Literature DB >> 23575414

Results of the First Italian External Quality Assurance Scheme for somatic EGFR mutation testing in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Nicola Normanno1, Carmine Pinto, Gianluigi Taddei, Marcello Gambacorta, Francesca Castiglione, Massimo Barberis, Claudio Clemente, Antonio Marchetti.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) and the Italian Society of Pathology and Cytology organized an external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for EGFR mutation testing in non-small-cell lung cancer.
METHODS: Ten specimens, including three small biopsies with known epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status, were validated in three referral laboratories and provided to 47 participating centers. The participants were requested to perform mutational analysis, using their usual method, and to submit results within a 4-week time frame. According to a predefined scoring system, two points were assigned to correct genotype and zero points to false-negative or false-positive results. The threshold to pass the EQA was set at higher than 18 of 20 points. Two rounds were preplanned.
RESULTS: All participating centers submitted the results within the time frame. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/sequencing was the main methodology used (n = 37 laboratories), although a few centers did use pyrosequencing (n = 8) or real-time PCR (n = 2). A significant number of analytical errors were observed (n = 20), with a high frequency of false-positive results (n = 16). The lower scores were obtained for the small biopsies. Fourteen of 47 centers (30%) that did not pass the first round, having a score less than or equal to 18 points, used PCR/sequencing, whereas 10 of 10 laboratories, using pyrosequencing or real-time PCR, passed the first round. Eight laboratories passed the second round. Overall, 41of 47 centers (87%) passed the EQA.
CONCLUSION: The results of the EQA for EGFR testing in non-small-cell lung cancer suggest that good quality EGFR mutational analysis is performed in Italian laboratories, although differences between testing methods were observed, especially for small biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23575414     DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31828c2b08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  13 in total

Review 1.  Endorsing good quality assurance practices in molecular pathology: risks and recommendations for diagnostic laboratories and external quality assessment providers.

Authors:  Lien Tembuyser; Elisabeth M C Dequeker
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Assessing standardization of molecular testing for non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a worldwide external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for EGFR mutation testing.

Authors:  S Patton; N Normanno; F Blackhall; S Murray; K M Kerr; M Dietel; M Filipits; S Benlloch; S Popat; R Stahel; E Thunnissen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  A comparative study of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation screening methods in use in 20 European clinical diagnostic laboratories.

Authors:  Gillian Ellison; Andrew Wallace; Alexander Kohlmann; Simon Patton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  External quality assessment for EGFR mutations in Italy: improvements in performances over the time.

Authors:  Nicola Normanno; Francesca Fenizia; Francesca Castiglione; Massimo Barberis; Gian Luigi Taddei; Mauro Truini; Gaetano De Rosa; Carmine Pinto; Antonio Marchetti
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2017-05-26

5.  The Italian external quality assessment for RAS testing in colorectal carcinoma identifies methods-related inter-laboratory differences.

Authors:  Nicola Normanno; Carmine Pinto; Francesca Castiglione; Francesca Fenizia; Massimo Barberis; Antonio Marchetti; Gabriella Fontanini; Gaetano De Rosa; Gian Luigi Taddei
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 5.531

6.  Detection of EGFR mutations by TaqMan mutation detection assays powered by competitive allele-specific TaqMan PCR technology.

Authors:  Cristin Roma; Claudia Esposito; Anna Maria Rachiglio; Raffaella Pasquale; Alessia Iannaccone; Nicoletta Chicchinelli; Renato Franco; Rita Mancini; Salvatore Pisconti; Antonella De Luca; Gerardo Botti; Alessandro Morabito; Nicola Normanno
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Guidance for laboratories performing molecular pathology for cancer patients.

Authors:  Ian A Cree; Zandra Deans; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Nicola Normanno; Anders Edsjö; Etienne Rouleau; Francesc Solé; Erik Thunnissen; Wim Timens; Ed Schuuring; Elisabeth Dequeker; Samuel Murray; Manfred Dietel; Patricia Groenen; J Han Van Krieken
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  High expression of cellular retinol binding protein-1 in lung adenocarcinoma is associated with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Elena Doldo; Gaetana Costanza; Amedeo Ferlosio; Eugenio Pompeo; Sara Agostinelli; Guido Bellezza; Donatella Mazzaglia; Alessandro Giunta; Angelo Sidoni; Augusto Orlandi
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2015-11

Review 9.  Diagnostic procedures for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): recommendations of the European Expert Group.

Authors:  Manfred Dietel; Lukas Bubendorf; Anne-Marie C Dingemans; Christophe Dooms; Göran Elmberger; Rosa Calero García; Keith M Kerr; Eric Lim; Fernando López-Ríos; Erik Thunnissen; Paul E Van Schil; Maximilian von Laffert
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  A stitch in time saves nine: external quality assessment rounds demonstrate improved quality of biomarker analysis in lung cancer.

Authors:  Cleo Keppens; Véronique Tack; Nils 't Hart; Lien Tembuyser; Ales Ryska; Patrick Pauwels; Karen Zwaenepoel; Ed Schuuring; Florian Cabillic; Luigi Tornillo; Arne Warth; Wilko Weichert; Elisabeth Dequeker
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.