Literature DB >> 23571005

Prospective evaluation of a molecular marker panel for prediction of recurrence and cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy.

Yair Lotan1, Aditya Bagrodia, Niccolo Passoni, Varun Rachakonda, Payal Kapur, Yull Arriaga, Christian Bolenz, Vitaly Margulis, Ganesh V Raj, Arthur I Sagalowsky, Shahrokh F Shariat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies demonstrated that cell cycle-related and proliferation biomarkers add information to standard pathologic tumor features after radical cystectomy (RC). There are no prospective studies validating the clinical utility of markers in bladder cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively determine whether a panel of biomarkers could identify patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) who were likely to experience disease recurrence or mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between January 2007 and January 2012, every patient with high-grade bladder cancer, including 216 patients treated with RC and lymphadenectomy, underwent immunohistochemical staining for tumor protein p53 (Tp53); cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (p21, Cip1) (CDKN1A); cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B (p27, Kip1); antigen identified by monoclonal antibody Ki-67 (MKI67); and cyclin E1. INTERVENTION: Every patient underwent RC and lymphadenectomy, and marker staining. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Cox regression analyses tested the ability of the number of altered biomarkers to predict recurrence or cancer-specific mortality (CSM). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Pathologic stage among the study population was pT0 (5%), pT1 (35%), pT2 (19%), pT3 (29%), and pT4 (13%); lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was seen in 34%. The median number of removed lymph nodes was 23, and 60 patients had lymph node involvement (LNI). Median follow-up was 20 mo. Expression of p53, p21, p27, cyclin E1, and Ki-67 were altered in 54%, 26%, 46%, 15%, and 75% patients, respectively. In univariable analyses, pT stage, LNI, LVI, perioperative chemotherapy (CTx), margin status, and number of altered biomarkers predicted disease recurrence. In a multivariable model adjusting for pathologic stage, margins, LNI, and adjuvant CTx, only LVI and number of altered biomarkers were independent predictors of recurrence and CSM. The concordance index of a baseline model predicting CSM (including pathologic stage, margins, LVI, LNI, and adjuvant CTx) was 80% and improved to 83% with addition of the number of altered markers.
CONCLUSIONS: Molecular markers improve the prediction of recurrence and CSM after RC. They may identify patients who might benefit from additional treatments and closer surveillance after cystectomy.
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Cystectomy; Molecular markers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23571005     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  26 in total

1.  From genomics to imaging-advances along the care continuum.

Authors:  Ahmed Haddad; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Increasing utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Kirk A Keegan; Harras B Zaid; Sanjay G Patel; Sam S Chang
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  GPX2 underexpression indicates poor prognosis in patients with urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract and urinary bladder.

Authors:  I-Wei Chang; Victor Chia-Hsiang Lin; Chih-Hsin Hung; Hua-Pin Wang; Yung-Yao Lin; Wen-Jeng Wu; Chun-Nung Huang; Ching-Chia Li; Wei-Ming Li; Jui-Yu Wu; Chien-Feng Li
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Bladder cancer: biomarker panel predicts recurrence after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Sarah Payton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Molecular profile of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: are pelvicalyceal and ureteral tumors different?

Authors:  Laura-Maria Krabbe; Aditya Bagrodia; Mary E Westerman; Bishoy A Gayed; Ahmed Q Haddad; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Shahrokh F Shariat; Payal Kapur; Yair Lotan; Vitaly Margulis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Cell Cycle Markers in the Evaluation of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Jéssica Niederauer Leote da Silva; Alana Durayski Ranzi; Caroline Trainotti Carvalho; Tales Vicente Scheide; Yuri Thomé Machado Strey; Túlio Meyer Graziottin; Claudia Giuliano Bica
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.201

7.  SPAG5 promotes proliferation and suppresses apoptosis in bladder urothelial carcinoma by upregulating Wnt3 via activating the AKT/mTOR pathway and predicts poorer survival.

Authors:  J Y Liu; Q H Zeng; P G Cao; D Xie; F Yang; L Y He; Y B Dai; J J Li; X M Liu; H L Zeng; X J Fan; L Liu; Y X Zhu; L Gong; Y Cheng; J D Zhou; J Hu; H Bo; Z Z Xu; K Cao
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of p21 (Cip1/Waf1) expression in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Kun Tang; Chenghe Wang; Zhong Chen; Hua Xu; Zhangqun Ye
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-05-01

9.  Prostate tumor overexpressed 1 expression in invasive urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Steffen Rausch; Jörg Hennenlotter; Marcus Scharpf; Katharina Teepe; Ursula Kühs; Stefan Aufderklamm; Simone Bier; Johannes Mischinger; Georgios Gakis; Arnulf Stenzl; Christian Schwentner; Tilman Todenhöfer
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Genomic Biomarkers for the Prediction of Stage and Prognosis of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Aditya Bagrodia; Eugene K Cha; John P Sfakianos; Emily C Zabor; Bernard H Bochner; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; David B Solit; Jonathan A Coleman; Gopa Iyer; Sasinya N Scott; Ronak Shah; Irina Ostrovnaya; Byron Lee; Neil B Desai; Qinghu Ren; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Guido Dalbagni; Dean F Bajorin; Victor E Reuter; Michael F Berger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.