BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 3D high-resolution MR imaging can provide reliable information for defining the exact relationships between the intraparotid facial nerve and adjacent structures. The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical value of using a surface coil combined with a 3D-PSIF-DWI sequence in intraparotid facial nerve imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one healthy volunteers underwent intraparotid facial nerve scanning at 3T by using the 3D-PSIF-DWI sequence with both the surface coil and the head coil. Source images were processed with MIP and MPR to better delineate the intraparotid facial nerve and its branches. In addition, the SIR of the facial nerve and parotid gland was calculated. The number of facial nerve branches displayed by these 2 methods was calculated and compared. RESULTS: The display rates of the main trunk, divisions (cervicofacial, temporofacial), and secondary branches of the intraparotid facial nerve were 100%, 97.6%, and 51.4% by head coil and 100%, 100%, and 83.8% by surface coil, respectively. The display rate of secondary branches of the intraparotid facial nerve by these 2 methods was significantly different (P < .05). The SIRs of the intraparotid facial nerve/parotid gland in these 2 methods were significantly different (P < .05) at 1.37 ± 1.06 and 1.89 ± 0.87, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D-PSIF-DWI sequence combined with a surface coil can better delineate the intraparotid facial nerve and its divisions than when it is combined with a head coil, providing better image contrast and resolution. The proposed protocol offers a potentially useful noninvasive imaging sequence for intraparotid facial nerve imaging at 3T.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 3D high-resolution MR imaging can provide reliable information for defining the exact relationships between the intraparotid facial nerve and adjacent structures. The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical value of using a surface coil combined with a 3D-PSIF-DWI sequence in intraparotid facial nerve imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one healthy volunteers underwent intraparotid facial nerve scanning at 3T by using the 3D-PSIF-DWI sequence with both the surface coil and the head coil. Source images were processed with MIP and MPR to better delineate the intraparotid facial nerve and its branches. In addition, the SIR of the facial nerve and parotid gland was calculated. The number of facial nerve branches displayed by these 2 methods was calculated and compared. RESULTS: The display rates of the main trunk, divisions (cervicofacial, temporofacial), and secondary branches of the intraparotid facial nerve were 100%, 97.6%, and 51.4% by head coil and 100%, 100%, and 83.8% by surface coil, respectively. The display rate of secondary branches of the intraparotid facial nerve by these 2 methods was significantly different (P < .05). The SIRs of the intraparotid facial nerve/parotid gland in these 2 methods were significantly different (P < .05) at 1.37 ± 1.06 and 1.89 ± 0.87, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D-PSIF-DWI sequence combined with a surface coil can better delineate the intraparotid facial nerve and its divisions than when it is combined with a head coil, providing better image contrast and resolution. The proposed protocol offers a potentially useful noninvasive imaging sequence for intraparotid facial nerve imaging at 3T.
Authors: John I Lane; Heidi Ward; Robert J Witte; Matt A Bernstein; Colin L W Driscoll Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Theodora Georgouli; Bernard Chang; Michael Nelson; Teifi James; Steven Tanner; David Shelley; Manuel Saldana; Dennis McGonagle Journal: Orbit Date: 2008
Authors: Oliver Kraff; Jens M Theysohn; Stefan Maderwald; Patrick C Kokulinsky; Zeynel Dogan; Alexander Kerem; Stefan Kruszona; Mark E Ladd; Elke R Gizewski; Susanne C Ladd Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: J P Guenette; N Ben-Shlomo; J Jayender; R T Seethamraju; V Kimbrell; N-A Tran; R Y Huang; C J Kim; J I Kass; C E Corrales; T C Lee Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: John Maddalozzo; Douglas R Johnston; Andre Isaac; Bharat Bhushan; Jeffrey C Rastatter Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Date: 2019-08-19