Literature DB >> 23571068

DNA repair activity in fish and interest in ecotoxicology: a review.

Aude Kienzler1, Sylvie Bony, Alain Devaux.   

Abstract

The knowledge of DNA repair in a target species is of first importance as it is the primary line of defense against genotoxicants, and a better knowledge of DNA repair capacity in fish could help to interpret genotoxicity data and/or assist in the choice of target species, developmental stage and tissues to focus on, both for environmental biomonitoring studies and DNA repair testing. This review focuses in a first part on what is presently known on a mechanistic basis, about the various DNA repair systems in fish, in vivo and in established cell lines. Data on base excision repair (BER), direct reversal with O⁶-alkylguanine transferase and double strand breaks repair, although rather scarce, are being reviewed, as well as nucleotide excision repair (NER) and photoreactivation repair (PER), which are by far the most studied repair mechanisms in fish. Most of these repair mechanisms seem to be strongly species and tissue dependent; they also depend on the developmental stage of the organisms. BER is efficient in vivo, although no data has been found on in vitro models. NER activity is quite low or even inexistent depending on the studies; however this lack is partly compensated by a strong PER activity, especially in early developmental stage. In a second part, a survey of the ecotoxicological studies integrating DNA repair as a parameter responding to single or mixture of contaminant is realized. Three main approaches are being used: the measurement of DNA repair gene expression after exposure, although it has not yet been clearly established whether gene expression is indicative of repair capacity; the monitoring of DNA damage removal by following DNA repair kinetics; and the modulation of DNA repair activity following exposure in situ, in order to assess the impact of exposure history on DNA repair capacity. Since all DNA repair processes are possible targets for environmental pollutants, we can also wonder at which extent such a modulation of repair capacities in fish could be the base for the development of new biomarkers of genotoxicity. Knowing the importance of the germ cell DNA integrity in the reproductive success of aquatic organisms, the DNA repair capacity of such cells deserve to be more studied, as well as DNA repair capacities of established fish cell lines. The limited amount of available data, which shows low/slow DNA repair capacities of fish cell lines compared with mammalian cell lines, concerned mainly the NER system; thus this point merits to be explored more deeply. Additionally, since some of the DNA repair systems appear more efficient in embryo larval stages, it would be of interest to consider embryonic cell lineages more closely.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23571068     DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2013.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aquat Toxicol        ISSN: 0166-445X            Impact factor:   4.964


  13 in total

1.  Photo-enzymatic repair of UVB-induced DNA damage in the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae.

Authors:  Yasumasa Murata; Masahiro Osakabe
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Genotoxic potential of selected cytostatic drugs in human and zebrafish cells.

Authors:  Goran Gajski; Marko Gerić; Bojana Žegura; Matjaž Novak; Jana Nunić; Džejla Bajrektarević; Vera Garaj-Vrhovac; Metka Filipič
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Estimating the DNA strand breakage using a fuzzy inference system and agarose gel electrophoresis, a case study with toothed carp Aphanius sophiae exposed to cypermethrin.

Authors:  Hadi Poorbagher; Maryam Nasrollahpour Moghaddam; Soheil Eagderi; Hamid Farahmand
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Embryo/larval toxicity and transcriptional effects in zebrafish (Danio rerio) exposed to endocrine active riverbed sediments.

Authors:  Luigi Viganò; Nadia Casatta; Anna Farkas; Giuseppe Mascolo; Claudio Roscioli; Fabrizio Stefani; Matteo Vitelli; Fabio Olivo; Laura Clerici; Pasquale Robles; Pierluisa Dellavedova
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Health Status of Sand Flathead (Platycephalus bassensis), Inhabiting an Industrialised and Urbanised Embayment, Port Phillip Bay, Victoria as Measured by Biomarkers of Exposure and Effects.

Authors:  Jarrad K Baker; Sara M Long; Kathryn L Hassell; Vincent J Pettigrove; Marthe M Gagnon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Alterations in Synthesis and Repair of DNA during the Development of Loach Misgurnus fossilis.

Authors:  Leonid V Gening; Andrei V Lakhin; Irina V Makarova; Valentina V Nenasheva; Ludmila E Andreeva; Vyacheslav Z Tarantul
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2016-01-27

Review 7.  Stage-Specific Effects of Ionizing Radiation during Early Development.

Authors:  Yasuko Honjo; Tatsuo Ichinohe
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Mesotrione herbicide promotes biochemical changes and DNA damage in two fish species.

Authors:  L D S Piancini; I C Guiloski; H C Silva de Assis; M M Cestari
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2015-08-22

9.  Co-exposure to environmental carcinogens in vivo induces neoplasia-related hallmarks in low-genotoxicity events, even after removal of insult.

Authors:  Marta Martins; Ana Silva; Maria H Costa; Célia Miguel; Pedro M Costa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Co-exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles (NpTiO2) and lead at environmentally relevant concentrations in the Neotropical fish species Hoplias intermedius.

Authors:  Taynah Vicari; Ana Carolina Dagostim; Tatiane Klingelfus; Gabrieli Limberger Galvan; Patrícia Sampaio Monteiro; Letícia da Silva Pereira; Helena Cristina Silva de Assis; Marta Margarete Cestari
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2018-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.