181 Patients Operated in Six Years.

Authors:  Mehmet Sorar; Sahin Hanalioglu; Bilge Kocer; Muhammed Taha Eser; Selim Selcuk Comoglu; Hayri Kertmen
Journal:  Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2018-07-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.