PURPOSE: To evaluate the dosimetric impact of using one treatment plan for multiple fractions from a single tandem and ring applicator insertion of high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirteen cervical cancer patients undergoing high-dose-rate brachytherapy were followed. Patients received the total dose from a single applicator insertion in two fractions, given with at least 6 hours apart within 24 hours. The treatment plan was based on a CT scan taken before the first treatment fraction. A second CT was obtained before the second treatment fraction. The co-registered image series were used to evaluate the dosimetric impact of using a single treatment plan for both fractions. Applicator and catheters were measured to quantify interfraction displacement. RESULTS: When the Day 1 plan was applied to the Day 2 images, high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) coverage was reduced by as much as 17.4 percentage points. The mean decrease was 9.4 ± 5.0 percentage points (p < 0.0001). The rectum V75 increase was significant (p = 0.03), whereas the bladder V75 increase was not significant (p = 0.28). Volume changes in the HR-CTV contour from Day 1 to Day 2 were also observed (p = 0.29). Maximum applicator and catheter displacements of 10-30mm were seen, from Day 1 to Day 2. CONCLUSIONS: When the Day 1 plan was used on the Day 2, the HR-CTV coverage decreased significantly (p < 0.0001). Our study establishes the need for institutions to evaluate the necessity for replanning based on imaging obtained before each treatment fraction for their gynecologic brachytherapy techniques.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the dosimetric impact of using one treatment plan for multiple fractions from a single tandem and ring applicator insertion of high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirteen cervical cancerpatients undergoing high-dose-rate brachytherapy were followed. Patients received the total dose from a single applicator insertion in two fractions, given with at least 6 hours apart within 24 hours. The treatment plan was based on a CT scan taken before the first treatment fraction. A second CT was obtained before the second treatment fraction. The co-registered image series were used to evaluate the dosimetric impact of using a single treatment plan for both fractions. Applicator and catheters were measured to quantify interfraction displacement. RESULTS: When the Day 1 plan was applied to the Day 2 images, high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) coverage was reduced by as much as 17.4 percentage points. The mean decrease was 9.4 ± 5.0 percentage points (p < 0.0001). The rectum V75 increase was significant (p = 0.03), whereas the bladder V75 increase was not significant (p = 0.28). Volume changes in the HR-CTV contour from Day 1 to Day 2 were also observed (p = 0.29). Maximum applicator and catheter displacements of 10-30mm were seen, from Day 1 to Day 2. CONCLUSIONS: When the Day 1 plan was used on the Day 2, the HR-CTV coverage decreased significantly (p < 0.0001). Our study establishes the need for institutions to evaluate the necessity for replanning based on imaging obtained before each treatment fraction for their gynecologic brachytherapy techniques.
Authors: Antonio L Damato; Larissa J Lee; Mandar S Bhagwat; Ivan Buzurovic; Robert A Cormack; Susan Finucane; Jorgen L Hansen; Desmond A O'Farrell; Alecia Offiong; Una Randall; Scott Friesen; Akila N Viswanathan Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 2.362