Corinna Vossius1, Arvid Rongve2, Ingelin Testad3, Anders Wimo4, Dag Aarsland5. 1. Department of Neurology, Stavanger University Hospital, Norway; Centre for Age-related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Norway; Stavanger Teaching Nursing Home, Stavanger, Norway. Electronic address: c.vossius@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Haugesund Hospital, Norway. 3. Centre for Age-related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Norway. 4. Department of Neurobiology Caring Science and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 5. Centre for Age-related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Neurobiology Caring Science and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of formal care during the first three years after diagnosis of mild dementia and identify cost-predicting factors. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study over three years. SETTING: An incidence-based bottom-up cost-of-illness study where information about formal health care services was drawn from the municipalities' registers during the first three years after the diagnosis of mild dementia. PARTICIPANTS: 109 patients with mild dementia at baseline, diagnosed according to consensus criteria based on standardized assessments. MEASUREMENT: The use of formal care as registered by the municipalities' registration systems. Costs were estimated by applying unit costs, including municipal expenses and out-of-pocket contributions. Clinical data were collected at baseline to identify cost-predicting factors. RESULTS: Costs for formal care were increasing from € 535 per month of survival (MOS) at baseline to € 3,611 per MOS during the third year, with a mean of € 2,420 during the whole observation period. The major cost driver (74%) was institutional care. The costs for people with dementia with Lewy bodies (€ 3,247 per MOS) were significantly higher than for people with Alzheimer disease (€ 1,855 per MOS). The most important cost-predicting factors we identified were the living situation, a diagnosis of non-Alzheimer disease, comorbidity, and daily living functioning. The use of cholinesterase inhibitors was related to lower costs. CONCLUSION: Formal care costs increased significantly over time with institutional care being the heaviest cost driver. Studies with longer observation periods will be necessary to evaluate the complete socioeconomic impact of the course of dementia.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of formal care during the first three years after diagnosis of mild dementia and identify cost-predicting factors. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study over three years. SETTING: An incidence-based bottom-up cost-of-illness study where information about formal health care services was drawn from the municipalities' registers during the first three years after the diagnosis of mild dementia. PARTICIPANTS: 109 patients with mild dementia at baseline, diagnosed according to consensus criteria based on standardized assessments. MEASUREMENT: The use of formal care as registered by the municipalities' registration systems. Costs were estimated by applying unit costs, including municipal expenses and out-of-pocket contributions. Clinical data were collected at baseline to identify cost-predicting factors. RESULTS: Costs for formal care were increasing from € 535 per month of survival (MOS) at baseline to € 3,611 per MOS during the third year, with a mean of € 2,420 during the whole observation period. The major cost driver (74%) was institutional care. The costs for people with dementia with Lewy bodies (€ 3,247 per MOS) were significantly higher than for people with Alzheimer disease (€ 1,855 per MOS). The most important cost-predicting factors we identified were the living situation, a diagnosis of non-Alzheimer disease, comorbidity, and daily living functioning. The use of cholinesterase inhibitors was related to lower costs. CONCLUSION: Formal care costs increased significantly over time with institutional care being the heaviest cost driver. Studies with longer observation periods will be necessary to evaluate the complete socioeconomic impact of the course of dementia.
Authors: Yingjia Chen; Leslie Wilson; John Kornak; R Adams Dudley; Jennifer Merrilees; Stephen J Bonasera; Christie M Byrne; Kirby Lee; Winston Chiong; Bruce L Miller; Katherine L Possin Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2019-06-04 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: A Rongve; H Soennesyn; Ragnhild Skogseth; Ragnhild Oesterhus; T Hortobágyi; Clive Ballard; B H Auestad; D Aarsland Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Christoph Mueller; Gayan Perera; Anto P Rajkumar; Manorama Bhattarai; Annabel Price; John T O'Brien; Clive Ballard; Robert Stewart; Dag Aarsland Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Date: 2017-12-27
Authors: Sabina Vatter; Kathryn R McDonald; Emma Stanmore; Linda Clare; Sheree A McCormick; Iracema Leroi Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 10.668