Literature DB >> 23571175

Effectiveness of vaccination with the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine in Nicaragua as determined using the screening method.

Anna Cardellino1, Shazia Khawaja, Edmundo Sánchez Cruz, T Christopher Mast.   

Abstract

The screening method is a surveillance tool to evaluate vaccine effectiveness (VE) using coverage data on cases and available administrative estimates of vaccine coverage in the population. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the utility and limitations of using the screening methodology to estimate VE, particularly in a developing world country with a high coverage rate, and to compare it with the VE estimates from 2 case-control studies. Using data from 2008, the screening method employed in this study estimated that VE for 3 doses of RV5 among children<12 mo of age to prevent wild-type severe disease, resulting in hospitalization or emergency department visits, was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78-100%). Additional sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the point estimates of VE against severe disease ranged from 72% (95% CI: 62-83%) to 92% (95% CI: 78-100%); this range of VE estimates, although wide, is relatively consistent with results reported from 2 case-control studies in Nicaragua for the same time period. When the infrastructure is in place to collect reasonably robust case data, the use of the screening method to estimate VE is possible in the developing world setting. Cases of severe wild-type rotavirus gastroenteritis were obtained through an observational, hospital-based, prospective, surveillance program to assess rotavirus acute gastroenteritis. The proportion of cases vaccinated was estimated using the child's vaccination card or health record. The proportion of the population vaccinated was estimated using administrative population-based vaccination coverage estimates provided by the Nicaraguan Ministry of Health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RV5; pentavalent rotavirus vaccine; rotavirus; screening method; vaccine effectiveness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23571175     DOI: 10.4161/hv.24338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother        ISSN: 2164-5515            Impact factor:   3.452


  5 in total

Review 1.  Rotavirus vaccines: current status and future considerations.

Authors:  Catherine Yen; Jacqueline E Tate; Terri B Hyde; Margaret M Cortese; Benjamin A Lopman; Baoming Jiang; Roger I Glass; Umesh D Parashar
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Association between mixed rotavirus vaccination types of infants and rotavirus acute gastroenteritis.

Authors:  Anaam Mohammed; Lilly Immergluck; Trisha Chan Parker; Shabnam Jain; Traci Leong; Evan J Anderson; Robert C Jerris
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Field seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness: evaluation of the screening method using different sources of data during the 2010/2011 French influenza season.

Authors:  Alessandra Falchi; Cecile Souty; Marie-Lise Grisoni; Anne Mosnier; Thomas Hanslik; Isabelle Daviaud; Laurent Varesi; Solen Kerneis; Fabrice Carrat; Thierry Blanchon
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Estimating rotavirus vaccine effectiveness in Japan using a screening method.

Authors:  Kaoru Araki; Megumi Hara; Yuta Sakanishi; Chisato Shimanoe; Yuichiro Nishida; Muneaki Matsuo; Keitaro Tanaka
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Efficacy, safety and effectiveness of licensed rotavirus vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis for Latin America and the Caribbean.

Authors:  Raúl F Velázquez; Alexandre C Linhares; Sergio Muñoz; Pamela Seron; Pedro Lorca; Rodrigo DeAntonio; Eduardo Ortega-Barria
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.125

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.