BACKGROUND: Reduced flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is a known prognostic marker in heart failure (HF), but may be influenced by the brachial artery (BA) diameter. Aiming to adjust for this influence, we normalized FMD (nFMD) by the peak shear rate (PSR) and tested its prognostic power in HF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: BA diameter, FMD, difference in hyperemic versus rest brachial flow velocity (FVD), PSR (FVD/BA), and nFMD (FMD/PSR × 1000) were assessed in 71 HF patients. At follow-up (mean 512 days), 19 HF (27%) reached the combined endpoint (4 heart transplantations [HTs], 1 left ventricle assist device implantation [LVAD], and 14 cardiac deaths [CDs]). With multivariate Cox regression analysis, New York Heart Association functional class ≥III (hazard ratio [HR] 9.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.11-41.4; P = .003), digoxin use (HR 6.36, 95% CI 2.18-18.6; P = .0010), FMD (HR 0.703, 95% CI 0.547-0.904; P = .006), PSR (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.005-1.022; P = .001), FVD (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.06; P = .02), and nFMD (HR 0.535, 95% CI 0.39-0.74; P = .0001) were predictors of unfavorable outcome. Receiver operating characteristic curve for nFMD showed that patients with nFMD >5 seconds had significantly better event-free survival than patients with nFMD ≤5 seconds (log-rank test: P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: nFMD is a strong independent predictor of CD, HT, and LVAD in HF with left ventricular ejection fraction <40%. Patients with nFMD >5 seconds have a better prognosis than those with lower values.
BACKGROUND: Reduced flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is a known prognostic marker in heart failure (HF), but may be influenced by the brachial artery (BA) diameter. Aiming to adjust for this influence, we normalized FMD (nFMD) by the peak shear rate (PSR) and tested its prognostic power in HF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: BA diameter, FMD, difference in hyperemic versus rest brachial flow velocity (FVD), PSR (FVD/BA), and nFMD (FMD/PSR × 1000) were assessed in 71 HF patients. At follow-up (mean 512 days), 19 HF (27%) reached the combined endpoint (4 heart transplantations [HTs], 1 left ventricle assist device implantation [LVAD], and 14 cardiac deaths [CDs]). With multivariate Cox regression analysis, New York Heart Association functional class ≥III (hazard ratio [HR] 9.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.11-41.4; P = .003), digoxin use (HR 6.36, 95% CI 2.18-18.6; P = .0010), FMD (HR 0.703, 95% CI 0.547-0.904; P = .006), PSR (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.005-1.022; P = .001), FVD (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.06; P = .02), and nFMD (HR 0.535, 95% CI 0.39-0.74; P = .0001) were predictors of unfavorable outcome. Receiver operating characteristic curve for nFMD showed that patients with nFMD >5 seconds had significantly better event-free survival than patients with nFMD ≤5 seconds (log-rank test: P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: nFMD is a strong independent predictor of CD, HT, and LVAD in HF with left ventricular ejection fraction <40%. Patients with nFMD >5 seconds have a better prognosis than those with lower values.
Authors: Melissa A H Witman; Ryan S Garten; Jayson R Gifford; H Jonathan Groot; Joel D Trinity; Josef Stehlik; Jose N Nativi; Craig H Selzman; Stavros G Drakos; Russell S Richardson Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: G P T Areas; A Mazzuco; F R Caruso; R B Jaenisch; R Cabiddu; S A Phillips; R Arena; A Borghi-Silva Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 4.214
Authors: Glenn M Stewart; Courtney M Wheatley-Guy; Bruce D Johnson; Win K Shen; Chul-Ho Kim Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Karsten Königstein; Jonathan Wagner; Denis Infanger; Raphael Knaier; Gilles Nève; Christopher Klenk; Justin Carrard; Timo Hinrichs; Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-04-28
Authors: Anna Di Lorenzo; Gabriella Iannuzzo; Alessandro Parlato; Gianluigi Cuomo; Crescenzo Testa; Marta Coppola; Giuseppe D'Ambrosio; Domenico Alessandro Oliviero; Silvia Sarullo; Giuseppe Vitale; Cinzia Nugara; Filippo M Sarullo; Francesco Giallauria Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Kyuwan Lee; Irene Kang; Joanne E Mortimer; Fred Sattler; Wendy J Mack; Lindsey Avery Fitzsimons; George Salem; Christina M Dieli-Conwright Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-06-30 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jeffrey S Forsse; Zacharias Papadakis; Matthew N Peterson; James Kyle Taylor; Burritt W Hess; Nicholas Schwedock; Dale C Allison; Jackson O Griggs; Ronald L Wilson; Peter W Grandjean Journal: Life (Basel) Date: 2022-01-09
Authors: E Venturini; G Iannuzzo; A D'Andrea; M Pacileo; L Tarantini; M L Canale; M Gentile; G Vitale; F M Sarullo; R Vastarella; A Di Lorenzo; C Testa; A Parlato; C Vigorito; F Giallauria Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 4.964