BACKGROUND: Over the last 10years the miniaturization of endoscopic instruments made minimally invasive procedures for kidney stones feasible even in children. The evolution in management of kidney stones in a tertiary care center in Europe is reported. METHODS: Patients treated in our hospital for kidney stones from 2002 to 2011 were reviewed and group A (2002 to 2006) was compared with group B (2007 to 2011). The therapeutic options offered were Extracorporeal Shock Waves Lithotripsy (ESWL), Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS), Percutaneous Lithotripsy (PCNL) and open surgery. Outcome measures were: first treatment chosen, stone free rate after a single procedure, and retreatment. Results were compared by chi-square test, with p <0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: 333 patients, mean age 9.7years, were treated, 161 in group A and 172 in group B. ESWL was the first option in both groups, but decreased by 34% in group B vs A. In contrast, RIRS and PCNL increased by 17% and 16%, respectively, in group B vs group A. Open surgery was never required in primary lithiasis cases without associated malformations. CONCLUSION: The advent of PCNL and RIRS has significantly changed the pattern of renal stone treatment in the pediatric age group. A progressive increase of endourologic minimally invasive procedures was recorded. Open surgery should be a very rare option.
BACKGROUND: Over the last 10years the miniaturization of endoscopic instruments made minimally invasive procedures for kidney stones feasible even in children. The evolution in management of kidney stones in a tertiary care center in Europe is reported. METHODS:Patients treated in our hospital for kidney stones from 2002 to 2011 were reviewed and group A (2002 to 2006) was compared with group B (2007 to 2011). The therapeutic options offered were Extracorporeal Shock Waves Lithotripsy (ESWL), Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS), Percutaneous Lithotripsy (PCNL) and open surgery. Outcome measures were: first treatment chosen, stone free rate after a single procedure, and retreatment. Results were compared by chi-square test, with p <0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: 333 patients, mean age 9.7years, were treated, 161 in group A and 172 in group B. ESWL was the first option in both groups, but decreased by 34% in group B vs A. In contrast, RIRS and PCNL increased by 17% and 16%, respectively, in group B vs group A. Open surgery was never required in primary lithiasis cases without associated malformations. CONCLUSION: The advent of PCNL and RIRS has significantly changed the pattern of renal stone treatment in the pediatric age group. A progressive increase of endourologic minimally invasive procedures was recorded. Open surgery should be a very rare option.
Authors: María Rodríguez-Monsalve Herrero; Steeve Doizi; Etienne Xavier Keller; Vincent De Coninck; Olivier Traxer Journal: Asian J Urol Date: 2018-06-22