| Literature DB >> 23579266 |
Agnès J Ditisheim1, Charna Dibner, Jacques Philippe, Antoinette Pechère-Bertschi.
Abstract
The impact of impaired circadian rhythm on health has been widely studied in shift workers and trans-meridian travelers. A part from its correlation with sleep and mood disorders, biological rhythm impairment is a recognized risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and breast cancer. Preeclampsia is a major public health issue, associated with a significant maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality worldwide. While the risks factors for this condition such as obesity, diabetes, pre-existing hypertension have been identified, the underlying mechanism of this multi-factorial disease is yet not fully understood. The disruption of the light/dark cycle in pregnancy has been associated with adverse outcomes. Slightly increased risk for "small for gestational age" babies, "low birth weight" babies, and preterm deliveries has been reported in shift working women. Whether altered circadian cycle represents a risk factor for preeclampsia or preeclampsia is itself linked with an abnormal circadian cycle is less clear. There are only few reports available, showing conflicting results. In this review, we will discuss recent observations concerning circadian pattern of blood pressure in normotensive and hypertensive pregnancies. We explore the hypothesis that circadian misalignments may represent a risk factor for preeclampsia. Unraveling potential link between circadian clock gene and preeclampsia could offer a novel approach to our understanding of this multi-system disease specific to pregnancy.Entities:
Keywords: circadian clock; preeclampsia; pregnancy; shift work; women health
Year: 2013 PMID: 23579266 PMCID: PMC3619120 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2013.00047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Figure 1The network of the mammalian molecular oscillator. The core loop (red shaded circle), responsible for generating rhythms of about 24 h, is composed of activation of the Per genes by BMAL1 (red) and CLOCK (blue) and the increasing repression of Per gene expression by the accumulation of its own gene product. The feedback inhibition by the PER proteins is delayed by posttranslational modifications and interaction with the CRY proteins (not shown). In the stabilizing loop (blue circle), the Rev-Erbα gene (Reverse-erb alpha) is also activated by BMAL1 and CLOCK (not shown) and later on repressed by the PER proteins but immediately REV-ERBα starts to inhibit transcription of the Bmal1 and Clock genes and of its own gene. PER2 can interact with REV-ERBα (or PPARα, not shown) to regulate the Bmal1 gene. The overall organization of the network allows for a tight synchronization of the core and stabilizing loops. Adapted from Ripperger and Albrecht (2012).
Summary of the main studies on BP and circadian pattern during normal and abnormal pregnancies.
| Reference | Methods | Results | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seligman ( | Automatic recorder (24 h) Inpatients | Greater fall at night in HT Reduced fall at night in PE | Characteristics of the subject included are lacking (age, parity, weeks gestation) | |
| Results and figures not detailed for every subject | ||||
| Redman et al. ( | Automatic recorder (48 h) Inpatients, bedrest At 24 and 36 w.g. | Reversed rhythm in severe PE Normal pattern in mild HT | Characteristics of the women included are lacking (age, parity) Results and figures not detailed for every subject | |
| Sawyer et al. ( | DINAMAP (24 h) Inpatients | Blunted fall at night in PE No diurnal variation in two severe PE (excluded from analysis) | Characteristics of the women included are lacking (age, parity not precised except for PE) | |
| Beilin et al. ( | DINAMAP (24 h) Inpatients | Same circadian rhythm in normo and hypertensive groups | Two HT and three PE under treatment when studied | |
| >26 w.g. | No fall in BP in all PE, with four nocturnal HT | PE older, multiparous | ||
| Cugini et al. ( | ABPM (24 h) At 8–10, 18–20, and 32–34w.g. | Reduced means BP for gestational HT. Values tend to increase in the second and third trimester | ||
| Benedetto et al. ( | DINAMAP (24 h) Inpatients | BP oscillations less pronounced in GH and PE | Circadian parameters obtained by single cosinor method | |
| Singleton pregnancy | At 8–16, 20–25, 28–35, 36–40 w.g. | Severity of HT favor the loss of diurnal rhythm, especially in PE | ||
| Halligan et al. ( | ABPM (24 h) | Blunted BP nocturnal fallin PE. Inversely related to increase in BP mean | Preliminary, cross-sectional study Comparison of means and gradients | |
| Tranquilli et al. ( | ABPM (24 h) At 24–28 w.g. | BP significantly elevated in IUGR although still in normal range | ||
| Ayala et al. ( | ABPM (48 h) Every 4 weeks after first obstetric visit | Significant difference in BP between healthy and complicated pregnancies present in the first 14 w.g. | ||
| Olofsson and Poulsen ( | ABPM (24 h) Inpatients (range 23–40 weeks gestation) | 12 SBP reversed rhythm, of which 10 PE. Associated with a more severe PE, smaller BP variation, maintenance of fetal growth, higher birthweight | No control group | |
| Stoynev et al. ( | Automatic recorder (48 h) Inpatients | HR mesor increased in middle and late pregnancy. BP mesor unchanged | ||
| Hermida et al. ( | ABPM (48 h) Every 4 weeks after first obstetric visit until delivery | Difference in circadian variability present in the first 14 w.g. | Circadian parameters established by population multiple component-analysis | |
| Brown et al. ( | ABPM (24 h) Inpatients or outpatients | High prevalence of nocturnal HT in PE and GH/essential HT | ||
| Hermida et al. ( | ABPM (48 h) Every 4 weeks after first obstetric visit until delivery | Difference in the circadian variability already in first trimester | Circadian parameters established by population multiple component-analysis | |
| Hermida et al. ( | ABPM (48 h) Every 4 weeks after first obstetric visit until delivery | Significant difference in the 14 first w.g. between normal and complicated pregnancies | Circadian parameters established by population multiple component-analysis | |
| Comparison of the 24 h mean of pulse pressure |
BP, blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; ABPM, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; HT, hypertension; GH, gestational hypertension; IUGR, intrauterine growth retardation; w.g, weeks gestation; DINAMAP, device for indirect non-invasive automatic mean arterial pressure.