PURPOSE: Through a prospective comparison of patients with vertebral fractures and normal population, we illustrate effect of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) upon projection of load distribution changes. METHODS: Vertebroplasty group (36 symptomatic patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures) was evaluated on an electronic baropodometer registering projection of weight bearing areas on feet. Load distribution between right and left foot (including rear-front of the same foot) during standing and walking was recorded and compared before (group V1) and the day after (group V2) PV. Control group (30 healthy asymptomatic volunteers-no surgery record) were evaluated on the same baropodometer. RESULTS: Mean value of load distribution difference between rear-front of the same foot was 9.45 ± 6.79 % (54.72-45.28 %) upon standing and 14.76 ± 7.09 % (57.38-42.62 %) upon walking in the control group. Respective load distribution values before PV were 16.52 ± 11.23 and 30.91 ± 19.26 % and after PV were 10.08 ± 6.26 and 14.25 ± 7.68 % upon standing and walking respectively. Mean value of load distribution variation between the two feet was 6.36 and 14.6 % before and 4.62 and 10.4 % after PV upon standing and walking respectively. Comparison of load distribution variation (group V1-V2, group V1-control group) is statistically significant. Comparison of load distribution variation (group V2-control group) is not statistically significant. Comparison of load distribution variation among the two feet is statistically significant during walking but not statistically significant during standing. CONCLUSIONS: There is a statistically significant difference when comparing load distribution variation prior vertebroplasty and that of normal population. After vertebroplasty, this difference normalizes in a statistically significant way. PV is efficient on equilibrium-load distribution improvement as well.
PURPOSE: Through a prospective comparison of patients with vertebral fractures and normal population, we illustrate effect of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) upon projection of load distribution changes. METHODS: Vertebroplasty group (36 symptomatic patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures) was evaluated on an electronic baropodometer registering projection of weight bearing areas on feet. Load distribution between right and left foot (including rear-front of the same foot) during standing and walking was recorded and compared before (group V1) and the day after (group V2) PV. Control group (30 healthy asymptomatic volunteers-no surgery record) were evaluated on the same baropodometer. RESULTS: Mean value of load distribution difference between rear-front of the same foot was 9.45 ± 6.79 % (54.72-45.28 %) upon standing and 14.76 ± 7.09 % (57.38-42.62 %) upon walking in the control group. Respective load distribution values before PV were 16.52 ± 11.23 and 30.91 ± 19.26 % and after PV were 10.08 ± 6.26 and 14.25 ± 7.68 % upon standing and walking respectively. Mean value of load distribution variation between the two feet was 6.36 and 14.6 % before and 4.62 and 10.4 % after PV upon standing and walking respectively. Comparison of load distribution variation (group V1-V2, group V1-control group) is statistically significant. Comparison of load distribution variation (group V2-control group) is not statistically significant. Comparison of load distribution variation among the two feet is statistically significant during walking but not statistically significant during standing. CONCLUSIONS: There is a statistically significant difference when comparing load distribution variation prior vertebroplasty and that of normal population. After vertebroplasty, this difference normalizes in a statistically significant way. PV is efficient on equilibrium-load distribution improvement as well.
Authors: Roberto Luigi Cazzato; Teodora Bellone; Marco Scardapane; Pierre De Marini; Pierre-Alexis Autrusseau; Pierre Auloge; Julien Garnon; Jack W Jennings; Afshin Gangi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Salvatore Masala; Andrea Magrini; Amedeo Taglieri; Giovanni Nano; Antonio Chiaravalloti; Eros Calabria; Roberta Di Trapano; Antonio Pietroiusti; Giovanni Simonetti Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Dimitrios K Filippiadis; Panagiotis Papagelopoulos; Maria Kitsou; Nikolaos Oikonomopoulos; Elias Brountzos; Nikolaos Kelekis; Alexis Kelekis Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 3.411