Literature DB >> 23571611

The relationship between proximal and distal colonic adenomas: is screening sigmoidoscopy enough in the presence of a changing epidemiology?

Alfredo J Lucendo1, Danila Guagnozzi, Teresa Angueira, Sonia González-Castillo, Mariluz Fernández-Fuente, Ana B Friginal-Ruiz, Jose M Tenias.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Because the relationship between distal and proximal colonic findings remains uncertain, controversy exists over whether proctosigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy is more suitable for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We aim to describe the distribution and characteristics of polyps removed in colonoscopy screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective registry of a colonoscopy-based CRC screening program was developed on asymptomatic individuals over 50 years. All polyps were removed and characterized. Polyp size and histology were noted. Adenomas were considered advanced if they measured greater than 10 mm or were tubulovillous, villous, or malignant. The prevalence of advanced proximal polyps was determined and patients were categorized according to their family history of CRC.
RESULTS: A total of 696 individuals (418 women), aged 57.7 ± 10.3 years, were examined; 45.8% presented a colonic lesion, being adenomatous polyps in 32.7% individuals. Among these, 24.7% were advanced adenomas. Three patients (0.6%) presented invasive CRC. There were no significant differences with respect to sex and family history of CRC between patients with or without adenomas. Adenomas were more prevalent in individuals aged at least 65, irrespective of location (P<0.001). In 65.1% of individuals with adenomatous polyps in the right colon, there were no synchronous adenomas in the left colon (P<0.001). More adenomas were also present in the right colon of patients with no family history of CRC (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Most patients with adenomatous polyps in the right colon showed no synchronic adenomas on the left side. Lesions on the right side would have gone undetected if the individuals undergoing CRC screening had been explored with proctosigmoidoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23571611     DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283614b57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Association between Distal Findings and Proximal Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jason L W Huang; Y H Wang; Johnny Y Jiang; C P Yu; Y L Wu; P Chen; X Q Yuan; Harry H X Wang; Martin C S Wong
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Clinical and endoscopic-pathological characteristics of colorectal polyps: an analysis of 1,234 cases.

Authors:  Xiaohua Long; Xiaofeng Li; Lin Ma; Jing Lu; Suhuan Liao; Ruohu Gui
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

3.  Histopathological and epidemiological findings of colonoscopy screening in a population with an average risk of colorectal cancer in Kuwait.

Authors:  Hassan B Abdelnaby; Ali A Abuhussein; Ahmed M Fouad; Wafaa A Alhashash; Abdulrahman S Aldousari; Ahmed M Abdelaleem; Marcus Edelhamre; Maha H Shahin; Mohammed Faisal
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.485

4.  An algorithm to predict advanced proximal colorectal neoplasia in Chinese asymptomatic population.

Authors:  Jason Liwen Huang; Ping Chen; Xiaoqin Yuan; Yunlin Wu; Harry Haoxiang Wang; Martin Chisang Wong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Polyp detection rate and pathological features in patients undergoing a comprehensive colonoscopy screening.

Authors:  Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei; Ehsan Nazemalhosseini Mojarad; Sara Ashtari; Mohmad Amin Pourhoseingholi; Vahid Chaleshi; Fakhrosadat Anaraki; Mehrdad Haghazali; Mohammad Reza Zali
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2017-02-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.