BACKGROUND: To reduce suicides among Veterans, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has designated suicide risk assessments for Veterans who screen positive for depression or post-traumatic stress disorder as a national performance goal. Many VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) are using brief suicidal ideation screens, administered in non-mental health ambulatory care settings, as the first step in the assessment process. OBJECTIVE: To explore Veterans' perceptions of the suicide screening and risk assessment process, the barriers and facilitators to disclosing suicidal thoughts, and perceptions of possible consequences of revealing suicidal thoughts. DESIGN: Investigators recorded one semi-structured interview with each Veteran. Transcripts were analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) Veterans who screened positive for suicidal ideation in non-mental health ambulatory care settings in 2009 and 2010. KEY RESULTS: Veterans accepted the need to assess suicide risk. They increasingly experienced attempts to suppress and avoid thoughts of suicide as burdensome and exhausting. Despite this, Veterans often failed to disclose severe and pervasive suicidal thoughts when screened because: (1) they considered suicidal thoughts as shameful and a sign of weakness; (2) they believed suicidal thoughts were private and not to be divulged to strangers; (3) they worried that disclosure would lead to unwanted hospitalization or medication recommendations; and (4) the templated computer reminder process was perceived as perfunctory and disrespectful. In contrast, admitting and discussing thoughts of suicide with a health provider who focused on building a relationship, demonstrated genuineness and empathy, offered information on the rationale for suicide risk assessment, and used straightforward and understandable language, all promoted trust that resulted in more honest disclosure of suicidal thoughts. CONCLUSION: In ambulatory care settings, both provider behaviors and system modifications may lead to more honest disclosure of suicidal thoughts.
BACKGROUND: To reduce suicides among Veterans, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has designated suicide risk assessments for Veterans who screen positive for depression or post-traumatic stress disorder as a national performance goal. Many VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) are using brief suicidal ideation screens, administered in non-mental health ambulatory care settings, as the first step in the assessment process. OBJECTIVE: To explore Veterans' perceptions of the suicide screening and risk assessment process, the barriers and facilitators to disclosing suicidal thoughts, and perceptions of possible consequences of revealing suicidal thoughts. DESIGN: Investigators recorded one semi-structured interview with each Veteran. Transcripts were analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) Veterans who screened positive for suicidal ideation in non-mental health ambulatory care settings in 2009 and 2010. KEY RESULTS: Veterans accepted the need to assess suicide risk. They increasingly experienced attempts to suppress and avoid thoughts of suicide as burdensome and exhausting. Despite this, Veterans often failed to disclose severe and pervasive suicidal thoughts when screened because: (1) they considered suicidal thoughts as shameful and a sign of weakness; (2) they believed suicidal thoughts were private and not to be divulged to strangers; (3) they worried that disclosure would lead to unwanted hospitalization or medication recommendations; and (4) the templated computer reminder process was perceived as perfunctory and disrespectful. In contrast, admitting and discussing thoughts of suicide with a health provider who focused on building a relationship, demonstrated genuineness and empathy, offered information on the rationale for suicide risk assessment, and used straightforward and understandable language, all promoted trust that resulted in more honest disclosure of suicidal thoughts. CONCLUSION: In ambulatory care settings, both provider behaviors and system modifications may lead to more honest disclosure of suicidal thoughts.
Authors: Charles W Hoge; Carl A Castro; Stephen C Messer; Dennis McGurk; Dave I Cotting; Robert L Koffman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lauren M Denneson; Chandra Basham; Kathryn C Dickinson; Megan C Crutchfield; Lisa Millet; Xun Shen; Steven K Dobscha Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Bruce R Schackman; Zubin Dastur; David S Rubin; Judith Berger; Eli Camhi; Julie Netherland; Quanhong Ni; Ruth Finkelstein Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2009-08
Authors: Steven K Dobscha; Kathryn Corson; Drew A Helmer; Matthew J Bair; Lauren M Denneson; Cynthia Brandt; Anna Beane; Linda Ganzini Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2013-01-23 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: John F McCarthy; Marcia Valenstein; H Myra Kim; Mark Ilgen; Kara Zivin; Frederic C Blow Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-02-27 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: John F McCarthy; Robert M Bossarte; Ira R Katz; Caitlin Thompson; Janet Kemp; Claire M Hannemann; Christopher Nielson; Michael Schoenbaum Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler; Murray B Stein; James A Naifeh; Matthew K Nock; Pablo A Aliaga; Carol S Fullerton; Gary H Wynn; Tsz Hin Hinz Ng; Hieu M Dinh; Nancy A Sampson; Tzu-Cheg Kao; Michael Schoenbaum; James E McCarroll; Kenneth L Cox; Steven G Heeringa Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2016-11-29
Authors: Julie E Richards; Sarah D Hohl; Ursula Whiteside; Evette J Ludman; David C Grossman; Greg E Simon; Susan M Shortreed; Amy K Lee; Rebecca Parrish; Mary Shea; Ryan M Caldeiro; Robert B Penfold; Emily C Williams Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Steven K Dobscha; Lauren M Denneson; Anne E Kovas; Alan Teo; Christopher W Forsberg; Mark S Kaplan; Robert Bossarte; Bentson H McFarland Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 5.128