TAR DNA-binding protein-43 (TDP-43) is the principal component of ubiquitinated inclusions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and the most common pathological subtype of frontotemporal dementia-frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43-positive inclusions (FTLD-TDP). To date, the C-terminus of TDP-43, which is aggregation-prone and contains almost all ALS-associated mutations, has garnered much attention while the functions of the N-terminus of TDP-43 remain largely unknown. To bridge this gap in our knowledge, we utilized novel cell culture and computer-assisted models to evaluate which region(s) of TDP-43 regulate its folding, self-interaction, biological activity and aggregation. We determined that the extreme N-terminus of TDP-43, specifically the first 10 residues, regulates folding of TDP-43 monomers necessary for proper homodimerization and TDP-43-regulated splicing. Despite such beneficial functions, we discovered an interesting dichotomy: full-length TDP-43 aggregation, which is believed to be a pathogenic process, also requires the extreme N-terminus of TDP-43. As such, we provide new insight into the structural basis for TDP-43 function and aggregation, and we suggest that stabilization of TDP-43 homodimers, the physiologically active form of TDP-43, may be a promising therapeutic strategy for ALS and FTLD-TDP.
TAR DNA-binding protein-43 (TDP-43) is the principal component of ubiquitinated inclusions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and the most common pathological subtype of frontotemporal dementia-frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43-positive inclusions (FTLD-TDP). To date, the C-terminus of TDP-43, which is aggregation-prone and contains almost all ALS-associated mutations, has garnered much attention while the functions of the N-terminus of TDP-43 remain largely unknown. To bridge this gap in our knowledge, we utilized novel cell culture and computer-assisted models to evaluate which region(s) of TDP-43 regulate its folding, self-interaction, biological activity and aggregation. We determined that the extreme N-terminus of TDP-43, specifically the first 10 residues, regulates folding of TDP-43 monomers necessary for proper homodimerization and TDP-43-regulated splicing. Despite such beneficial functions, we discovered an interesting dichotomy: full-length TDP-43 aggregation, which is believed to be a pathogenic process, also requires the extreme N-terminus of TDP-43. As such, we provide new insight into the structural basis for TDP-43 function and aggregation, and we suggest that stabilization of TDP-43 homodimers, the physiologically active form of TDP-43, may be a promising therapeutic strategy for ALS and FTLD-TDP.
Inclusions of TAR DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP-43) are a histological hallmark of frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43-positive inclusions (FTLD-TDP) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (1,2). While TDP-43 predominantly localizes to the nucleus under normal conditions, a substantial loss of nuclear TDP-43 and aberrant cytoplasmic TDP-43 inclusions marks neurons affected by disease. In such cases, TDP-43 exhibits a disease-specific biochemical signature, which includes its ubiquitination, phosphorylation and truncation (1,2). As a highly conserved heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP), TDP-43 plays roles in the regulation of DNA transcription, RNA splicing and degradation, as well as microRNA biogenesis and processing (3). TDP-43 contains four functional domains, which include a nuclear localization signal (NLS) and two RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) within the N-terminal half of the protein, as well as a nuclear export signal (NES) and a glycine-rich region in the C-terminal half. The NLS and NES regulate the shuttling of TDP-43 between the nucleus and the cytoplasm (4), while the RRM1 and RRM2 are responsible for binding to nucleic acids, such as UG repeats (5,6). The glycine-rich region mediates protein–protein interactions between TDP-43 and other hnRNP members (7). Since the C-terminal region of TDP-43 harbors almost all known ALS-associated TDP-43 mutations (8–15), and contains Q/N-rich domains that promote TDP-43 aggregation (16,17), research has mostly focused on the C-terminal region of TDP-43. As a result, the functions of TDP-43's N-terminal region remain largely unknown.We previously shed light on the importance of the N-terminus of TDP-43: we have shown that deletion of the first 75 amino acid residues of TDP-43 significantly reduces its biological activity, as measured using a cellular cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) exon 9 splicing assay (14). Moreover, we and others have demonstrated that TDP-43 molecules interact and their binding to one another leads to homodimer formation in vitro and within cells (14,15,18–20). Our data further indicated that deletion of the first 75 residues of TDP-43 dramatically reduces this self-interaction (14). Based on these findings, we sought to further define the region(s) of TDP-43 critical for its biological activity and self-interaction. The findings of the present study, emerging from both cellular models and computer-assisted modeling of TDP-43, suggest that the first 10 amino acid residues of TDP-43 are essential for proper monomer folding, homodimer formation and splicing activity. Indeed, deletion of these 10 residues, and even mutations of key residues within this sequence, impairs TDP-43 homodimer formation and result in the loss of TDP-43-regulated splicing. In contrast to the beneficial role of these 10 N-terminal residues in regulating TDP-43 function, our results also indicate that the extreme N-terminus of TDP-43 regulates full-length TDP-43 inclusion formation. Our findings provide greater insight into the dual functions of the extreme N-terminal region of TDP-43 in regulating TDP-43 conformation which influences its biological activity and inclusion formation. The stabilization of physiologically active TDP-43 homodimers to prevent their oligomerization may thus be a therapeutic strategy meriting consideration for the treatment of ALS and FTLD-TDP.
RESULTS
The first 10 N-terminal residues of TDP-43 are required for its splicing activity
One of the first recognized biological activities of TDP-43 was its ability to promote skipping of CFTR exon 9 (21), and it is now recognized that TDP-43 influences the splicing pattern of many mRNAs (22,23). As mentioned, we have demonstrated that deletion of the first 75 residues of TDP-43 (TDP-4376–414) significantly reduces its splicing activity (14). To further define the region(s) required for TDP-43 function, we generated various expression vectors encoding N-terminal deleted fragments of TDP-43 tagged with enhanced green fluorescence protein (GFP-TDP-435–414, GFP-TDP-4310–414, GFP-TDP-43Δ6–10, GFP-TDP-4315–414, GFP-TDP-4331–414, GFP-TDP-4346–414 and GFP-TDP-4361–414; Fig. 1A and Supplementary Material, Fig. S1A). HeLa cells were co-transfected to overexpress individual TDP-43 fragments and a CFTR mini-gene reporter construct. Two days after transfection, CFTR exon 9 skipping was examined by reverse-transcription PCR (RT–PCR) followed by visualization of transcripts that include (top band) or exclude (bottom band) exon 9 on an agarose gel (Fig. 1B and Supplementary Material, Fig. S1B). Expression of GFP-TDP-43 markedly increased exon 9 exclusion compared with the minor expression of CFTR exon 9 exclusion products present in cells expressing only GFP. Expression of all N-terminally truncated TDP-43 fragments led to a substantial decrease in exon 9 exclusion compared with full-length TDP-43 (Fig. 1B and Supplementary Material, Fig. S1B), despite comparable levels of expression (Fig. 1C and Supplementary Material, Fig. S1C) and nuclear localization (Fig. 1D and Supplementary Material, Fig. S1D). Similar results were observed when comparing splicing activity between non-tagged full-length TDP-43 and N-terminally deleted fragments (TDP-435–414 and TDP-4310–414; Supplementary Material, Fig. S1E). Note that, in contrast to the partial reduction in exon 9 skipping caused by TDP-435–414, exon 9 skipping was completely abolished upon expression of TDP-4310–414 and of other tested fragments (Fig. 1B, Supplementary Material, Fig. S1B and E), suggesting that the first 10 amino acid residues of TDP-43 are critical for its splicing activity.
Figure 1.
The first 10 N-terminal residues of TDP-43 are required for its biological activity. (A) Schematic representation of N-terminal GFP-tagged TDP-43 fragments co-transfected into HeLa cells with the CFTR mini-gene reporter construct. (B) Examination of CFTR exon 9 skipping by RT–PCR shows that, compared with exon 9-containing products in cells expressing GFP (top band), expression of GFP-TDP-43 significantly promotes exon 9 skipping (bottom band). In contrast, the N-terminal deleted TDP-43 fragments show a decreased ability to promote exon 9 exclusion. (C) Western blot analysis using an anti-GFP antibody confirmed that the examined GFP-tagged TDP-43 products were expressed at similar levels (* represents a nonspecific band). (D) Similar to full-length TDP-43, the examined TDP-43 fragments localized to the nucleus (Scale bar 10 μm).
The first 10 N-terminal residues of TDP-43 are required for its biological activity. (A) Schematic representation of N-terminal GFP-tagged TDP-43 fragments co-transfected into HeLa cells with the CFTR mini-gene reporter construct. (B) Examination of CFTR exon 9 skipping by RT–PCR shows that, compared with exon 9-containing products in cells expressing GFP (top band), expression of GFP-TDP-43 significantly promotes exon 9 skipping (bottom band). In contrast, the N-terminal deleted TDP-43 fragments show a decreased ability to promote exon 9 exclusion. (C) Western blot analysis using an anti-GFP antibody confirmed that the examined GFP-tagged TDP-43 products were expressed at similar levels (* represents a nonspecific band). (D) Similar to full-length TDP-43, the examined TDP-43 fragments localized to the nucleus (Scale bar 10 μm).
The first 10 N-terminal residues of TDP-43 are required for the formation of a functional TDP-43 homodimer
Several groups, including our own, have reported that TDP-43 molecules interact and their binding to one another results in the formation of homodimers (14,15,18–20). We thus investigated whether the first 10 N-terminal residues of TDP-43 mediate this self-interaction and whether formation of TDP-43 homodimers is critical for TDP-43 splicing activity. Intact, live HEK293T cells were treated with membrane-permeable disuccinimidyl glutarate (DSG), a homobifunctional NHS-ester cross-linking reagent widely used to study native protein structures (24–28). Treating cells with DSG prior to lysis allowed the preservation of TDP-43 structure and protein interactions found under physiological conditions. Upon analysis of TDP-43 by denaturing SDS–PAGE, it was observed that TDP-43 in non-cross-linked cells migrated at the expected molecular weight of a monomer (∼45 kDa), whereas the SDS-stable TDP-43 in DSG-treated cells migrated at the expected molecular weight of a homodimer (∼90 kDa) (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Material, Fig. S2A). The ∼90 kDa band immunoreactive for TDP-43 was not immunoreactive for hnRNP A2, a protein known to interact with TDP-43 (7,14) (Fig. 2A), suggesting that there is no significant cross-linking between TDP-43 and other proteins under these conditions. We found that treating purified recombinant TDP-43 protein with DSG also results in TDP-43 homodimerization and the generation of a 90 kDa band, further supporting the notion that the 90 kDa band consists of TDP-43 homodimers (Supplementary Material, Fig. S2A). In addition, TDP-43 immunoprecipitation studies using lysates from DSG-treated and non-treated HEK293T cells confirmed the existence of TDP-43 homodimers in live cells (Fig. 2C). Such TDP-43 homodimers were similarly observed in DSG-treated Hela cells, neuroblastoma M17 cells and mouse brain (Fig. 2B).
Figure 2.
The first 10 N-terminal residues of TDP-43 are required for the formation of a functional TDP-43 homodimer. (A) Live HEK293T cells were treated with DSG, a homobifunctional NHS-ester cross-linking reagent used to study native protein structures. Western blot analysis of endogenous TDP-43 using an antibody toward the C-terminus of TDP-43 (C-TDP-43) revealed that TDP-43 in non-cross-linked cells migrates at the expected molecular weight of a monomer (∼45 kDa), whereas TDP-43 in DSG-treated cells migrates at the expected molecular weight of a homodimer (∼90 kDa). Blots were also probed for: DJ-1, which is known to form homodimers; hnRNP A2, a protein that can interact with TDP-43; and GAPDH, to confirm equal loading among wells. (B) TDP-43 homodimers are also present in DSG-treated HeLa cells, M17 neuroblastoma cells and mouse brain lysate. (C) Immunoprecipitation of TDP-43 from DSG-treated cell lysates pulls down TDP-43 homodimers. (D) Similar to endogenous TDP-43, ectopic TDP-43WT or a TDP-43 C-terminal deletion fragment (TDP-431–273) form homodimers. In contrast, N-terminal deleted TDP-43 fragments (TDP-4310–414 or TDP-4376–414) do not form homodimers in DSG-treated cells. Note that the high-molecular weight material in DSG-treated cells likely consists of complexes formed of TDP-43 homodimers and bound DNA substrates. (E) Co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that GFP-TDP-43 and GFP-TDP-431–273 bind strongly to Flag-TDP-43. In contrast, GFP-TDP-4310–414 and GFP-TDP-4376–414 only weakly interact with Flag-TDP-43 (* represents a nonspecific IgG band).
The first 10 N-terminal residues of TDP-43 are required for the formation of a functional TDP-43 homodimer. (A) Live HEK293T cells were treated with DSG, a homobifunctional NHS-ester cross-linking reagent used to study native protein structures. Western blot analysis of endogenous TDP-43 using an antibody toward the C-terminus of TDP-43 (C-TDP-43) revealed that TDP-43 in non-cross-linked cells migrates at the expected molecular weight of a monomer (∼45 kDa), whereas TDP-43 in DSG-treated cells migrates at the expected molecular weight of a homodimer (∼90 kDa). Blots were also probed for: DJ-1, which is known to form homodimers; hnRNP A2, a protein that can interact with TDP-43; and GAPDH, to confirm equal loading among wells. (B) TDP-43 homodimers are also present in DSG-treated HeLa cells, M17 neuroblastoma cells and mouse brain lysate. (C) Immunoprecipitation of TDP-43 from DSG-treated cell lysates pulls down TDP-43 homodimers. (D) Similar to endogenous TDP-43, ectopic TDP-43WT or a TDP-43 C-terminal deletion fragment (TDP-431–273) form homodimers. In contrast, N-terminal deleted TDP-43 fragments (TDP-4310–414 or TDP-4376–414) do not form homodimers in DSG-treated cells. Note that the high-molecular weight material in DSG-treated cells likely consists of complexes formed of TDP-43 homodimers and bound DNA substrates. (E) Co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that GFP-TDP-43 and GFP-TDP-431–273 bind strongly to Flag-TDP-43. In contrast, GFP-TDP-4310–414 and GFP-TDP-4376–414 only weakly interact with Flag-TDP-43 (* represents a nonspecific IgG band).Note that levels of the TDP-43 homodimers in cells increased dose-dependently upon DSG treatment (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Material, Fig. S2A), and TDP-43 retained its normal nuclear localization (Supplementary Material, Fig. S2B). Consistent with previous findings (24,29), DSG treatment also stabilized DJ-1 homodimers, the native form of DJ-1 in cells (26,30,31), validating our experimental conditions were sufficient to stabilize native protein structures. Indeed, high-dose DSG treatment (1000 μM) was found to significantly increase levels of TDP-43 and DJ-1 homodimers while simultaneously decreasing their monomeric forms (Supplementary Material, Fig. S2A). Since the low dose of DSG (100 µM) is expected to minimize nonspecific cross-linking between TDP-43 and other proteins and its DNA substrates, this dose was used in subsequent studies. Taken together, our cross-linking data are consistent with previous studies (14,15,18–20) and support the notion that native TDP-43 homodimers exist in cells.Next, to determine whether the extreme N-terminus of TDP-43 modulates homodimer formation, we generated expression vectors encoding untagged N-terminal deleted TDP-43 fragments (TDP-4310–414 and TDP-4376–414) or a C-terminal deleted fragment (TDP-431–273). Cells were transfected with these constructs following knockdown of endogenous TDP-43 by RNA interference (siRNA). Following DSG treatment to cross-link TDP-43, cell homogenates were analyzed by western blot as above. Similar to endogenous TDP-43, ectopically expressed wild-type TDP-43 (TDP-43WT) and TDP-431–273 formed homodimers in cells (Fig. 2D); however, TDP-43 products lacking N-terminal residues (TDP-4310–414 or TDP-4376–414) did not (Fig. 2D). To further confirm the extreme N-terminus of TDP-43 regulates its self-interaction, co-immunoprecipitation experiments were performed in which HEK293T cells were cotransfected with Flag-TDP-43 and either GFP-TDP-43, GFP-TDP-431–273, GFP-TDP-4310–414, or GFP-TDP-4376–414. Immunoprecipitation of Flag-TDP-43 followed by probing for GFP revealed that Flag-TDP-43 bound strongly to GFP-TDP-43 and to the C-terminal deletion product GFP-TDP-431–273. In contrast, GFP-TDP-4310–414 and GFP-TDP-4376–414 only weakly interacted with Flag-TDP-43, despite comparable expression levels in cell lysates, suggesting that the N-terminus of TDP-43 regulates homodimer formation (Fig. 2E). Of importance, TDP-4310–414 and TDP-4376–414 also lost their ability to regulate splicing of the CFTR mini-gene (Supplementary Material, Fig. S2C), as did the GFP-tagged N-terminal TDP-43 deletion products shown above (Fig. 1), despite their normal nuclear localization (Supplementary Material, Fig. S2D). These findings suggest that the extreme N-terminus of TDP-43 is required for both TDP-43 homodimer formation and TDP-43-regulated splicing in cells.Finally, since it has been reported that RNA is required for the interaction of TDP-43 and ATXN2 (32), we examined whether formation of TDP-43 homodimers is similarly dependent on its DNA/RNA binding activity. To this end, five conserved Phe residues (147, 149, 194, 229 and 231) in the RRM domains of TDP-43 were mutated to Leu (TDP-435), which has previously been shown to abolish the ability of TDP-43 to bind DNA/RNA in vitro and within cells (6,32,33). We observed that TDP-435 formed homodimers to the same extent as TDP-43WT in DSG-treated cells (Supplementary Material, Fig. S2E), suggesting that the formation of TDP-43 homodimers is independent of DNA/RNA binding.
Arg6, Val7, Thr8 and Glu9 are required for proper folding and homodimerization of TDP-43
To understand how the structure of the extreme N-terminus of TDP-43 affects homodimer formation, computer-assisted modeling was utilized. The humanTDP-43 protein contains four distinct regions: N-terminal region, RRM1, RRM2 domain, and C-terminal region (Fig. 3A). Our modeling of a full-length TDP-43 monomer, bound or not to DNA/RNA, provided structures in closed and open conformations (Fig. 3A and Supplementary Material, Fig. S3). While the structures of the extreme N-terminal region of TDP-43 are identical in both conformations, the closed conformation was used for the present study given its greater stability (Fig. 3A and Supplementary Material, Movie S1). Overall, our model showed that the structural arrangement of the TDP-43 protein is quite distinct and flexible in certain regions. The structure of the N-terminus has a minor loop/flexible region between the N-terminus and RRM1 around residues 101–106. The RRM1 and RRM2 domains are relatively fixed in arrangement to each other, while a larger loop/flexible region exists between RRM2 and the C-terminus domain at residues 273–280.
Figure 3.
Arg6, Val7, Thr8 and Glu9 are required for TDP-43 homodimerization and splicing regulation. (A) Computer-assisted modeling of full-length monomeric TDP-43 in the closed conformation showing TDP-43’s four distinct regions: N-terminal domain, RRM1 domain, RRM2 domain and C-terminal domain. (B) The interactions of Arg6, Val7, Thr8 and Glu9 with Phe35 stabilize the N-terminal β-sheet-like structures within the N-terminal region. (C) Schematic representation of untagged TDP-43 mutants used for transfection into HEK293T cells. (D) Compared with TDP-43WT, homodimer formation in DSG-treated cells is impaired upon expression of TDP-43R6GV7G and TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G, as assessed by western blot using an antibody toward the C-terminus of TDP-43 (C-TDP-43). (E) Similarly, TDP-43R6GV7G and TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G do not effectively promote exon 9 exclusion of the CFTR mini-gene reporter, as does TDP-43WT. (F) Western blot analysis confirmed that the examined TDP-43 products were expressed at similar levels. (G) The TDP-43 mutants exhibit normal nuclear distribution similar to TDP-43WT (Scale bar 10 μm).
Arg6, Val7, Thr8 and Glu9 are required for TDP-43 homodimerization and splicing regulation. (A) Computer-assisted modeling of full-length monomeric TDP-43 in the closed conformation showing TDP-43’s four distinct regions: N-terminal domain, RRM1 domain, RRM2 domain and C-terminal domain. (B) The interactions of Arg6, Val7, Thr8 and Glu9 with Phe35 stabilize the N-terminal β-sheet-like structures within the N-terminal region. (C) Schematic representation of untagged TDP-43 mutants used for transfection into HEK293T cells. (D) Compared with TDP-43WT, homodimer formation in DSG-treated cells is impaired upon expression of TDP-43R6GV7G and TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G, as assessed by western blot using an antibody toward the C-terminus of TDP-43 (C-TDP-43). (E) Similarly, TDP-43R6GV7G and TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G do not effectively promote exon 9 exclusion of the CFTR mini-gene reporter, as does TDP-43WT. (F) Western blot analysis confirmed that the examined TDP-43 products were expressed at similar levels. (G) The TDP-43 mutants exhibit normal nuclear distribution similar to TDP-43WT (Scale bar 10 μm).Since our data indicated that the N-terminus of TDP-43 are required for its self-interaction and splicing activity, we focused our attention on the structure of this region. As shown in Figure 3A, the N-terminal region has several β-sheet-like motifs within the first 60 amino acid residues, punctuated by key Pro residues at positions 15 and 19. Forming portions of the inter-strand β-sheet-like structure are residues 6–13 that interact with residues 35–39, as well as residues 39–45 that interact with residues 52–57. Between residues 25 and 32 is a short helical segment that connects across the β-sheet-like structure. Likewise, between residues 57 and 62 is a brief helical segment adjoining the β-sheet minor domain with the final helical element (Asp89-Val100) before the RRM1 domain begins around residue 101. Of particular relevance to the current study, there are strong intra-strand interactions that form in the initial 11 amino acid residues of TDP-43. Specifically, residues Arg6, Val7, Thr8 and Glu9 form strong intra-strand interactions with Phe35 (Fig. 3B and Supplementary Material, Movie S1). Therefore, we additionally characterized the structure of TDP-4310–414 (deletion of residues 2–9), and observed that, compared with full-length TDP-43 (Supplementary Material, Movie S2), the absence of residues 2–9 in TDP-4310–414 resulted in a loss of domain structure integrity and subsequent uncoiling of that region of the protein (Supplementary Material, Movie S3).In addition to evaluating the role of the N-terminus in maintaining proper folding of the TDP-43 monomer, we investigated whether the extreme N-terminus of TDP-43 is crucial for homodimer formation. Based on the predictions from YASARA and PRIME on likely regions of dimerization, we derived three optimal models (Supplementary Material, Fig. S4 and Supplementary Material, Table S1). Examination of key residues interacting between the monomers in all three models clearly showed that the amino acid residues in the N-terminus of TDP-43 are critical for interactions necessary to maintain the structure of the homodimer interface. Thus, computer modeling of TDP-43 monomers and homodimers highlights that residues in the N-terminus of TDP-43 are critical for both proper monomer folding and homodimerization.In light of the putative role of residues Arg6, Val7, Thr8 and Glu9 in monomeric TDP-43 folding, we tested whether mutating these residues to Gly would consequently affect TDP-43 homodimer formation and function. Based on computer-modeling, we found that, compared with TDP-43WT (Supplementary Material, Movie S4), TDP-43R6GV7G and TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G mutants are less stable in the first 40 amino acids (Supplementary Material, Movies S5 and S6). As a result, our data suggest proper monomer folding, and thereby homodimer formation of these TDP-43 species may be impaired.To examine this in cells, HEK293T cells were transfected to overexpress TDP-43R6GV7G or TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G under the conditions of endogenous TDP-43 knockdown (schematic of expression constructs shown in Fig. 3C). As above, DSG treatment to cross-link TDP-43 led to the formation of TDP-43 homodimers in cells expressing TDP-43WT (Fig. 3D). However, the levels of cross-linked homodimers were significantly decreased in cells overexpressing TDP-43R6GV7G or TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G (Fig. 3D), indicating that disruption of the N-terminal β-strand structure of TDP-43 inhibits homodimer formation. In addition, compared with the levels of CFTR exon 9 exclusion in cells transfected with TDP-43WT, TDP-43 mutants partially (TDP-43R6GV7G) or completely (TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G) lost their ability to regulate splicing (Fig. 3E), despite comparable levels of expression (Fig. 3F) and normal nuclear localization (Fig. 3G). Of note, the splicing activity of TDP-43 correlated with levels of TDP-43 homodimers, thus supporting the notion that dimerization is integral to the biological function of TDP-43, at least with respect to its role in regulating certain splicing events. Taken together, these findings provide additional evidence that the extreme N-terminal region of TDP-43 is required to maintain its structure and splicing activity.
The extreme N-terminus of TDP-43 regulates the aggregation of full-length TDP-43
To investigate the potential role of TDP-43’s extreme N-terminus in disease pathogenesis, we examined whether the first 10 amino acid residues of TDP-43 are necessary for the aggregation of full-length TDP-43. To this end, we utilized expression vectors encoding full-length TDP-43, TDP-4310–414 or TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G containing mutations (K82A, R83A, K84A) in the NLS (GFP-TDP-43NLSm, GFP-TDP-4310–414-NLSm and GFP-TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G-NLSm). Consistent with previous reports (4,32,34), ectopic expression of GFP-TDP-43NLSm led to the formation of cytoplasmic TDP-43 inclusions in cells, as examined by confocal fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 4A). In contrast, the majority of GFP-TDP-4310–414-NLSm and GFP-TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G-NLSm was diffusely distributed in the cytoplasm (Fig. 4A).
Figure 4.
The extreme N-terminus of TDP-43 is required for aggregation of full-length TDP-43. (A) The ectopic expression of GFP-TDP-43NLSm leads to the formation of cytoplasmic TDP-43 inclusions in cells, as examined by confocal fluorescence microscopy. In contrast, deletion of the extreme N-terminus of TDP-43, or mutations in key N-terminal residues, impairs inclusion formation such that GFP-TDP-4310–414-NLSm and GFP-TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G-NLSm remain diffusely localized to the cytoplasm (Scale bar 5 μm). (B) The cytoplasmic TDP-43 inclusions composed of GFP-TDP-43NLSm (green) sequester Myc-tagged TDP-43WT in cytoplasmic inclusions (red). In contrast, TDP-43WT-Myc remains in the nucleus of cells expressing GFP-TDP-4310–414-NLSm or GFP-TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G-NLSm (Scale bar 5 μm).
The extreme N-terminus of TDP-43 is required for aggregation of full-length TDP-43. (A) The ectopic expression of GFP-TDP-43NLSm leads to the formation of cytoplasmic TDP-43 inclusions in cells, as examined by confocal fluorescence microscopy. In contrast, deletion of the extreme N-terminus of TDP-43, or mutations in key N-terminal residues, impairs inclusion formation such that GFP-TDP-4310–414-NLSm and GFP-TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G-NLSm remain diffusely localized to the cytoplasm (Scale bar 5 μm). (B) The cytoplasmic TDP-43 inclusions composed of GFP-TDP-43NLSm (green) sequester Myc-tagged TDP-43WT in cytoplasmic inclusions (red). In contrast, TDP-43WT-Myc remains in the nucleus of cells expressing GFP-TDP-4310–414-NLSm or GFP-TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G-NLSm (Scale bar 5 μm).Given that cytoplasmic TDP-43 inclusions sequester full-length, normally nuclear, TDP-43 (4), we next co-transfected cells to overexpress Myc-tagged TDP-43WT and either GFP-TDP-43NLSm, GFP-TDP-4310–414-NLSm or GFP-TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G-NLSm (Fig. 4B). TDP-43WT-Myc localized primarily to the nucleus when overexpressed alone, but was sequestered into cytoplasmic inclusions when co-expressed with GFP-TDP-43NLSm (Fig. 4B). Conversely, TDP-43WT-Myc maintained its nuclear distribution in cells overexpressing diffuse, cytosolic GFP-TDP-4310–414-NLSm or GFP-TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G-NLSm (Fig. 4B), again displaying that, under conditions that mimic disease, the first 10 residues of TDP-43 are necessary for the sequestration and aggregation of full-length TDP-43.Finally, we sought to determine whether GFP-TDP-43NLSm, GFP-TDP-4310–414-NLSm and GFP-TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G-NLSm form aggregates and impair neuronal outgrowth in primary cultured neurons. We observed that transducing primary cortical neurons with rAAV1-GFP-TDP-43NLSm for 5 days resulted in the formation of cytoplasmic inclusions within the soma and neurites (Fig. 5A). In contrast, the expression of GFP-TDP-4310–414-NLSm or GFP-TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G-NLSm resulted in the diffuse distribution of TDP-43 in neurons (Fig. 5A). Notably, compared with GFP expression, expression of GFP-TDP-43NLSm resulted in a reduction of neurite outgrowth (Fig. 5A and B). However, neurite outgrowth was not affected by GFP-TDP-4310–414-NLSm and GFP-TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G-NLSm expression (Fig. 5A and B), suggesting that impaired neurite outgrowth is caused by cytoplasmic TDP-43 inclusions but not diffusely expressed cytoplasmic TDP-43.
Figure 5.
The extreme N-terminus of TDP-43 mediates full-length TDP-43 aggregation. (A) At day in vitro 4, primary cortical neurons plated on coverslips were transduced with rAAV1-GFP, rAAV1-GFP-TDP-43NLSm, rAAV1-GFP-TDP-4310–414-NLSm or GFP-TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G-NLSm. Five days post-infection, cells were immunostained for the neuronal marker, microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2), and coverslips were examined by fluorescence confocal microscopy. Green = GFP; red = MAP2; blue = Hoechst (nuclear stain). Exogenously expressed TDP-43NLSm formed cytoplasmic TDP-43 inclusions in neurons. In contrast, TDP-4310–414-NLSm and TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G-NLSm showed diffuse distribution similar to GFP (Scale bar 10 μm). (B) The cytoplasmic TDP-43 inclusions composed of TDP-43NLSm impaired neurite outgrowth. Data from three separate experiments were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post-hoc analysis (***P < 0.001).
The extreme N-terminus of TDP-43 mediates full-length TDP-43 aggregation. (A) At day in vitro 4, primary cortical neurons plated on coverslips were transduced with rAAV1-GFP, rAAV1-GFP-TDP-43NLSm, rAAV1-GFP-TDP-4310–414-NLSm or GFP-TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G-NLSm. Five days post-infection, cells were immunostained for the neuronal marker, microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2), and coverslips were examined by fluorescence confocal microscopy. Green = GFP; red = MAP2; blue = Hoechst (nuclear stain). Exogenously expressed TDP-43NLSm formed cytoplasmic TDP-43 inclusions in neurons. In contrast, TDP-4310–414-NLSm and TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G-NLSm showed diffuse distribution similar to GFP (Scale bar 10 μm). (B) The cytoplasmic TDP-43 inclusions composed of TDP-43NLSm impaired neurite outgrowth. Data from three separate experiments were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post-hoc analysis (***P < 0.001).
DISCUSSION
Since the discovery of TDP-43 as the major component of ubiquitinated inclusions in FTLD-TDP and ALSpatients (1,2), much research has aimed to better understand the normal functions of TDP-43 and its role in disease pathogenesis. The accumulation of cytoplasmic TDP-43 inclusions may be toxic to neurons, while abnormal post-translational modifications of TDP-43 and its sequestration into inclusions are expected to result in a loss of TDP-43 function. Functions of TDP-43 include the regulation of DNA transcription, microRNA processing, as well as RNA splicing (3). With regards to the latter, we previously demonstrated that the first 75 residues of TDP-43 are required for the protein's normal biological activity (14). The purpose of the present study was to hone in on the specific N-terminal region(s) required for a proper TDP-43 structure, function and aggregation. Our findings suggest that the first 10 amino acid residues of TDP-43 are critical for TDP-43 monomer folding and thus homodimerization, which is necessary for TDP-43-regulated splicing. The extreme N-terminus of TDP-43, however, may function as a double-edged sword; in addition to its vital role in regulating TDP-43 function, the same region is necessary for full-length TDP-43 inclusion formation. A better understanding of what factors may tip the balance between normal TDP-43 homodimerization and TDP-43 oligomerization is an area meriting more attention.
The extreme N-terminus of TDP-43 stabilizes its monomeric structure and mediates TDP-43 homodimerization
Upon evaluating the biological activity of a series of N-terminally deleted TDP-43 products using a cellular CFTR slicing assay, we determined that the first 10 amino acid residues of this protein are critical for its role in regulating splicing. These same 10 residues are required for TDP-43 monomer folding, and homodimerization within cells, as assessed by DSG-induced cross-linking to preserve the integrity of TDP-43 physiological structures. SDS-stable TDP-43 homodimers were observed in various human cell lines and in mouse brain, as well as in vitro using recombinant TDP-43. These results are consistent with previous studies, demonstrating that TDP-43 interacts with itself to form a homodimer in vitro and in cells (14,15,18–20). While TDP-43WT and a C-terminal deleted TDP-43 fragment (TDP-431–273) formed homodimers in cells, N-terminal deleted TDP-43 fragments (TDP-4310–414 or TDP-4376–414) showed markedly impaired homodimer formation. In addition, co-immunoprecipitation studies further revealed that TDP-43 homodimerization is dependent on the N-terminal region of TDP-43. Of interest, compared with TDP-43WT, both the C-terminal deleted fragment (TDP-431–273) and the N-terminal deleted fragments (TDP-4310–414 or TDP-4376–414) lost their ability to promote CFTR exon 9 exclusion. This finding is in agreement with previous reports, showing that the glycine-rich C-terminal domain of TDP-43 mediates its binding to hnRNPA/B proteins and the formation of hnRNP-rich complexes necessary for TDP-43 activity (7). Of importance, our data strongly suggest that the active form of TDP-43, at least when regulating splicing, is a homodimer.The novel use of computer-assisted modeling of TDP-43 allowed us to highlight the importance of the N-terminal region in maintaining monomeric and homodimeric TDP-43 structures. Indeed, these models revealed that the extreme N-terminus of TDP-43 is critical for proper monomeric TDP-43 folding. Deletion of residues 2–9 (TDP-4310–414) results in a loss of domain structure integrity and subsequent uncoiling of that region of the protein, and therefore destabilizes the β-sheets characteristic of the first 60 amino acids. Since the extreme N-terminal region of TDP-43 is important for monomer folding, changing its structure would disrupt the proper folding, and subsequently alter homodimer formation. To evaluate the importance of the extreme N-terminus for the TDP-43 structure in a cellular model, cells were made to express TDP-43 mutated at residues 6–9, TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G. As expected, these mutations abolished TDP-43 homodimer formation, resulting in the loss of TDP-43-regulated CFTR exon 9 splicing, which further validated that the extreme N-terminus of TDP-43 is critical for stabilizing TDP-43 in its active, homodimeric conformation. TDP-43 homodimer models revealed that key N-terminal residues are also critical to stabilize the interactions between the two monomers forming the homodimer. Consistent with these findings, a recent study has shown that the N-terminus of TDP-43 is an ordered structure and acts as an oligomerization domain (35). Although our computer-based structural models need to be confirmed by TDP-43 crystal structures, our findings provide insight into understanding the relationship between physiological TDP-43 structures and biological activity.
The N-terminus of TDP-43 and disease pathogenesis
It is widely believed that the glycine-rich C-terminal domain of TDP-43, which also contains prion-related domains rich in Glu and Asp residues, is aggregation-prone and crucial for inclusion formation (16,17). We and others have shown that C-terminal fragments of TDP-43 (e.g. TDP-43220–414) readily aggregate in various cell lines (13–15). In contrast, full-length, nuclear TDP-43 is much less prone to aggregate in cultured cells. Nonetheless, preventing the nuclear import of full-length TDP-43 by mutating the NLS causes it to aggregate into insoluble cytoplasmic inclusions (4,32,34). These aggregates sequester wild-type, nuclear TDP-43, thus depleting TDP-43 from the nucleus (4). Since a recent study has shown that the N-terminal domain of TDP-43 alone is capable of oligomer formation in vitro (35), we examined whether the extreme N-terminus of TDP-43 influences TDP-43 aggregation in cultured cells and primary neurons. Consistent with previous reports (4,32,34), TDP-43 cytoplasmic inclusions were formed in cells expressing the TDP-43NLSm. However, TDP-43NLSm lacking extreme N-terminal residues (TDP-4310–414-NLSm) or bearing mutations to key N-terminal residues (TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G) showed diffuse cytoplasmic distribution. Of note, inclusions formed by TDP-43NLSm sequestered TDP-43WT. In contrast, given the inability of TDP-4310–414-NLSm and TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G to aggregate, sequestration of TDP-43WT was not possible. Moreover, expression of GFP-TDP-43NLSm, but not of GFP-TDP-4310–414-NLSm or GFP-TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G-NLSm, resulted in a reduction of neurite outgrowth. These results suggest that the extreme N-terminal region of TDP-43 is required for the aggregation of full-length TDP-43, a consequence of which is impaired neurite outgrowth.Taken together, we shed new light on the functions of TDP-43's extreme N-terminus under physiological and pathological conditions. Our findings indicate that the extreme N-terminal region of TDP-43 is crucial for maintaining the normal conformation and biological activity of TDP-43 under physiological conditions. In disease, however, TDP-43 accumulates in the cytosol, perhaps in response to various stressors (36,37). Once in the cytosol, our data would suggest that the extreme N-terminal region of TDP-43 mediates full-length TDP-43 oligomerization and aggregate formation. This would result in a loss of functional TDP-43 due to sequestration of wild-type TDP-43 into insoluble inclusions, and perhaps a toxic gain of function resulting from the generation of TDP-43 oligomers and aggregates. In summary, we have uncovered an intriguing dichotomy: the extreme N-terminal region of TDP-43 regulates normal TDP-43 structure and function, but it may also participate in driving neurodegeneration in TDP-43 proteinopathies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Computer-assisted modeling of TDP-43 structures
The studies of computer-assisted modeling of TDP-43 structures are detailed in Supplementary Material.
Generation of TDP-43 plasmids
Full-length humanTDP-43 complementary DNA (cDNA) from GFP-TDP-43 constructs (14) was used as the PCR template to generate N-terminal deleted TDP-43 constructs. The cDNA of fragments encoding TDP-435–414, TDP-4310–414, TDP-4315–414, TDP-4331–414, TDP-4346–414 and TDP-4361–414 was generated by PCR. The upstream primers were: TDP-435–414: 5′-CGGGATCCATGATTCGGGTAACCGAAGATGAG-3′; TDP-4310–414: 5′-CGGGATCCATGGATGAGAACGATGAGCCCATTG-3′; TDP-4315–414: 5′-CGGGATCCATGCCCATTGAAATACCATCGG-3′; TDP-4331–414: 5′-CGGGATCCATGGTTACAGCCCAGTTTCCAGG-3′; TDP-4346–414: 5′-CGGGATCCATGCCAGTGTCTCAGTGTATGAG-3′; TDP-4361–414: 5′-CGGGATCCATGCTGCATGCCCCAGATGCTGG-3′. The downstream primer was 5′-GCTCTAGACTACATTCCCCAGCCAGAAGAC-3′; The PCR product was sub-cloned into the pEGFP-C1 vector (N-terminally GFP-tagged, Clontech) or pcDNA5/TO (untagged, Invitrogen) using restriction sites BamHI and XbaI. The primers for PAG-3 plasmids encoding untagged TDP-43 were: wild-type TDP-43: 5′-AGTGAAGCTTGCCACCATGTCTGAATATATTCGG-3′ and 5′-TCATCTCGAGCTACATTCCCCAGCCAGAAG-3′; TDP-431–273: 5′-AGTGAAGCTTGCCACCATGTCTGAATATATTCGG-3′ and 5′-TCATCTCGAGCTAACTTCTTTCTAACTGTC-3′; TDP-4310–414: 5′-AGTGAAGCTTGCCACCATGGATGAGAACGATGAGCCC-3′ and 5′-TCATCTCGAGCTACATTCCCCAGCCAGAAG-3′; TDP-4376–414: 5′-AGTGAAGCTTGCCACCATGAACTATCCAAAAGATAAC-3′ and 5′-TCATCTCGAGCTACATTCCCCAGCCAGAAG-3′. The sequence of all plasmids was verified by sequence analysis.
Site-directed mutagenesis of TDP-43
Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using a Quikchange kit (Strategene). Wild-type TDP-43 in the pcDNA5/TO vector was used as a template to create the TDP-43 mutants. The primers used were: S2A: 5′- GAGCTCGGATCCATGGCTGAATATATTCGG-3′ and 5′-CCGAATATATTCAGCCATGGATCCGAGCTC-3′; S2D: 5′-CCGAGCTCGGATCCATGGATGAATATATTCGGGTAAC-3′ and 5′-GTTACCCGAATATATTCATCCATGGATCCGAGCTCGG-3′; Y4F: 5′-GGATCCATGTCTGAATTTATTCGGGTAACCGAAG-3′ and 5′-CTTCGGTTACCCGAATAAATTCAGACATGGATCC-3′; Y4D: 5′-GATCCATGTCTGAAGATATTCGGGTAACCG-3′ and 5′-CGGTTACCCGAATATCTTCAGACATGGATC-3′; Y4FT8A: 5′-CATGTCTGAATTTATTCGGGTAGCCGAAGATGAGAACGA-3′ and 5′-TCGTTCTCATCTTCGGCTACCCGAATAAATTCAGACATG-3′; Y4DT8E: 5′- ATGTCTGAAGATATTCGGGTAGAGGAAGATGAGAACGATGAGCCC-3′ and 5′-GGGCTCATCGTTCTCATCTTCCTCTACCCGAATATCTTCAGACAT-3′; R6GV7G: 5′-CTCGGATCCATGTCTGAATATATTGGGGGAACCGAAGATGAG-3′ and 5′-CTCATCTTCGGTTCCCCCAATATATTCAGACATGGATCCGAG-3′; R6GV7GT8GE9G: 5′-CATGTCTGAATATATTGGGGGAGGCGGAGATGAGAACGATGAGCC-3′ and 5′-GGCTCATCGTTCTCATCTCCGCCTCCCCCAATATATTCAGACATG-3′. The mutations were verified by sequence analysis.
In-cell cross-linking
In-cell cross-linking was performed by using DSG as previously described (38). DSG is a membrane-permeable small molecule widely used to stabilize the native structures of proteins (24–28) and protein–DNA complexes (39–42) in living cells, and can thus gain access to the nucleus by passive diffusion to stabilize TDP-43 homodimers. In brief, HEK293T, HeLa and M17 cells were harvested and washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4). Cells were re-suspended in 100 μl PBS. DSG (ProteoChem, Inc, c1104) stocks were prepared in dry DMSO. The reaction was initiated by adding 1 μl of a DSG stock to the 100 μl cell suspension at a final concentration of 12.5, 25, 50 or 100 μm. After 30 min of shacking at room temperature, the reaction was quenched by adding 2 μl of 1m Tris base solution at a final concentration of 20 mm for 15 min. Cells were then lysed in buffer (50 mm Tris–HCl, pH 7.4, 300 mm NaCl, 1% Triton-X-100, 5 mm EDTA, 1% SDS, plus phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and both a protease and phosphatase inhibitor mixture). After centrifugation at 16 000g for 20 min at 4°C, the supernatant was saved for western blot analysis. To map the critical protein sequence for TDP-43 homodimerization, HEK293T cells were transected with 1 μg wild-type TDP-43, TDP-43 fragments (TDP-431–274, TDP-4310–414 or TDP-4376–414) or TDP-43 mutants (TDP-43Y4FT8A, TDP-43Y4DT8E, TDP-43R6GV7G or TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Four hours after transfection, cells were treated with siTDP-43 targeting the 3′ UTR of endogenous TDP-43. Forty-eight hours post-treatment, cells were harvested for in-cell cross-linking, as described above.
Cell culture and Immunofluorescence
HEK293T cells grown on glass coverslips were transfected with 0.3 μg of an expression vector (GFP-TDP-43NLSm, GFP-TDP-4310–414NLSm) in the absence or presence of TDP-43-Myc (0.5 µg) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Twenty-four hours post-transfection, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (4°C, 15 min) and permeabilized with PBS-0.5% Triton X-100 for 10 min. After blocking with 5% non-fat milk for 1 h at 37°C, the cells were incubated overnight at 4°C with mouse monoclonal anti-Myc (1:500, Roche, 9E10). After washing, the cells were incubated with the Alexa 568-conjugated donkey anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:500, Molecular Probes) at 37°C for 2 h. To determine whether DSG treatment induces the mislocalization of TDP-43, HEK293T cells were treated with DSG (100 μm) for 30 min. The reaction was quenched by a Tris base, and the cells were subjected to immunofluorescence analysis using the rabbit polyclonal TDP-43 antibody (1:2000, Proteintech, 12892-1-AP) and the Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:1000, Molecular Probes). Hoechst 33258 (1 μg/ml, Invitrogen) was used to stain cellular nuclei. Images were obtained on a Zeiss LSM 510 META confocal microscope.
Western blot analysis
Samples were prepared in Laemmli's buffer, heated for 5 min at 95°C, and equal amounts of protein were loaded into 3–8% Tris–acetate gels for TDP-43 analysis, 4–20% Tris–glycine gels for DJ-1 analysis or 10% Tris–glycine gels for other proteins of interest. After transfer, blots were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline - 0.1% Triton X-100 (TBST) for 1 h, then incubated with a rabbit polyclonal GFP antibody (1:2000, Invitrogen), rabbit polyclonal TDP-43 (Proteintech, 10728-2-AP), rabbit polyclonal TDP-43 antibody (Proteintech, 12892-1-AP), rabbit DJ-1antibody (Cell Signaling, #5933), mouse monoclonal hnRNP-A2 antibody (Sigma, R4653) or mouse monoclonal GAPDH antibody (1:10000, Biodesign) overnight at 4°C. Membranes were washed in TBST, then incubated with donkey anti-rabbit, anti-mouse or anti-goat IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1:5000; Jackson ImmunoResearch) for 1 h. Protein expression was visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence treatment and exposure to a film.
RNA extraction and semi-quantitative RT–PCR
The CFTR mini-gene splicing assay was conducted as previously described (14,43). In brief, HeLa cells were co-transfected with 1 µg of a mini-gene construct and 1 or 2 µg of GFP-TDP-43 constructs or untagged TDP-43 constructs. After 48 h, the cells were harvested and total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plus Mini kit (Qiagen). Then, 2 µg of total RNA was used to synthesize cDNA with the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems). For the PCR, 2 µl of cDNA was used in a 20 µl of reaction according to the manufacturer's protocol for a Taq PCR Core kit (Qiagen). The amplification conditions consisted of an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 62°C for 60 s, and 72°C for 90 s. The PCR products were run on 1% agarose gels for 30 min at 135 volts.
Immunoprecipitation
For immunoprecipitation studies, HEK293T cells were treated with 100 µm DSG and cells were lysed using Co-IP buffer (50 mm Tris–HCl, pH 7.4, 300 mm NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 5 mm EDTA) containing PMSF as well as protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Lysates were sonicated and centrifuged at 16 000g for 20 min. The protein concentration of supernatants was determined by BCA assay (Thermo Scientific). The supernatant containing 300 μg of total protein was pre-cleaned with Dynabeads® Protein G (Invitrogen), and then combined with 1.5 μl of anti-TDP-43 antibody (Proteintech, 12892-1-AP) and incubated overnight at 4°C with gentle shaking. The antigen–antibody immunocomplex was captured by Dynabeads® Protein G (Invitrogen) for 4 h, and then the beads were pulled-down using a Tube Magnetic Stand (Invitrogen). The beads were washed with Co-IP buffer, and captured proteins eluted from the beads using loading buffer was resolved by SDS–PAGE for western blot analysis using a monoclonal TDP-43 antibody (Proteintech, 60019-2-Ig). Co-immunoprecipitation experiments were performed as previously described (14). In brief, HEK293T cells were cotransfected with 2 μg Flag-TDP-43 and 1 μg of vector for GFP-TDP-43, GFP-TDP-431–273, GFP-TDP-4310–414, or GFP-TDP-4376–414 expression. The supernatant containing 300 μg of total protein was incubated with Anti-Flag M2 agarose (Sigma) overnight at 4°C with gentle shaking. Captured proteins eluted from the beads using loading buffer were subjected to western blot analysis.
Primary neuronal culture
The cortex from embryonic day 18 (E18) mouse pups were dissected in HIBERNATE™ A media without calcium (BrainBits), and then incubated in 1 mg/ml papain (Fisher Scientific) at 30°C for 30 min. Tissue was dissociated by triturating with a series of Pasteur pipettes of decreasing diameter. Following centrifugation to collect the cell pellet, the cells were resuspended in Neurobasal A (Invitrogen) supplemented with B27, GMAX, gentamicin and bFGF (Invitrogen). Neurons were seeded at a density of 2 × 104 cells/coverslip in 24-well plates for immunofluorescence studies. At day in vitro 4, 1 × 109 genome rAAV1 virus of GFP, GFP-TDP-43NLSm, GFP-TDP-4310–414-NLSm or GFP-TDP-43R6GV7GT8GE9G-NLSm was added to the cell medium. Five days later, neurons were fixed and immunostained using a mouse monoclonal MAP2 antibody (1:1000, Sigma). All rAAV1 vectors were prepared by standard methods, as previously described (44).
Quantification of neurite outgrowth
Quantification of neurite outgrowth was performed as previously described (44). In brief, images of neurons were captured using a Zeiss LSM 510 META confocal microscope and neurite outgrowth (50 neurons for each treatment) was measured using MetaMorph version 7.1 (Molecular Devices, Downingtown, PA, USA). Data from three separate experiments were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post-hoc analysis (***P < 0.001).
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION
Y.Z., Y.X., J.H., H.S., E.C.W., S.H. and W.C.L. performed experiments. TC performed computer-assisted modeling of TDP-43 monomeric and dimeric structures. Y.Z., T.G., and L.P. performed data analysis. Y.Z., T.G., C.S. and L.P. wrote the manuscript. Y.Z. and L.P. conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
Supplementary Material is available at .
FUNDING
This work was supported by Mayo Clinic Foundation to L.P., National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging (R01AG026251 to L.P.), National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01 NS 063964-01 to L.P., R01 NS077402 to L.P., ES20395-01 to L.P., R21 NS074121-01 to T.F.G., 1R21NS079807-01A1 to Y.Z.), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association to L.P., GHR Foundation to Y.Z, and the Department of Defense (W81XWH-10-1-0512-1 to L.P. and W81XWH-09-1-0315AL093108 to L.P.). Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by Mayo Clinic (Department of Neuroscience).
Authors: Michael A Gitcho; Robert H Baloh; Sumi Chakraverty; Kevin Mayo; Joanne B Norton; Denise Levitch; Kimmo J Hatanpaa; Charles L White; Eileen H Bigio; Richard Caselli; Matt Baker; Muhammad T Al-Lozi; John C Morris; Alan Pestronk; Rosa Rademakers; Alison M Goate; Nigel J Cairns Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2008-02-20 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Yong-Jie Zhang; Ya-Fei Xu; Casey Cook; Tania F Gendron; Paul Roettges; Christopher D Link; Wen-Lang Lin; Jimei Tong; Monica Castanedes-Casey; Peter Ash; Jennifer Gass; Vijayaraghavan Rangachari; Emanuele Buratti; Francisco Baralle; Todd E Golde; Dennis W Dickson; Leonard Petrucelli Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-04-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Edor Kabashi; Paul N Valdmanis; Patrick Dion; Dan Spiegelman; Brendan J McConkey; Christine Vande Velde; Jean-Pierre Bouchard; Lucette Lacomblez; Ksenia Pochigaeva; Francois Salachas; Pierre-Francois Pradat; William Camu; Vincent Meininger; Nicolas Dupre; Guy A Rouleau Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2008-03-30 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Matthew J Winton; Lionel M Igaz; Margaret M Wong; Linda K Kwong; John Q Trojanowski; Virginia M-Y Lee Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2008-02-27 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Lionel M Igaz; Linda K Kwong; Alice Chen-Plotkin; Matthew J Winton; Travis L Unger; Yan Xu; Manuela Neumann; John Q Trojanowski; Virginia M-Y Lee Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2009-01-21 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Nicola J Rutherford; Yong-Jie Zhang; Matt Baker; Jennifer M Gass; Nicole A Finch; Ya-Fei Xu; Heather Stewart; Brendan J Kelley; Karen Kuntz; Richard J P Crook; Jemeen Sreedharan; Caroline Vance; Eric Sorenson; Carol Lippa; Eileen H Bigio; Daniel H Geschwind; David S Knopman; Hiroshi Mitsumoto; Ronald C Petersen; Neil R Cashman; Mike Hutton; Christopher E Shaw; Kevin B Boylan; Bradley Boeve; Neill R Graff-Radford; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Richard J Caselli; Dennis W Dickson; Ian R Mackenzie; Leonard Petrucelli; Rosa Rademakers Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2008-09-19 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Pan-Hsien Kuo; Lyudmila G Doudeva; Yi-Ting Wang; Che-Kun James Shen; Hanna S Yuan Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Miguel Mompeán; Valentina Romano; David Pantoja-Uceda; Cristiana Stuani; Francisco E Baralle; Emanuele Buratti; Douglas V Laurents Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 5.157