Literature DB >> 23573781

Sensitivity and specificity: twin goals of proteomics assays. Can they be combined?

Robert Wilson1.   

Abstract

A major ambition of proteomics is the provision of assays that can diagnose disease and monitor therapies. These assays are required to be sensitive and specific for individual proteins, and in most cases to quantify more than one protein in the same sample. The two main technologies currently used for proteomics assays are based on mass spectrometry and panels of affinity molecules such as antibodies. In the first part of this review the most sensitive existing assays based on these technologies are described and compared with the gold standard of ELISA. Analytical sensitivity is defined and related to the limit of detection, and analytical specificity is defined and shown to depend on molecular proofreading steps, similar to those applied in living systems whenever there is a need for high fidelity. It is shown that at present neither mass spectrometry nor panels of affinity molecules offer the necessary combination of sensitivity and specificity required for multiplexed assays. In the second part of this review the growing numbers of assays that use additional proofreading steps to combine sensitivity with specificity are described. These include assays based on proximity ligation and slow off-rate modified aptamers. Finally the review considers what improvements might be possible in the near future, and concludes that further development of proteomics assays incorporating advanced proofreading steps are most likely to provide the necessary combination of sensitivity and specificity, without incurring high development costs.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23573781     DOI: 10.1586/epr.13.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics        ISSN: 1478-9450            Impact factor:   3.940


  15 in total

1.  Transcription Factor Based Small-Molecule Sensing with a Rapid Cell Phone Enabled Fluorescent Bead Assay.

Authors:  Margaret Chern; Padric M Garden; R C Baer; James E Galagan; Allison M Dennis
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Focal molography is a new method for the in situ analysis of molecular interactions in biological samples.

Authors:  Volker Gatterdam; Andreas Frutiger; Klaus-Peter Stengele; Dieter Heindl; Thomas Lübbers; Janos Vörös; Christof Fattinger
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  Plasma proteomic analysis to identify potential biomarkers of histologic chorioamnionitis in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes.

Authors:  Ji Eun Lee; Kisoon Dan; Hyeon Ji Kim; Yu Mi Kim; Kyo Hoon Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Chemical genomics for studying parasite gene function and interaction.

Authors:  Jian Li; Jing Yuan; Ken Chih-Chien Cheng; James Inglese; Xin-zhuan Su
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2013-11-09

5.  Cervicovaginal fluid proteomic analysis to identify potential biomarkers for preterm birth.

Authors:  Samuel Parry; Rita Leite; M Sean Esplin; Radek Bukowski; Heping Zhang; Michael Varner; William W Andrews; George R Saade; John Ilekis; Uma M Reddy; Hao Huang; Yoel Sadovsky; Ian A Blair; Joseph Biggio
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Application of catalyst-free click reactions in attaching affinity molecules to tips of atomic force microscopy for detection of protein biomarkers.

Authors:  Subhadip Senapati; Saikat Manna; Stuart Lindsay; Peiming Zhang
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.882

Review 7.  Solid-phase extraction strategies to surmount body fluid sample complexity in high-throughput mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

Authors:  Marco R Bladergroen; Yuri E M van der Burgt
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 8.  Proteomic challenges: sample preparation techniques for microgram-quantity protein analysis from biological samples.

Authors:  Peter Feist; Amanda B Hummon
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Highly sensitive detection and quantification of the secreted bacterial benevolence factor RoxP using a capacitive biosensor: A possible early detection system for oxidative skin diseases.

Authors:  Gizem Ertürk; Martin Hedström; Bo Mattiasson; Tautgirdas Ruzgas; Rolf Lood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Cancer diagnostics based on plasma protein biomarkers: hard times but great expectations.

Authors:  Ulf Landegren; Maria Hammond
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 6.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.