Literature DB >> 23579260

Death with dignity from the perspective of the surviving family: a survey study among family caregivers of deceased older adults.

Isis E van Gennip1, H Roeline W Pasman, Pam J Kaspers, Mariska G Oosterveld-Vlug, Dick L Willems, Dorly J H Deeg, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Death with dignity has been identified as important both to patients and their surviving family. While research results have been published on what patients themselves believe may affect the dignity of their deaths, little is known about what family caregivers consider to be a dignified death. AIM: (1) To assess the prevalence of death with dignity in older adults from the perspective of family caregivers, (2) to determine factors that diminish dignity during the dying phase according to family caregivers, and (3) to identify physical, psychosocial, and care factors associated with death with dignity.
DESIGN: A survey study with a self-administered questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: Family caregivers of 163 deceased older (>55 years of age) adults ("patients") who had participated in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam.
RESULTS: Of the family caregivers, 69% reported that their relative had died with dignity. Factors associated with a dignified death in a multivariate regression model were patients feeling peaceful and ready to die, absence of anxiety and depressive mood, presence of fatigue, and a clear explanation by the physician of treatment options during the final months of life.
CONCLUSIONS: The physical and psychosocial condition of the patient in combination with care factors contributed to death with dignity from the perspective of the family caregiver. The patient's state of mind during the last phase of life and clear communication on the part of the physician both seem to be of particular importance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death with dignity; end-of-life care; family caregivers; older adults

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23579260     DOI: 10.1177/0269216313483185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  8 in total

Review 1.  Defining a Good Death (Successful Dying): Literature Review and a Call for Research and Public Dialogue.

Authors:  Emily A Meier; Jarred V Gallegos; Lori P Montross Thomas; Colin A Depp; Scott A Irwin; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.105

2.  Grief and palliative care: mutuality.

Authors:  Paul J Moon
Journal:  Palliat Care       Date:  2013-08-01

3.  Dying at home: a qualitative study of family carers' views of support provided by GPs community staff.

Authors:  David Seamark; Susan Blake; Sarah G Brearley; Christine Milligan; Carol Thomas; Mary Turner; Xu Wang; Sheila Payne
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Still Searching: A Meta-Synthesis of a Good Death from the Bereaved Family Member Perspective.

Authors:  Kelly E Tenzek; Rachel Depner
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-25

5.  Dignity reflections based on experiences of end-of-life care during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative inquiry among bereaved relatives in the Netherlands (the CO-LIVE study).

Authors:  Yvonne N Becqué; Wendy van der Geugten; Agnes van der Heide; Ida J Korfage; H Roeline W Pasman; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Masha Zee; Erica Witkamp; Anne Goossensen
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2021-10-09

Review 6.  Concerns and potential improvements in end-of-life care from the perspectives of older patients and informal caregivers: a scoping review.

Authors:  Mina Motamedi; Caitlin Brandenburg; Mina Bakhit; Zoe A Michaleff; Loai Albarqouni; Justin Clark; Meidelynn Ooi; Danial Bahudin; Danielle Ní Chróinín; Magnolia Cardona
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.921

7.  The perceptions on good death of the older adults in the semi-urban community: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Araya Tipwong; Tanawat Ruamsook; Thitavan Hongkittiyanon; Kanit Kgowsiri
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2022-06-07

8.  The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam: cohort update 2016 and major findings.

Authors:  Emiel O Hoogendijk; Dorly J H Deeg; Jan Poppelaars; Marleen van der Horst; Marjolein I Broese van Groenou; Hannie C Comijs; H Roeline W Pasman; Natasja M van Schoor; Bianca Suanet; Fleur Thomése; Theo G van Tilburg; Marjolein Visser; Martijn Huisman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 8.082

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.