Literature DB >> 23577781

Communication in nuclear emergency preparedness: a closer look at information reception.

Tanja Perko1, Baldwin van Gorp, Catrinel Turcanu, Peter Thijssen, Benny Carle.   

Abstract

Preparedness of the general population plays a key role in the effective implementation of protective actions in case of a nuclear emergency (e.g., evacuation or intake of iodine tablets). In this context, a good communication of emergency management actors with the public along the entire cycle of preparedness-response-recovery is of paramount importance. This article aims at providing a better understanding of the way people process communicated messages and the factors that may influence how they do this. In particular, it investigates information reception as part of the information processing in precrisis communication. As a case study, the precrisis communication context was chosen, as it has been tackled to a lesser extent in the literature. The empirical data used for this study originated from a large-scale opinion survey in Belgium. One topic in this survey addressed the information campaign for the distribution of iodine tablets, in the context of preparedness for nuclear emergencies. The findings of this study demonstrate that systematic predictors have a stronger influence on information reception, as compared to heuristic predictors. The latter are only to a minor extent involved in the reception of emergency preparedness information. The hypothesized pattern--that more specific knowledge about the field relates to a higher reception of information--was confirmed for precrisis communication. Contrary to expectations, results showed that people with a high perception of radiation risks were less attentive to information about protective actions. People with little confidence in authorities were also more likely to have a low reception of information.
© 2013 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Information processing; nuclear emergency; reception; risk communication; systematic and heuristic

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23577781     DOI: 10.1111/risa.12048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  2 in total

1.  Citizens' Communication Needs and Attitudes to Risk in a Nuclear Accident Scenario: A Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Joel Rasmussen; Mats Eriksson; Johan Martinsson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Proximity (Mis)perception: Public Awareness of Nuclear, Refinery, and Fracking Sites.

Authors:  Benjamin A Lyons; Heather Akin; Natalie Jomini Stroud
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.000

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.