Literature DB >> 23581623

Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for the management of recurrent difficult bile duct stones after previous endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Hyung Geun Yoon1, Jong Ho Moon, Hyun Jong Choi, Dong Choon Kim, Myung Soo Kang, Tae Hoon Lee, Sang-Woo Cha, Young Deok Cho, Sang-Heum Park, Sun-Joo Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic management of recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is effective and safe. However, repeat EST for extension of a previous EST for recurrent bile duct stones may involve substantial risk. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) without repeat EST for recurrent difficult bile duct stones after previous EST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2006 to October 2010, a total of 52 patients were enrolled; all had undergone EPLBD (balloon diameter: 12-20 mm) to remove recurrent difficult bile duct stones after previous EST. In all patients, stone removal had failed with conventional methods using a basket and/or balloon. The size of the balloon for EPLBD was selected to fit the diameter of the common bile duct or the largest stone.
RESULTS: The median interval between initial EST and stone recurrence was 2.2 years (range 1-10). Median diameters of thelargest stone and balloon were 20.1 mm (range 12-40) and 14.7 mm (range 12-20), respectively. Complete stone removal was achieved in all patients (100%). The median number of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography sessions needed for complete stone removal was 1.6 (range 1-3). Additional lithotripsy was required in 16 patients (30.7%). No procedure-related complications were documented, with the exception of four cases of asymptomatic hyperamylasemia. The recurrence rate of CBD stones after bile duct clearance was 17.3% (9/52) during the follow-up period (mean 27.0 ± 14.1 months).
CONCLUSIONS: EPLBD without repeat EST is effective and relatively safe for the extraction of recurrent difficult bile duct stones after previous EST.
© 2013 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy © 2013 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation; endoscopic sphincterotomy; recurrent bile duct stone

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23581623     DOI: 10.1111/den.12102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Endosc        ISSN: 0915-5635            Impact factor:   7.559


  10 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for the removal of bile duct stones.

Authors:  Jin Hong Kim; Min Jae Yang; Jae Chul Hwang; Byung Moo Yoo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Small sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs sphincterotomy alone for removal of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Shi-Bin Guo; Hua Meng; Zhi-Jun Duan; Chun-Yan Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Surgical treatments for patients with recurrent bile duct stones and Oddis sphincter laxity.

Authors:  Boxuan Zhou; Jinxiong Hu; Yuesi Zhong
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2017-08

Review 4.  Reappraisal of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kwok-Hung Lai; Hoi-Hung Chan; Tzung-Jiun Tsai; Jin-Shiung Cheng; Ping-I Hsu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-16

Review 5.  Balloon dilation itself may not be a major determinant of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.

Authors:  Sung Ill Jang; Gak Won Yun; Dong Ki Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Large balloon dilation post endoscopic sphincterotomy in removal of difficult common bile duct stones: a literature review.

Authors:  Olivier Rouquette; Gilles Bommelaer; Armando Abergel; Laurent Poincloux
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  A feasibility study of digital single-operator cholangioscopy for diagnostic and therapeutic procedure (with videos).

Authors:  Miyuki Imanishi; Takeshi Ogura; Yoshitaka Kurisu; Saori Onda; Wataru Takagi; Atsushi Okuda; Akira Miyano; Mio Amano; Nobu Nishioka; Daisuke Masuda; Kazuhide Higuchi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Controversies in ERCP: Technical aspects.

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Noor L Bekkali; Sean Burmeister; Yi Dong; Simon M Everett; Michael Hocke; Andre Ignee; Wei On; Srisha Hebbar; Kofi Oppong; Siyu Sun; Christian Jenssen; Barbara Braden
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.628

9.  Safety and efficacy of extending a previous endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of retained or recurrent common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Antonios Vezakis; Andreas Polydorou; Elissaios Kontis; Eirini Pantiora; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Georgios Fragulidis
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-10-26

10.  Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Alone versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Removal of Bile Duct Stones.

Authors:  Tao Li; Jun Wen; Like Bie; Biao Gong
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.260

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.