Literature DB >> 23581900

Experience of establishment of multiple mini structure interview as part of student admission policy at Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, 2011-2012.

Faten El Says1, Nasra Ayuob, Abdel Rhman Fahmy, Fayza El Fayez, Mohamed Hasanian, Basem El Deek.   

Abstract

Faculty of Medicine (FOM), King Abdulaziz University (KAU), requested for international recognition by the Laison Committee of Canadian Medical Education (LCME) during the period 2008-2010. Selection of medical students was a must standard in LCME. After obtaining a written permission from higher administration at KAU, a committee for the establishment of multiple-mini-interview (MMI) was formed and they conducted workshops to train faculty members at FOM on such process. The interviews were set up in a manner similar to that of an objective-structured clinical evaluation (OSCE), with the applicant moving from one station to another. The applicant was either asked to discuss a scenario or respond to direct questions. The interviewers used a standardized scoring form to rate candidates. When the data were analyzed, it was found that the performance of men students was insignificantly higher than that of women students in stations concerned with personnel character and professionalism. The performance of women students was significantly higher in all other stations (those considered motivation, morals and bioethics, team work and communication skills and behaviors). The women's overall performance was significantly higher than men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23581900     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.765543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  5 in total

1.  Clinician's Commentary on van der Spuy et al.1.

Authors:  Sharon Switzer-McIntyre
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  The fairness, predictive validity and acceptability of multiple mini interview in an internationally diverse student population--a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Maureen E Kelly; Jon Dowell; Adrian Husbands; John Newell; Siun O'Flynn; Thomas Kropmans; Fidelma P Dunne; Andrew W Murphy
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 3.  Multiple Mini Interview as an admission tool in higher education: Insights from a systematic review.

Authors:  Muhamad S Bahri Yusoff
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-10

4.  Relationship between admission criteria and academic performance in basic science courses in health science colleges in KAU.

Authors:  Aliaa Amr Alamoudi; Hind Ibrahim Fallatah; Basmah Medhat Eldakhakhny; Fatemah Omar Kamel; Lana Adey AlShawwa; Ayman Zaky Elsamanoudy
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 5.  A systematic review of stakeholder views of selection methods for medical schools admission.

Authors:  M E Kelly; F Patterson; S O'Flynn; J Mulligan; A W Murphy
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.463

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.