Betina Yanez1, Sofia F Garcia, David Victorson, John M Salsman. 1. Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N. Lake Shore Drive, 10th floor, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. betina.yanez@northwestern.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Being diagnosed with cancer as a young adult can lead to significant psychological distress and impaired quality of life. Compared to children and older adults diagnosed with cancer, fewer studies have addressed psychological distress among young adult cancer survivors. This study sought to identify the prevalence of, and factors associated with, distress among young adult cancer survivors (ages 18-39). METHODS: Young adult cancer survivors (N = 335, mean age = 31.8, women = 68.4%) were recruited from an online research panel and stratified by cohort (time postactive treatment: 0-12, 13-24, and 25-60 months). Participants completed measures assessing demographic and clinical characteristics, global impact of cancer, cancer-related education and work interruption, and cancer-specific distress using the impact of event scale (IES). RESULTS: The mean score on the IES (M = 31.0, range = 0-75) was above the cut point of 20, suggesting clinically elevated distress. Analysis of covariance revealed significant main effects for cohort, global impact and cancer-related education/work interruption, and an interaction between cohort and cancer-related education/work interruption on distress. Although there was no significant effect of education/work interruption on distress for those in the 0-12 month cohort (p = .88), survivors in the 13-24 and 25-60 month cohorts reporting education/work interruption were significantly more distressed than those not reporting education/work interruption in the respective cohorts (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Young adult cancer survivors face unique challenges. These data underscore the importance of attending to cancer-related distress beyond the completion of treatment and may help inform targeted interventions to prevent or reduce significant distress and related sequelae in this population.
PURPOSE: Being diagnosed with cancer as a young adult can lead to significant psychological distress and impaired quality of life. Compared to children and older adults diagnosed with cancer, fewer studies have addressed psychological distress among young adult cancer survivors. This study sought to identify the prevalence of, and factors associated with, distress among young adult cancer survivors (ages 18-39). METHODS: Young adult cancer survivors (N = 335, mean age = 31.8, women = 68.4%) were recruited from an online research panel and stratified by cohort (time postactive treatment: 0-12, 13-24, and 25-60 months). Participants completed measures assessing demographic and clinical characteristics, global impact of cancer, cancer-related education and work interruption, and cancer-specific distress using the impact of event scale (IES). RESULTS: The mean score on the IES (M = 31.0, range = 0-75) was above the cut point of 20, suggesting clinically elevated distress. Analysis of covariance revealed significant main effects for cohort, global impact and cancer-related education/work interruption, and an interaction between cohort and cancer-related education/work interruption on distress. Although there was no significant effect of education/work interruption on distress for those in the 0-12 month cohort (p = .88), survivors in the 13-24 and 25-60 month cohorts reporting education/work interruption were significantly more distressed than those not reporting education/work interruption in the respective cohorts (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Young adult cancer survivors face unique challenges. These data underscore the importance of attending to cancer-related distress beyond the completion of treatment and may help inform targeted interventions to prevent or reduce significant distress and related sequelae in this population.
Authors: Anne E Kazak; Branlyn Werba Derosa; Lisa A Schwartz; Wendy Hobbie; Claire Carlson; Richard F Ittenbach; Jun J Mao; Jill P Ginsberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Keith M Bellizzi; Ashley Smith; Steven Schmidt; Theresa H M Keegan; Brad Zebrack; Charles F Lynch; Dennis Deapen; Margarett Shnorhavorian; Bradley J Tompkins; Michael Simon Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-03-13 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jessica R Gorman; Vanessa L Malcarne; Scott C Roesch; Lisa Madlensky; John P Pierce Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-02-04 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Linda C Harlan; Charles F Lynch; Theresa H M Keegan; Ann S Hamilton; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Ikuko Kato; Michele M West; Rosemary D Cress; Stephen M Schwartz; Ashley W Smith; Dennis Deapen; Sonja M Stringer; Arnold L Potosky Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Marie Barnett; Glynnis McDonnell; Antonio DeRosa; Tammy Schuler; Errol Philip; Lisa Peterson; Kaitlin Touza; Sabrina Jhanwar; Thomas M Atkinson; Jennifer S Ford Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Dale J Langford; Bruce Cooper; Steven Paul; Janice Humphreys; Carolyn Keagy; Yvette P Conley; Marilyn J Hammer; Jon D Levine; Fay Wright; Michelle Melisko; Christine Miaskowski; Laura B Dunn Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2017-08-21 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: David Victorson; Sofia F Garcia; Stacy Sanford; Mallory A Snyder; Sara Lampert; John M Salsman Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Anne C Kirchhoff; Holly L Spraker-Perlman; Molly McFadden; Echo L Warner; Kevin C Oeffinger; Jennifer Wright; Anita Y Kinney Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2014-06-01 Impact factor: 2.223