Literature DB >> 23574819

Lowest instrumented vertebra selection for Lenke 5C scoliosis: a minimum 2-year radiographical follow-up.

Yu Wang1, Cody Eric Bünger, Yanqun Zhang, Chunsen Wu, Haisheng Li, Benny Dahl, Ebbe Stender Hansen.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A radiographical follow-up and analysis.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the postoperative curve change in Lenke 5C scoliosis, and to discuss how to select lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: 5C curves are relatively rare in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and few studies have focused on this type of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Such questions as "How does the curve change over time in the postoperative period?" "Is LIV selection correlated with final correction and balance?" and "How should we select LIV for Lenke 5C curves?" need to be answered.
METHODS: We reviewed all the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis cases surgically treated in an institution from 2002 through 2008. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with Lenke 5C curves who were treated with selective lumbar fusion; (2) minimum 2-year radiographical follow-up.All image data were available and all measurements were performed in picture archiving and communication systems. Standing posteroanterior and lateral digital radiographs were reviewed at 4 junctures: preoperative, immediate postoperative, 3 months, and 2 years postoperatively.
RESULTS: Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria. The following results were observed: (1) From the perspectives of both Cobb angle and vertebral translation, significant correction was achieved; (2) The correction obtained by surgery was well retained in the postoperative period; (3) Although preoperative spinal imbalance was common in this group of patients, the majority eventually attained balance at 2 years; (4) LIV selection was significantly correlated with the 2-year correction and balance; (5) In the literature as well as in this study, the overall preoperative LIV-center sacral vertical line distance is 28 mm and the overall preoperative LIV tilt is 25°.
CONCLUSION: In Lenke 5C scoliosis, preoperative spinal imbalance is common, although the majority of patients attain balance at 2 years. Significant correction loss is not common in the postoperative period. LIV selection significantly correlates with 2-year correction and balance. A translation of 28 mm and a tilt of 25° may be used as a general criterion for selecting LIV. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23574819     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829537be

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  17 in total

1.  L3 translation predicts when L3 is not distal enough for an "ideal" result in Lenke 5 curves.

Authors:  Lee Phillips; Burt Yaszay; Tracey P Bastrom; Suken A Shah; Baron S Lonner; Firoz Miyanji; Amer F Samdani; Stefan Parent; Jahangir Asghar; Patrick J Cahill; Peter O Newton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Predictive factors for a distal adjacent disorder with L3 as the lowest instrumented vertebra in Lenke 5C patients.

Authors:  Kei Ando; Shiro Imagama; Zenya Ito; Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Tetsuro Hida; Kenyu Ito; Akito Tsushima; Yoshimoto Ishikawa; Akiyuki Matsumoto; Yoshihiro Nishida; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-01

3.  Cobb-1 versus cobb-to-cobb anterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke 5C curves: a radiological comparative study.

Authors:  Arnaud Dubory; Lotfi Miladi; Brice Ilharreborde; Jean-Marie Gennari; Jihane Rouissi; Christophe Glorion; Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette; Thierry Odent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Immediate postoperative coronal imbalance in Lenke 5 and Lenke 6 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Is it predictable?

Authors:  Kai Chen; Jinyi Bai; Yilin Yang; Jie Shao; Mingyuan Yang; Jian Zhao; Changwei Yang; Ming Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Coronal balance in idiopathic scoliosis: a radiological study after posterior fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves (Lenke 5 or 6).

Authors:  Changwei Yang; Yunfei Zhao; Xiao Zhai; Jingfeng Li; Xiaodong Zhu; Ming Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Optimizing the fusion level for lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is the S-line a validated and reproducible tool to predict coronal decompensation?

Authors:  Tianyuan Zhang; Shibin Shu; Wenting Jing; Qi Gu; Zezhang Zhu; Zhen Liu; Yong Qiu; Xu Sun; Bin Wang; Hongda Bao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Criteria for successful correction of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves in AIS patients: results of risk model calculations using target outcomes and failure analysis.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Oliver Meier; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Lowest instrumented vertebrae selection for selective posterior fusion of moderate thoracolumbar/lumbar idiopathic scoliosis: lower-end vertebra or lower-end vertebra+1?

Authors:  Zhijian Sun; Guixing Qiu; Yu Zhao; Yipeng Wang; Jianguo Zhang; Jianxiong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Radiological factors affecting post-operative global coronal balance in Lenke 5 C scoliosis.

Authors:  Ajoy Prasad Shetty; Subramani Suresh; Siddharth N Aiyer; Rishi Kanna; Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

10.  Transient fixation of L4 vertebra preserves lumbar motion and function in Lenke Type 5C and 6C scoliosis.

Authors:  Jae-Ho Yang; Jae-Won Shin; Sub-Ri Park; Sun-Kyu Kim; Sang-Jun Park; Ji-Hwan Min; Byoung-Ho Lee; Kyung-Soo Suk; Jin-Oh Park; Seong-Hwan Moon; Hwan-Mo Lee; Hak-Sun Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.