OBJECTIVE: High frequency oscillations (HFOs) are brief electroencephalographic events associated with epileptic activity, and likely representing biological markers of the epileptogenic zone. HFOs are usually detected with intracranial EEG and detection is influenced by contact size. The size of commercially available intracerebral electrodes varies widely. This study assesses HFO detection rates from adjacent electrode contacts in human intracerebral recordings. METHODS: Intracerebral recordings were collected from 11 patients undergoing stereoelectroencephalographic investigation using hybrid depth electrodes containing adjacent large (0.8 or 5 mm(2)) and small (0.2 or 0.3 mm(2)) contacts. HFOs were marked manually during 5-min tracings in 131 pairs of adjacent large and small contacts. HFO rates per minute and mean event durations were compared between adjacent contacts. RESULTS: A minimal but statistically significant advantage in ripple detection was found in a subgroup of large contacts. Otherwise, HFO rates and mean event durations were not statistically different between groups. CONCLUSION: The size of clinical contacts within the studied range did not influence HFO detection in a clinically relevant manner. Larger contacts provide a minimal advantage for ripple detection. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that commercially available intracerebral electrodes with contacts between 0.2 and 5 mm(2) likely possess similar HFO detection abilities.
OBJECTIVE: High frequency oscillations (HFOs) are brief electroencephalographic events associated with epileptic activity, and likely representing biological markers of the epileptogenic zone. HFOs are usually detected with intracranial EEG and detection is influenced by contact size. The size of commercially available intracerebral electrodes varies widely. This study assesses HFO detection rates from adjacent electrode contacts in human intracerebral recordings. METHODS: Intracerebral recordings were collected from 11 patients undergoing stereoelectroencephalographic investigation using hybrid depth electrodes containing adjacent large (0.8 or 5 mm(2)) and small (0.2 or 0.3 mm(2)) contacts. HFOs were marked manually during 5-min tracings in 131 pairs of adjacent large and small contacts. HFO rates per minute and mean event durations were compared between adjacent contacts. RESULTS: A minimal but statistically significant advantage in ripple detection was found in a subgroup of large contacts. Otherwise, HFO rates and mean event durations were not statistically different between groups. CONCLUSION: The size of clinical contacts within the studied range did not influence HFO detection in a clinically relevant manner. Larger contacts provide a minimal advantage for ripple detection. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that commercially available intracerebral electrodes with contacts between 0.2 and 5 mm(2) likely possess similar HFO detection abilities.
Authors: Julia Jacobs; Pierre Levan; Claude-Edouard Châtillon; André Olivier; François Dubeau; Jean Gotman Journal: Brain Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Greg A Worrell; Landi Parish; Stephen D Cranstoun; Rachel Jonas; Gordon Baltuch; Brian Litt Journal: Brain Date: 2004-05-20 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Jimmy C Yang; Angelique C Paulk; Pariya Salami; Sang Heon Lee; Mehran Ganji; Daniel J Soper; Daniel Cleary; Mirela Simon; Douglas Maus; Jong Woo Lee; Brian V Nahed; Pamela S Jones; Daniel P Cahill; Garth Rees Cosgrove; Catherine J Chu; Ziv Williams; Eric Halgren; Shadi Dayeh; Sydney S Cash Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Julia Jacobs; Joyce Y Wu; Piero Perucca; Rina Zelmann; Malenka Mader; Francois Dubeau; Gary W Mathern; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Jean Gotman Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Efstathios D Kondylis; Thomas A Wozny; Witold J Lipski; Alexandra Popescu; Vincent J DeStefino; Behnaz Esmaeili; Vineet K Raghu; Anto Bagic; R Mark Richardson Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Aaron M Spring; Daniel J Pittman; Yahya Aghakhani; Jeffrey Jirsch; Neelan Pillay; Luis E Bello-Espinosa; Colin Josephson; Paolo Federico Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 4.003