Literature DB >> 23576032

Recovery of function following hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial comparing an accelerated versus standard physiotherapy rehabilitation programme.

Karen L Barker1, Meredith A Newman, Tamsin Hughes, Cath Sackley, Hemant Pandit, Amit Kiran, David W Murray.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify if a tailored rehabilitation programme is more effective than standard practice at improving function in patients undergoing metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Specialist orthopaedic hospital.
SUBJECTS: 80 men with a median age of 56 years.
INTERVENTIONS: Tailored post-operative physiotherapy programme compared with standard physiotherapy. MAIN OUTCOMES: Primary outcome - Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Secondary outcomes: Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), EuroQol (EQ-5D-3L) and UCLA activity score. Hip range of motion, hip muscle strength and patient selected goals were also assessed.
RESULTS: At one year the mean (SD) Oxford Hip Score of the intervention group was higher, 45.1 (5.3), than the control group, 39.6 (8.8). This was supported by a linear regression model, which detected a 5.8 unit change in Oxford Hip Score (p < 0.001), effect size 0.76. There was a statistically significant increase in Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score of 12.4% (p < 0.0005), effect size 0.76; UCLA activity score differed by 0.66 points (p < 0.019), effect size 0.43; EQ 5D showed an improvement of 0.85 (p < 0.0005), effect size 0.76. A total of 80% (32 of 40) of the intervention group fully met their self-selected goal compared with 55% (22 of 40) of the control group. Hip range of motion increased significantly; hip flexion by a mean difference 17.9 degrees (p < 0.0005), hip extension by 5.7 degrees (p < 0.004) and abduction by 4 degrees (p < 0.05). Muscle strength improved more in the intervention group but was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: A tailored physiotherapy programme improved self-reported functional outcomes and hip range of motion in patients undergoing hip resurfacing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; physiotherapy; randomized controlled trial; range of motion

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23576032     DOI: 10.1177/0269215513478437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  3 in total

1.  Capsulectomy vs capsulotomy in total hip arthroplasty. Clinical outcomes and proprioception evaluation: Study protocol for a randomized, controlled, double blinded trial.

Authors:  Marco Ometti; Leonardo Brambilla; Roberto Gatti; Andrea Tettamanti; Thomas La Cava; Pierluigi Pironti; Gianfranco Fraschini; Vincenzo Salini
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-09-12

2.  Activity levels following hip resurfacing arthroplasty: A tool to help manage patient expectations.

Authors:  Jack W Martin; Mark A Williams; Karen L Barker
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-07

3.  A comparison of multidisciplinary team residential rehabilitation with conventional outpatient care for the treatment of non-arthritic intra-articular hip pain in UK Military personnel - a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Russell J Coppack; James L Bilzon; Andrew K Wills; Ian M McCurdie; Laura Partridge; Alastair M Nicol; Alexander N Bennett
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.