Literature DB >> 23571322

Physiological and behavioral responses of poultry exposed to gas-filled high expansion foam.

D E F McKeegan1, H G M Reimert, V A Hindle, P Boulcott, J M Sparrey, C M Wathes, T G M Demmers, M A Gerritzen.   

Abstract

Disease control measures require poultry to be killed on farms to minimize the risk of disease being transmitted to other poultry and, in some cases, to protect public health. We assessed the welfare implications for poultry of the use of high-expansion gas-filled foam as a potentially humane, emergency killing method. In laboratory trials, broiler chickens, adult laying hens, ducks, and turkeys were exposed to air-, N2-, or CO2-filled high expansion foam (expansion ratio 300:1) under standardized conditions. Birds were equipped with sensors to measure cardiac and brain activity, and measurements of oxygen concentration in the foam were carried out. Initial behavioral responses to foam were not pronounced but included headshakes and brief bouts of wing flapping. Both N2- and CO2-filled foam rapidly induced ataxia/loss of posture and vigorous wing flapping in all species, characteristic of anoxic death. Immersion in air-filled, high expansion foam had little effect on physiology or behavior. Physiological responses to both N2- and CO2-filled foam were characterized by a pronounced bradyarrythymia and a series of consistent changes in the appearance of the electroencephalogram. These were used to determine an unequivocal time to loss of consciousness in relation to submersion. Mean time to loss of consciousness was 30 s in hens and 18 s in broilers exposed to N2-filled foam, and 16 s in broilers, 1 s in ducks, and 15 s in turkeys exposed to CO2-filled foam. Euthanasia achieved with anoxic foam was particularly rapid, which is explained by the very low oxygen concentrations (below 1%) inside the foam. Physiological observations and postmortem examination showed that the mode of action of high expansion, gas-filled foam is anoxia, not occlusion of the airway. These trials provide proof-of-principle that submersion in gas-filled, high expansion foam provides a rapid and highly effective method of euthanasia, which may have potential to provide humane emergency killing or routine depopulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23571322     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2012-02587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  14 in total

1.  Effects of ambient temperature and water vapor on chamber pressure and oxygen level during low atmospheric pressure stunning of poultry.

Authors:  Paul H Holloway; David G Pritchard
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Time to Loss of Consciousness and Its Relation to Behavior in Slaughter Pigs during Stunning with 80 or 95% Carbon Dioxide.

Authors:  Merel Verhoeven; Marien Gerritzen; Antonio Velarde; Ludo Hellebrekers; Bas Kemp
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-05-19

3.  Cerebral and brainstem electrophysiologic activity during euthanasia with pentobarbital sodium in horses.

Authors:  M Aleman; D C Williams; A Guedes; J E Madigan
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Depopulation of Caged Layer Hens with a Compressed Air Foam System.

Authors:  Shailesh Gurung; John Hoffman; Kendre Stringfellow; Daad Abi-Ghanem; Dan Zhao; David Caldwell; Jason Lee; Darrel Styles; Luc Berghman; James Byrd; Yuhua Farnell; Gregory Archer; Morgan Farnell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Carbon Dioxide and Nitrogen Infused Compressed Air Foam for Depopulation of Caged Laying Hens.

Authors:  Shailesh Gurung; Dima White; Gregory Archer; Darrel Styles; Dan Zhao; Yuhua Farnell; James Byrd; Morgan Farnell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  On Farm Evaluation of a Novel Mechanical Cervical Dislocation Device for Poultry.

Authors:  Jessica E Martin; Victoria Sandilands; Julian Sparrey; Laurence Baker; Dorothy E F McKeegan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Welfare assessment of novel on-farm killing methods for poultry.

Authors:  Jessica E Martin; Victoria Sandilands; Julian Sparrey; Laurence Baker; Laura M Dixon; Dorothy E F McKeegan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Is a "Good Death" at the Time of Animal Slaughter an Essentially Contested Concept?

Authors:  Qurat ulAin; Terry L Whiting
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Welfare Risks of Repeated Application of On-Farm Killing Methods for Poultry.

Authors:  Jessica E Martin; Dale A Sandercock; Victoria Sandilands; Julian Sparrey; Laurence Baker; Nick H C Sparks; Dorothy E F McKeegan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Evaluation of Two Compressed Air Foam Systems for Culling Caged Layer Hens.

Authors:  Eric R Benson; Jaclyn A Weiher; Robert L Alphin; Morgan Farnell; Daniel P Hougentogler
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.