BACKGROUND: Proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint fusion is a commonly performed procedure for lesser-toe deformities. There are various techniques described to accomplish it. We report the results of PIP joint fusion carried out with an intramedullary fusion device in 150 consecutive toes. The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcomes of PIP joint fusion with this technique. METHOD: A total of 150 toes in 140 consecutive patients who underwent PIP joint fusions of the lesser toes with a StayFuse implant were included in our study. The mean age of the patients was 69.5 years, and the mean follow-up was 18 months. Clinical, radiologic, and subjective evaluations as well as preoperative and postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were carried out. RESULTS: Of the PIP joints, 95.3% were clinically asymptomatic, but the radiologic fusion was 73%. The mean preoperative AOFAS score improved from 22.9 to 81.6 at follow-up. There were implant-related complications in 8 toes. Ninety-five percent of the patients were satisfied with the procedure, and 3.3% of the patients needed revision surgery. CONCLUSION: This technique maintained PIP joint alignment and provided rotational and angular stability with high patient satisfaction and low complication and reoperation rates. We conclude that this is a reproducible technique and an alternative for PIP joint fusions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.
BACKGROUND: Proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint fusion is a commonly performed procedure for lesser-toe deformities. There are various techniques described to accomplish it. We report the results of PIP joint fusion carried out with an intramedullary fusion device in 150 consecutive toes. The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcomes of PIP joint fusion with this technique. METHOD: A total of 150 toes in 140 consecutive patients who underwent PIP joint fusions of the lesser toes with a StayFuse implant were included in our study. The mean age of the patients was 69.5 years, and the mean follow-up was 18 months. Clinical, radiologic, and subjective evaluations as well as preoperative and postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were carried out. RESULTS: Of the PIP joints, 95.3% were clinically asymptomatic, but the radiologic fusion was 73%. The mean preoperative AOFAS score improved from 22.9 to 81.6 at follow-up. There were implant-related complications in 8 toes. Ninety-five percent of the patients were satisfied with the procedure, and 3.3% of the patients needed revision surgery. CONCLUSION: This technique maintained PIP joint alignment and provided rotational and angular stability with high patient satisfaction and low complication and reoperation rates. We conclude that this is a reproducible technique and an alternative for PIP joint fusions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.