Literature DB >> 23579919

Effectiveness of a protocolized system to alert pulmonologists of lung cancer radiological suspicion.

V Leiro-Fernández1, M Botana-Rial, A Tilve-Gómez, C Represas-Represas, A Pallarés-Sanmartín, A Fernández-Villar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: When lung cancer (LC) is suspected in chest radiography, an adequate interpretation and management by experts would improve the selection, the access to rapid diagnostic units, the diagnostic effectiveness and prevent the loss of patients with suspected LC. To ensure this, we planned a system for alerting pulmonologists by radiologists to radiological suspicion of LC.
METHODS: This system consists of an alert from radiologists to pulmonologists through a specific email. The pulmonologists alerted has to contact the study doctor petitioner who must refer the patient for study to the Lung Cancer Rapid Diagnostic Unit (LCRDU). We have prospectively analyzed all patients studied in a 2-year period including clinical variables, time invested in the different diagnostic steps and the degree of collaboration and satisfaction among the involved professionals.
RESULTS: Of 118 alerts received, 84 (71 %) were studied in our LCRDU. The median of days until petitioner contact, patient consulted at LCRDU and to obtain a diagnosis was 1 (IQR 0-1.5), 2 (IQR 1-5) and 13 (IQR 7.5-30), respectively. In 45 cases (53 %), the suspicion of malignancy was confirmed (LC 84.4 % and metastasic 10.1 %). After staging was complete, 33 % of non-small cell lung cancer was potentially resectable (clinical TNM stage I-II). The level of satisfaction was high so that only one of the petitioner's studies chose other diagnostic pathways.
CONCLUSION: This strategy for radiological suspicion of LC ensures the communication between general practitioners, radiologists and pulmonologist improving the LC diagnostic effectiveness. This system can be easily implemented in health care systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23579919     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-013-1042-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  10 in total

1.  Misinterpretation of the chest x ray as a factor in the delayed diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  P M Turkington; N Kennan; M A Greenstone
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Timeliness of care in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  J K Olsson; E M Schultz; M K Gould
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  BTS recommendations to respiratory physicians for organising the care of patients with lung cancer. The Lung Cancer Working Party of the British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Timeliness of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment in a rapid outpatient diagnostic program with combined 18FDG-PET and contrast enhanced CT scanning.

Authors:  Pepijn Brocken; Berni A B Kiers; Monika G Looijen-Salamon; P N Richard Dekhuijzen; Chantal Smits-van der Graaf; Liesbeth Peters-Bax; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Henricus F M van der Heijden
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 5.705

5.  Delay in diagnosis of lung cancer in general practice.

Authors:  Marianne Bjerager; Torben Palshof; Ronald Dahl; Peter Vedsted; Frede Olesen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  [Lung cancer diagnosis: hospitalization costs].

Authors:  José Abal Arca; Manuel Angel Blanco Ramos; Ramón García de la Infanta; Cristina Pérez López; Luisa González Pérez; Joaquín Lamela López
Journal:  Arch Bronconeumol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Delays in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer.

Authors:  Eija-Riitta Salomaa; Susanna Sällinen; Heikki Hiekkanen; Kari Liippo
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 8.  The revised TNM staging system for lung cancer.

Authors:  Ramon Rami-Porta; John J Crowley; Peter Goldstraw
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.520

9.  Lung cancer. Practice organization.

Authors:  W Michael Alberts; Gerold Bepler; Todd Hazelton; John C Ruckdeschel; James H Williams
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Pathways to the diagnosis of lung cancer in the UK: a cohort study.

Authors:  Jacqueline Barrett; William Hamilton
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2008-05-18       Impact factor: 2.497

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Highly Sensitive Marker Panel for Guidance in Lung Cancer Rapid Diagnostic Units.

Authors:  Sonia Blanco-Prieto; Loretta De Chiara; Mar Rodríguez-Girondo; Lorena Vázquez-Iglesias; Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Berrocal; Alberto Fernández-Villar; María Isabel Botana-Rial; María Páez de la Cadena
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Influence of the type of emphysema in the relationship between COPD and lung cancer.

Authors:  Cecilia Mouronte-Roibás; Alberto Fernández-Villar; Alberto Ruano-Raviña; Cristina Ramos-Hernández; Amara Tilve-Gómez; Paula Rodríguez-Fernández; Adriana Carolina Caldera Díaz; Míriam García Vázquez-Noguerol; Sara Fernández-García; Virginia Leiro-Fernández
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2018-10-29

3.  Predicting delays in lung cancer diagnosis and staging.

Authors:  Virginia Leiro-Fernández; Cecilia Mouronte-Roibás; Esmeralda García-Rodríguez; Maribel Botana-Rial; Cristina Ramos-Hernández; María Torres-Durán; Alberto Ruano-Raviña; Alberto Fernández-Villar
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.500

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.