BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Different flow velocities have been reported after carotid angioplasty with stenting (CAS) than after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We compared blood flow velocities following CAS and CEA in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS; ISRCTN25337470). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 254 patients (70% male; 129 CAS and 125 CEA) were included. Mean peak systolic velocities (PSVICA) were assessed at baseline, 30 days, 1 and 2 years. Following both treatments, restenosis ≥ 50% was defined as PSVmean >125 cm s(-1). RESULTS: CAS and CEA resulted in a similar reduction in PSVICA 1 month after treatment. Post-intervention analysis for each treatment separately revealed that PSVICA following CAS increased significantly during follow-up (30 days to 2 years; 22.4 cm s(-1); 95% confidence interval (CI), 14.3 to 30.5). On the contrary, PSVICA following CEA remained relatively stable during follow-up (4.7 cm s(-1); 95% CI, -6.5 to 15.9). When we analysed the increase in PSVICA between both treatments after 2 years of follow-up, no significant interprocedural difference was observed. The internal carotid artery/common carotid artery (ICA/CCA) PSV ratio increased after CAS but not after CEA: 1.2 vs. 1.1 (0.04, 95% CI; -0.16 to 0.25) at 30 days; 1.5 vs. 1.1 (0.39, 95% CI; 0.13 to 0.65) at 1 year; and 1.5 vs. 1.1 (0.36; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.63) at 2 years. The rate of apparent ipsilateral ICA restenosis >50% was higher following CAS (hazard ratio 2.35; 95% CI, 1.35 to 4.09). CONCLUSION: Two years after carotid revascularisation, no significant interprocedural difference was observed in the increase of PSVICA between CAS and CEA. However, the ICA/CCA ratio increased more following CAS resulting in an apparent higher rate of restenosis following CAS. Crown
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Different flow velocities have been reported after carotid angioplasty with stenting (CAS) than after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We compared blood flow velocities following CAS and CEA in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS; ISRCTN25337470). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 254 patients (70% male; 129 CAS and 125 CEA) were included. Mean peak systolic velocities (PSVICA) were assessed at baseline, 30 days, 1 and 2 years. Following both treatments, restenosis ≥ 50% was defined as PSVmean >125 cm s(-1). RESULTS: CAS and CEA resulted in a similar reduction in PSVICA 1 month after treatment. Post-intervention analysis for each treatment separately revealed that PSVICA following CAS increased significantly during follow-up (30 days to 2 years; 22.4 cm s(-1); 95% confidence interval (CI), 14.3 to 30.5). On the contrary, PSVICA following CEA remained relatively stable during follow-up (4.7 cm s(-1); 95% CI, -6.5 to 15.9). When we analysed the increase in PSVICA between both treatments after 2 years of follow-up, no significant interprocedural difference was observed. The internal carotid artery/common carotid artery (ICA/CCA) PSV ratio increased after CAS but not after CEA: 1.2 vs. 1.1 (0.04, 95% CI; -0.16 to 0.25) at 30 days; 1.5 vs. 1.1 (0.39, 95% CI; 0.13 to 0.65) at 1 year; and 1.5 vs. 1.1 (0.36; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.63) at 2 years. The rate of apparent ipsilateral ICA restenosis >50% was higher following CAS (hazard ratio 2.35; 95% CI, 1.35 to 4.09). CONCLUSION: Two years after carotid revascularisation, no significant interprocedural difference was observed in the increase of PSVICA between CAS and CEA. However, the ICA/CCA ratio increased more following CAS resulting in an apparent higher rate of restenosis following CAS. Crown