Literature DB >> 23575956

Intentional binding in self-made and observed actions.

S K Poonian1, Ross Cunnington.   

Abstract

Sense of agency is the way in which we understand the causal relationships between our actions and sensory events. Agency is implicitly measured using intentional binding paradigms, where voluntary self-made actions and consequential sensory events are perceived as shifted closer together in time. However, a crucial question remains as to how we understand the relationship between others' actions and sensory events. Do we use similar binding processes as for our own actions? Previous attempts to investigate this phenomenon in others' have reached no clear consensus. Therefore, in an attempt to understand how we attribute the causal relationships between others' actions and sensory events, we investigated intentional binding in others' actions using an interval estimation paradigm. In a first experiment participants were required to make a button-press response to indicate the perceived interval between a self-made action and a tone, between a closely matched observed action and tone, and between two tones. For both self-made and observed actions, we found a significant perceived shortening of the interval between the actions and tones as compared with the interval between two tones, thus intentional binding was found for both self-made and observed actions. In a second experiment we validated the findings of the first by contrasting the perceived intervals between an observed action and tone with a matched visual-auditory stimulus and a tone. We again found a significant perceived shortening of the interval for observed action compared with the closely matched visual-auditory control stimulus. The occurrence of intentional binding when observing an action suggests we use similar processes to make causal attributions between our own actions, others' actions, and sensory events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23575956     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3505-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action.

Authors:  S J Blakemore; C D Frith; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  The perceived onset time of self- and other-generated actions.

Authors:  Andreas Wohlschläger; Patrick Haggard; Benno Gesierich; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-11

Review 3.  Mirror neurons: from discovery to autism.

Authors:  Giacomo Rizzolatti; Maddalena Fabbri-Destro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Sense of agency in joint action: influence of human and computer co-actors.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Preston Hall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Time warp: authorship shapes the perceived timing of actions and events.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Ebert; Daniel M Wegner
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2009-11-06

8.  Causal binding of actions to their effects.

Authors:  Marc J Buehner; Gruffydd R Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-09-02

9.  Feelings of control: contingency determines experience of action.

Authors:  James W Moore; David Lagnado; Darvany C Deal; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-12-24

10.  What are they up to? The role of sensory evidence and prior knowledge in action understanding.

Authors:  Valerian Chambon; Philippe Domenech; Elisabeth Pacherie; Etienne Koechlin; Pierre Baraduc; Chlöé Farrer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

1.  Explicit and implicit measures of body ownership and agency: affected by the same manipulations and yet independent.

Authors:  Ke Ma; Jue Qu; Liping Yang; Wenwen Zhao; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  The implicit sense of agency is not a perceptual effect but is a judgment effect.

Authors:  Nagireddy Neelakanteswar Reddy
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-11-09

3.  Freedom to act enhances the sense of agency, while movement and goal-related prediction errors reduce it.

Authors:  Riccardo Villa; Emmanuele Tidoni; Giuseppina Porciello; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-03-31

4.  Do implicit and explicit measures of the sense of agency measure the same thing?

Authors:  John A Dewey; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Interplay of agency and ownership: the intentional binding and rubber hand illusion paradigm combined.

Authors:  Niclas Braun; Jeremy D Thorne; Helmut Hildebrandt; Stefan Debener
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Predictive Mechanisms Are Not Involved the Same Way during Human-Human vs. Human-Machine Interactions: A Review.

Authors:  Aïsha Sahaï; Elisabeth Pacherie; Ouriel Grynszpan; Bruno Berberian
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Action and perception in social contexts: intentional binding for social action effects.

Authors:  Roland Pfister; Sukhvinder S Obhi; Martina Rieger; Dorit Wenke
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Social Transmission of Experience of Agency: An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Nima Khalighinejad; Bahador Bahrami; Emilie A Caspar; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-30

Review 9.  The Senses of Agency and Ownership: A Review.

Authors:  Niclas Braun; Stefan Debener; Nadine Spychala; Edith Bongartz; Peter Sörös; Helge H O Müller; Alexandra Philipsen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-16

10.  Time for Action: Verbal Action Cues Influence Temporal Binding.

Authors:  Tom G E Damen; Rick B van Baaren; Ap Dijksterhuis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.