Literature DB >> 23568333

Review of the cost effectiveness of pharmacogenetic-guided treatment of hypercholesterolaemia.

Michael J Sorich1, Michael D Wiese, Rebekah L O'Shea, Brita Pekarsky.   

Abstract

Hypercholesterolaemia is a highly prevalent condition that has major health and cost implications for society. Pharmacotherapy is an important and effective treatment modality for hypercholesterolaemia, with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors ('statins') the most commonly used class of drugs. Over the past decade, there has been intensive research to identify pharmacogenetic markers to guide treatment of hypercholesterolaemia. This study aimed to review the evidence of incremental cost, effect and cost effectiveness of pharmacogenetic-guided treatment of hypercholesterolaemia. Three cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) were identified that studied the value of screening for genotypes of angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE), cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP), and kinesin family member 6 (KIF6) prior to initiating statin therapy. For all three CEAs, a major limitation identified was the reproducibility of the evidence supporting the clinical effect of screening for the pharmacogenetic marker. Associated issues included the uncertain value of pharmacogenetic markers over or in addition to existing approaches for monitoring lipid levels, and the lack of evidence to assess the effectiveness of alternative therapeutic options for individuals identified as poor responders to statin therapy. Finally, the economic context of the market for diagnostic tests (is it competitive or is there market power?) and the practicality of large-scale screening programmes to inform prescribing in a complex and varied market may limit the generalizability of the results of the specific CEAs to policy outcomes. The genotype of solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1 (SLCO1B1) has recently been associated with increased risk of muscle toxicity with statin therapy and the review identified that exploration of cost effectiveness of this pharmacogenetic marker is likely warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23568333     DOI: 10.1007/s40273-013-0045-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  80 in total

1.  Statins promote potent systemic antioxidant effects through specific inflammatory pathways.

Authors:  Mehdi H Shishehbor; Marie-Luise Brennan; Ronnier J Aviles; Xiaoming Fu; Marc S Penn; Dennis L Sprecher; Stanley L Hazen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-07-14       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors is modified by the ACE insertion deletion polymorphism.

Authors:  Anke-Hilse Maitland-van der Zee; Olaf H Klungel; Hubertus G M Leufkens; Anthonius de Boer; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Albert Hofman; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Cornelia M van Duijn; John J P Kastelein
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.162

3.  Genetic involvement in statins induced myopathy. Preliminary data from an observational case-control study.

Authors:  Luca Puccetti; Federica Ciani; Alberto Auteri
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 5.162

4.  Interactions between angiotensin-I converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism and response of plasma lipids and coronary atherosclerosis to treatment with fluvastatin: the lipoprotein and coronary atherosclerosis study.

Authors:  A J Marian; F Safavi; L Ferlic; J K Dunn; A M Gotto; C M Ballantyne
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Differential effect of the rs4149056 variant in SLCO1B1 on myopathy associated with simvastatin and atorvastatin.

Authors:  L R Brunham; P J Lansberg; L Zhang; F Miao; C Carter; G K Hovingh; H Visscher; J W Jukema; A F Stalenhoef; C J D Ross; B C Carleton; J J P Kastelein; M R Hayden
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.550

6.  Use of genotype frequencies in medicated groups to investigate prescribing practice: APOE and statins as a proof of principle.

Authors:  Neil M Davies; Frank Windmeijer; Richard M Martin; Mohammad R Abdollahi; George Davey Smith; Debbie A Lawlor; Shah Ebrahim; Ian N M Day
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  No impact of KIF6 genotype on vascular risk and statin response among 18,348 randomized patients in the heart protection study.

Authors:  Jemma C Hopewell; Sarah Parish; Robert Clarke; Jane Armitage; Louise Bowman; Jorg Hager; Mark Lathrop; Rory Collins
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  The SLCO1B1*5 genetic variant is associated with statin-induced side effects.

Authors:  Deepak Voora; Svati H Shah; Ivan Spasojevic; Shazia Ali; Carol R Reed; Benjamin A Salisbury; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  The cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) TaqIB polymorphism in the cholesterol and recurrent events study: no interaction with the response to pravastatin therapy and no effects on cardiovascular outcome: a prospective analysis of the CETP TaqIB polymorphism on cardiovascular outcome and interaction with cholesterol-lowering therapy.

Authors:  Greetje J de Grooth; Kim E Zerba; Shu-Pang Huang; Zenta Tsuchihashi; Todd Kirchgessner; René Belder; Priya Vishnupad; Beihong Hu; Anke H E M Klerkx; Aeilko H Zwinderman; J Wouter Jukema; Frank M Sacks; John J P Kastelein; Jan Albert Kuivenhoven
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Apolipoprotein E mRNA expression in mononuclear cells from normolipidemic and hypercholesterolemic individuals treated with atorvastatin.

Authors:  Alvaro Cerda; Fabiana D V Genvigir; Maria A V Willrich; Simone S Arazi; Marcia M S Bernik; Egidio L Dorea; Marcelo C Bertolami; Andre A Faludi; Mario H Hirata; Rosario D C Hirata
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.876

View more
  9 in total

1.  Pharmacogenomic substudies of randomized controlled trials: consideration of safety outcomes.

Authors:  Michael J Sorich; Andrew Rowland; Michael D Wiese
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2014-04

2.  Pilot study of pharmacist-assisted delivery of pharmacogenetic testing in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Nancy M Allen LaPointe; Alex Cho; Shelby D Reed; Rachel Mills; Jivan Moaddeb; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 3.  Pharmacogenomics of statins: lipid response and other outcomes in Brazilian cohorts.

Authors:  Carolina Dagli-Hernandez; Yitian Zhou; Volker Martin Lauschke; Fabiana Dalla Vecchia Genvigir; Thiago Dominguez Crespo Hirata; Mario Hiroyuki Hirata; Rosario Dominguez Crespo Hirata
Journal:  Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.024

Review 4.  A pediatric perspective on genomics and prevention in the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Bimal P Chaudhari; Kandamurugu Manickam; Kim L McBride
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 5.  Is individualized medicine more cost-effective? A systematic review.

Authors:  Maximilian H M Hatz; Katharina Schremser; Wolf H Rogowski
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Indirect estimation of the comparative treatment effect in pharmacogenomic subgroups.

Authors:  Michael J Sorich; Michael Coory; Brita A K Pekarsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Review of the Reported Measures of Clinical Validity and Clinical Utility as Arguments for the Implementation of Pharmacogenetic Testing: A Case Study of Statin-Induced Muscle Toxicity.

Authors:  Marleen E Jansen; T Rigter; W Rodenburg; T M C Fleur; E J F Houwink; M Weda; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 8.  Pharmacogenomic and pharmacogenetic-guided therapy as a tool in precision medicine: current state and factors impacting acceptance by stakeholders.

Authors:  Gregory P Hess; Eileen Fonseca; Rachel Scott; Jesen Fagerness
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Concepts of 'personalization' in personalized medicine: implications for economic evaluation.

Authors:  Wolf Rogowski; Katherine Payne; Petra Schnell-Inderst; Andrea Manca; Ursula Rochau; Beate Jahn; Oguzhan Alagoz; Reiner Leidl; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.981

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.