Literature DB >> 23579061

Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) manufacturing of advanced therapy medicinal products: a novel tailored model for optimizing performance and estimating costs.

Mohamed Abou-El-Enein1, Andy Römhild, Daniel Kaiser, Carola Beier, Gerhard Bauer, Hans-Dieter Volk, Petra Reinke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AIMS: Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP) have gained considerable attention in academia due to their therapeutic potential. Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) principles ensure the quality and sterility of manufacturing these products. We developed a model for estimating the manufacturing costs of cell therapy products and optimizing the performance of academic GMP-facilities.
METHODS: The "Clean-Room Technology Assessment Technique" (CTAT) was tested prospectively in the GMP facility of BCRT, Berlin, Germany, then retrospectively in the GMP facility of the University of California-Davis, California, USA. CTAT is a two-level model: level one identifies operational (core) processes and measures their fixed costs; level two identifies production (supporting) processes and measures their variable costs. The model comprises several tools to measure and optimize performance of these processes. Manufacturing costs were itemized using adjusted micro-costing system.
RESULTS: CTAT identified GMP activities with strong correlation to the manufacturing process of cell-based products. Building best practice standards allowed for performance improvement and elimination of human errors. The model also demonstrated the unidirectional dependencies that may exist among the core GMP activities. When compared to traditional business models, the CTAT assessment resulted in a more accurate allocation of annual expenses. The estimated expenses were used to set a fee structure for both GMP facilities. A mathematical equation was also developed to provide the final product cost.
CONCLUSIONS: CTAT can be a useful tool in estimating accurate costs for the ATMPs manufactured in an optimized GMP process. These estimates are useful when analyzing the cost-effectiveness of these novel interventions.
Copyright © 2013 International Society for Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23579061     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2012.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytotherapy        ISSN: 1465-3249            Impact factor:   5.414


  9 in total

1.  Burn patient care lost in good manufacturing practices?

Authors:  G Dimitropoulos; P Jafari; A de Buys Roessingh; N Hirt-Burri; W Raffoul; L A Applegate
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2016-06-30

2.  The business case for cell and gene therapies.

Authors:  Mohamed Abou-El-Enein; Gerhard Bauer; Petra Reinke
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  White paper on how to go forward with cell-based advanced therapies in Europe.

Authors:  Reinhold G Erben; Beatriz Silva-Lima; Ilona Reischl; Gustav Steinhoff; Gudrun Tiedemann; Wilfried Dalemans; Alexander Vos; Rob T A Janssen; Katarina Le Blanc; Gerjo J V M van Osch; Frank P Luyten
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 4.  Concise Review: A Comprehensive Analysis of Reported Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Unproven Stem Cell-Based Interventions.

Authors:  Gerhard Bauer; Magdi Elsallab; Mohamed Abou-El-Enein
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 5.  Scalable Manufacturing of CAR T cells for Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Mohamed Abou-El-Enein; Magdi Elsallab; Gerhard Bauer; Barbara Savoldo; Steven A Feldman; Andrew D Fesnak; Helen E Heslop; Peter Marks; Brian G Till
Journal:  Blood Cancer Discov       Date:  2021-08-03

6.  Microfluidic Transduction Harnesses Mass Transport Principles to Enhance Gene Transfer Efficiency.

Authors:  Reginald Tran; David R Myers; Gabriela Denning; Jordan E Shields; Allison M Lytle; Hommood Alrowais; Yongzhi Qiu; Yumiko Sakurai; William C Li; Oliver Brand; Joseph M Le Doux; H Trent Spencer; Christopher B Doering; Wilbur A Lam
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 7.  A review on exosomes application in clinical trials: perspective, questions, and challenges.

Authors:  Jafar Rezaie; Maryam Feghhi; Tahereh Etemadi
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 7.525

8.  Manufacturing of dental pulp cell-based products from human third molars: current strategies and future investigations.

Authors:  Maxime Ducret; Hugo Fabre; Olivier Degoul; Gianluigi Atzeni; Colin McGuckin; Nico Forraz; Brigitte Alliot-Licht; Frédéric Mallein-Gerin; Emeline Perrier-Groult; Jean-Christophe Farges
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Challenges in Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product Development: A Survey among Companies in Europe.

Authors:  Renske M T Ten Ham; Jarno Hoekman; Anke M Hövels; Andre W Broekmans; Hubert G M Leufkens; Olaf H Klungel
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 6.698

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.