Literature DB >> 23582626

Comparison of benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide in high-risk patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease.

George Bakris1, Alexandros Briasoulis, Bjorn Dahlof, Kenneth Jamerson, Michael A Weber, Roxzana Y Kelly, Allen Hester, Tsushung Hua, Dion Zappe, Bertram Pitt.   

Abstract

Combination therapy with benazepril 40 mg and amlodipine 10 mg (B+A) has been shown to be more effective than benazepril 40 mg and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg (B+H) in reducing cardiovascular (CV) events in high-risk patients with stage 2 hypertension with similar blood pressure reductions. In the present post hoc analysis, we evaluated whether B+A is more effective than B+H for reducing CV events in patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) at baseline in a subgroup analysis of the Avoiding Cardiovascular events through COMbination therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) study. The main trial randomized 11,506 patients. Of those, 5,744 received B+A and 5,762 received B+H. Of the 11,506 patients, 5,314 (46%) were classified as having CAD at baseline. The mean patient follow-up period was 35.7 months for the B+A group and 35.6 months for the B+H group. The primary end point was the interval to the first event of composite CV morbidity and mortality. At baseline, significant differences were present between the 5,314 with CAD and the 6,192 without CAD. The patients with CAD had a lower systolic blood pressure and heart rate, a lower incidence of diabetes, and greater incidence of dyslipidemia. However, no baseline differences were found between the randomized B+A and B+H groups. In the patients with CAD, an 18% reduction occurred in the hazard ratio for CV events (primary end point) with B+A versus B+H (p = 0.0016). In a prespecified secondary analysis of the composite end point, including only CV death, myocardial infarction, and stroke, the hazard ratio in the patients with CAD was reduced by 25% (p = 0.0033) in the B+A group compared with the B+H group. B+A was more effective than B+H at comparable blood pressure reductions for reducing CV events in patients, regardless of the presence of CAD. In conclusion, our findings suggest that the combination of B+A should be preferentially used for older patients with high-risk, stage 2 hypertension.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23582626     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

Review 1.  New Hypertension Guidelines: Progression or a Step Backwards in Hypertension?

Authors:  Markus van der Giet; Markus Tölle
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  NFAT5 moves to Fat City.

Authors:  Friedrich C Luft
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 3.  Anti-hypertensive drug treatment of patients with and the metabolic syndrome and obesity: a review of evidence, meta-analysis, post hoc and guidelines publications.

Authors:  Jonathan G Owen; Efrain Reisin
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Predictors and outcomes of resistant hypertension among patients with coronary artery disease and hypertension.

Authors:  Steven M Smith; Yan Gong; Eileen Handberg; Franz H Messerli; George L Bakris; Ali Ahmed; Anthony A Bavry; Carl J Pepine; Rhonda M Cooper-Dehoff
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  Prior Medications and the Cardiovascular Benefits From Combination Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition Plus Calcium Channel Blockade Among High-Risk Hypertensive Patients.

Authors:  Robert D Brook; Niko Kaciroti; George Bakris; Björn Dahlöf; Bertram Pitt; Eric Velazquez; Michael Weber; Dion H Zappe; Tsushung Hau; Kenneth A Jamerson
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Monotherapy with amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild to moderate hypertension: Comparison of their efficacy and effects on electrolytes.

Authors:  Daniel C Nwachukwu; Anthonius A Eze; Nkiru Z Nwachukwu; Eddy I Aneke; Polycarp U Agu; Nkiru C Azubike; Leonard Fo Obika; Onochie I Okoye
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.875

7.  Comparative peripheral edema for dihydropyridines calcium channel blockers treatment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ling Liang; Janice Y Kung; Bradley Mitchelmore; Andrew Cave; Hoan Linh Banh
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.885

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.