Literature DB >> 23578290

The effect of different durations of carbohydrate mouth rinse on cycling performance.

Jonathan Sinclair1, Lindsay Bottoms, Ciaran Flynn, Eoin Bradley, Gareth Alexander, Sean McCullagh, Thomas Finn, Howard Thomas Hurst.   

Abstract

Carbohydrate (CHO) mouth rinse has been shown to improve time trial performance. Although the exact mechanism remains un-established, research postulates that there are oral cavity receptors which increase neural drive. Increasing the duration of the mouth rinse could potentially increase stimulation of these receptors. The aim of the current investigation was to determine whether the duration of mouth rinse with 6.4% CHO affected 30-min self-selected cycling performance. Eleven male participants (age =24.1±3.9 years) performed three 30-min self-paced trials. On one occasion water was given as a mouth rinse for 5 s without being ingested placebo (PLA), on the other two occasions a 6.4% CHO solution was given for 5 and 10 s. Distance cycled, heart rate, ratings of perceived exertion, cadence, speed and power were recorded throughout all trials. The main findings were that distance cycled during the 10-s mouth rinse trial (20.4±2.3 km) was significantly greater compared to the PLA trial (19.2±2.2 km; P<0.01). There was no difference between the 5- and 10-s trials (P=0.15). However, 10 out of 11 participants cycled further during the 5-s trial compared to PLA, and eight cycled further during the 10-s trial compared to the 5 s. In conclusion, although there was an improvement in distance cycled with the 5-s mouth rinse compared to the PLA it was only significant with 10 s suggesting a dose response to the duration of mouth rinse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23578290     DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2013.785599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci        ISSN: 1536-7290            Impact factor:   4.050


  25 in total

Review 1.  ISSN exercise & sports nutrition review update: research & recommendations.

Authors:  Chad M Kerksick; Colin D Wilborn; Michael D Roberts; Abbie Smith-Ryan; Susan M Kleiner; Ralf Jäger; Rick Collins; Mathew Cooke; Jaci N Davis; Elfego Galvan; Mike Greenwood; Lonnie M Lowery; Robert Wildman; Jose Antonio; Richard B Kreider
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  Running Performance With Nutritive and Nonnutritive Sweetened Mouth Rinses.

Authors:  Keely R Hawkins; Sridevi Krishnan; Lara Ringos; Vanessa Garcia; Jamie A Cooper
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 4.010

Review 3.  Fructose-Glucose Composite Carbohydrates and Endurance Performance: Critical Review and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  David S Rowlands; S Houltham; K Musa-Veloso; F Brown; L Paulionis; D Bailey
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse Improves Cycling Time-Trial Performance without Altering Plasma Insulin Concentration.

Authors:  Kevin O Murray; Hunter L Paris; Alyce D Fly; Robert F Chapman; Timothy D Mickleborough
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  The Influence of Serial Carbohydrate Mouth Rinsing on Power Output during a Cycle Sprint.

Authors:  Shaun M Phillips; Scott Findlay; Mykolas Kavaliauskas; Marie Clare Grant
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  The ergogenic potency of carbohydrate mouth rinse on endurance running performance of dehydrated athletes.

Authors:  Harris Kamal Kamaruddin; Cheong Hwa Ooi; Toby Mündel; Abdul Rashid Aziz; Ahmad Munir Che Muhamed
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  A Narrative Review of Current Concerns and Future Perspectives of the Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse Effects on Exercise Performance.

Authors:  Vitor de Salles Painelli; Cayque Brietzke; Paulo Estevão Franco-Alvarenga; Raul Canestri; Ítalo Vinícius; Flávio Oliveira Pires
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-05-13

8.  Electro-physiological changes in the brain induced by caffeine or glucose nasal spray.

Authors:  K De Pauw; B Roelands; J Van Cutsem; U Marusic; T Torbeyns; R Meeusen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Carbohydrate mouth rinsing does not affect 6-min walk test performance and blood glucose responses in older adults.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Evans; Terrence Brophy; Matthew R Braswell; Joshua Boyle; G Keith Harris; Ruth H Watkins; Stephen P Bailey
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 10.  Menthol Mouth Rinsing Is More Than Just a Mouth Wash-Swilling of Menthol to Improve Physiological Performance.

Authors:  Erica H Gavel; Kierstyn V Hawke; David J Bentley; Heather M Logan-Sprenger
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.