Literature DB >> 23580461

Responsiveness of quantitative cartilage measures over one year in knee osteoarthritis: comparison of radiography and MRI assessments.

Megan S Cromer1, Roger M Bourne, Marlene Fransen, Roger Fulton, Shih-Chang Wang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To directly compare the responsiveness of quantitative imaging measures of disease progression in knee osteoarthritis (OA). In the medial compartment of the knee comparison was made between: 1) radiographic joint space narrowing (JSN); 2) global quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) of cartilage volume; 3) regional qMRI of cartilage thickness; and 4) regional analysis using an ordered value (OV) methodology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3T MRI and weight-bearing radiography of the knees were performed at baseline and 1-year timepoints in 23 subjects (mean age 63 years) with symptomatic knee OA. Standardized response means (SRM) were calculated for each measure. Statistical analysis to determine significance of change between timepoints was performed with a two-tailed Student's t-test (JSN, global, regional analysis) and nonparametric Mann-Whitney test (ordered values).
RESULTS: At 1 year, global cartilage volume losses of 2.3% (SRM -0.44) in the medial tibia and 6.9% in the medial femur (SRM -0.74) were recorded. SRM for JSN was -0.46. Regional analysis revealed largest reductions in cartilage thickness in the external (SRM -0.84) weight-bearing subregion of the medial femur and in the posterior subregion of the medial tibia (SRM -0.79). OV analysis in the medial compartment revealed areas of cartilage thinning (four ranked OV) and cartilage thickening (two ranked OV).
CONCLUSION: The MRI OV approach proved to be a superior analysis tool for detecting changes in cartilage morphology over a 1-year period. Radiographically defined JSN was found to be the least responsive measurement method of knee OA disease progression.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  JSN; cartilage thickness; knee osteoarthritis; quantitative magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23580461     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  5 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of cartilage and bone: promises and pitfalls in clinical trials of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  F Eckstein; A Guermazi; G Gold; J Duryea; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; W Wirth; C G Miller
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 2.  Non-invasive and in vivo assessment of osteoarthritic articular cartilage: a review on MRI investigations.

Authors:  Ahmad Fadzil Mohd Hani; Dileep Kumar; Aamir Saeed Malik; Raja Mohd Kamil Raja Ahmad; Ruslan Razak; Azman Kiflie
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Clinical and radiographic comparison of a single LP-PRP injection, a single hyaluronic acid injection and daily NSAID administration with a 52-week follow-up: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David Buendía-López; Manuel Medina-Quirós; Miguel Ángel Fernández-Villacañas Marín
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-08-20

4.  Hip osteoarthritis in dogs: a randomized study using mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue and plasma rich in growth factors.

Authors:  Belen Cuervo; Monica Rubio; Joaquin Sopena; Juan Manuel Dominguez; Jose Vilar; Manuel Morales; Ramón Cugat; Jose Maria Carrillo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Change in knee structure and change in tibiofemoral joint space width: a five year longitudinal population-based study.

Authors:  Joanna Hall; Laura L Laslett; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; Jean-Pierre Pelletier; François Abram; Chang-Hai Ding; Flavia M Cicuttini; Graeme Jones
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.