Literature DB >> 23580071

CYP3A4 and seasonal variation in vitamin D status in addition to CYP2D6 contribute to therapeutic endoxifen level during tamoxifen therapy.

Wendy A Teft1, Inna Y Gong, Brian Dingle, Kylea Potvin, Jawaid Younus, Theodore A Vandenberg, Muriel Brackstone, Francisco E Perera, Yun-Hee Choi, Guangyong Zou, Robin M Legan, Rommel G Tirona, Richard B Kim.   

Abstract

Tamoxifen is a widely utilized adjuvant anti-estrogen agent for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, known to undergo CYP2D6-mediated bioactivation to endoxifen. However, little is known regarding additional genetic and non-genetic determinants of optimal endoxifen plasma concentration. Therefore, 196 breast cancer patients on tamoxifen were enrolled in this prospective study over a 24-month period. Blood samples were collected for pharmacogenetic and drug-level analysis of tamoxifen and metabolites. Regression analysis indicated that besides CYP2D6, the recently described CYP3A4*22 genotype, seasonal variation, and concomitant use of CYP2D6-inhibiting antidepressants were significant predictors of endoxifen concentration. Of note, genetic variation explained 33 % of the variability while non-genetic variables accounted for 13 %. Given the proposed notion of a sub-therapeutic endoxifen concentration for predicting breast cancer recurrence, we set the therapeutic threshold at 18 nM, the 20th percentile for endoxifen level among enrolled patients in this cohort. Nearly 70 % of CYP2D6 poor metabolizers as well as extensive metabolizers on potent CYP2D6-inhibiting antidepressants exhibited endoxifen levels below 18 nM, while carriers of CYP3A4*22 were twofold less likely to be in sub-therapeutic range. Unexpectedly, endoxifen levels were 20 % lower during winter months than mean levels across seasons, which was also associated with lower vitamin D levels. CYP3A4*22 genotype along with sunshine exposure and vitamin D status may be unappreciated contributors of tamoxifen efficacy. The identified covariates along with demographic variables were integrated to create an endoxifen concentration prediction algorithm to pre-emptively evaluate the likelihood of individual patients falling below the optimal endoxifen concentration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23580071     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2511-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  31 in total

1.  In vivo assessment of the metabolic activity of CYP2D6 diplotypes and alleles.

Authors:  Daniel L Hertz; Anna C Snavely; Howard L McLeod; Christine M Walko; Joseph G Ibrahim; Steven Anderson; Karen E Weck; Gustav Magrinat; Oludamilola Olajide; Susan Moore; Rachel Raab; Daniel R Carrizosa; Steven Corso; Garry Schwartz; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; James P Evans; David R Jones; Zeruesenay Desta; David A Flockhart; Lisa A Carey; William J Irvin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Tamoxifen metabolism in breast cancer treatment: Taking the focus off the CYP2D6 gene.

Authors:  A Novillo; A Romero-Lorca; M Gaibar; M Rubio; A Fernández-Santander
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.550

3.  Sources of Interindividual Variability.

Authors:  Yvonne S Lin; Kenneth E Thummel; Brice D Thompson; Rheem A Totah; Christi W Cho
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  An Antiestrogenic Activity Score for tamoxifen and its metabolites is associated with breast cancer outcome.

Authors:  A H M de Vries Schultink; X Alexi; E van Werkhoven; L Madlensky; L Natarajan; S W Flatt; W Zwart; S C Linn; B A Parker; A H B Wu; J P Pierce; A D R Huitema; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Individualized Tamoxifen Dose Escalation: Confirmation of Feasibility, Question of Utility.

Authors:  Daniel L Hertz; James M Rae
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Comprehensive assessment of cytochromes P450 and transporter genetics with endoxifen concentration during tamoxifen treatment.

Authors:  Lauren A Marcath; Allison M Deal; Emily Van Wieren; William Danko; Christine M Walko; Joseph G Ibrahim; Karen E Weck; David R Jones; Zeruesenay Desta; Howard L McLeod; Lisa A Carey; William J Irvin; Daniel L Hertz
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Association of CYP2D6*10 (c.100C>T) polymorphisms with clinical outcome of breast cancer after tamoxifen adjuvant endocrine therapy in Chinese population.

Authors:  Lei Lei; Xian Wang; Xiao-Dan Wu; Zeng Wang; Zhan-Hong Chen; Ya-Bin Zheng; Xiao-Jia Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 8.  Influence of vitamin D signaling on hormone receptor status and HER2 expression in breast cancer.

Authors:  Xi Zhang; Nadia Harbeck; Udo Jeschke; Sophie Doisneau-Sixou
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Re-evaluation of cytostatic therapies for meningiomas in vitro.

Authors:  Annette Wilisch-Neumann; Doreen Pachow; Maren Wallesch; Astrid Petermann; Frank D Böhmer; Elmar Kirches; Christian Mawrin
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Tamoxifen Dose Escalation in Patients With Diminished CYP2D6 Activity Normalizes Endoxifen Concentrations Without Increasing Toxicity.

Authors:  Daniel L Hertz; Allison Deal; Joseph G Ibrahim; Christine M Walko; Karen E Weck; Steven Anderson; Gustav Magrinat; Oludamilola Olajide; Susan Moore; Rachel Raab; Daniel R Carrizosa; Steven Corso; Garry Schwartz; Mark Graham; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; David R Jones; Zeruesenay Desta; David A Flockhart; James P Evans; Howard L McLeod; Lisa A Carey; William J Irvin
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.