Literature DB >> 23576917

Surgeon age as the major factor in recommendation of uni-compartmental knee replacement versus high tibial osteotomy: a case study in orthopaedic decision making.

Frederick R Dietz1, Mark G Kelman.   

Abstract

This case report concerns surgical decision making. The subject is a 59 year old male orthopaedic surgeon with medial compartment knee arthritis. Both high tibial valgus osteotomy and uni-compartmental knee replacement would be appropriate with similar outcomes reported in the literature. Surprisingly, almost all young surgeons recommended a uni-compartmental knee replacement and almost all older surgeons recommended a high tibial osteotomy. We discuss the reasons that surgeon age, which is clearly irrelevant to the optimal decision, is the dominant determinant of surgical recommendation for this patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23576917      PMCID: PMC3565405     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  5 in total

Review 1.  The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them.

Authors:  Pat Croskerry
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality.

Authors:  G Gigerenzer; D G Goldstein
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 4.  Systematic errors in medical decision making: judgment limitations.

Authors:  N V Dawson; H R Arkes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Physician and medical student bias in evaluating diagnostic information.

Authors:  T S Wallsten
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.583

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.