Zhizhong Zhang1, Gelin Xu1, Minmin Ma1, Jie Yang2, Xinfeng Liu3. 1. Department of Neurology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Jiangsu Province, China. 2. Department of Neurology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing, China. 3. Department of Neurology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Jiangsu Province, China. Electronic address: xfliu2@yahoo.com.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The association between dietary fiber intake and gastric cancer risk has been investigated by many studies, with inconclusive results. We conducted a meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies to analyze this association. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed and Embase through October 2012. We analyzed 21 articles, which included 580,064 subjects. Random-effects models were used to estimate summary relative risks. Dose-response, subgroup, sensitivity, meta-regression, and publication bias analyses were performed. RESULTS: The summary odds ratios of gastric cancer for the highest, compared with the lowest, dietary fiber intake was 0.58 (95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.67) with significant heterogeneity among studies (P < .001, I(2) = 62.2%). Stratified analysis for study design, geographic area, source and type of fiber, Lauren's classification, publication year, sample size, and quality score of study yielded consistent results. Dose-response analysis associated a 10-g/day increment in fiber intake with a significant (44%) reduction in gastric cancer risk. Sensitivity analysis restricted to studies with control for conventional risk factors produced similar results, and omission of any single study had little effect on the combined risk estimate. CONCLUSIONS: In a meta-analysis, we show that dietary fiber intake is associated inversely with gastric cancer risk; the effect probably is independent of conventional risk factors. The direction of the protective association of dietary fiber was consistent among all studies, but the absolute magnitude was less certain because of heterogeneity among the studies. Further studies therefore are required to establish this association.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The association between dietary fiber intake and gastric cancer risk has been investigated by many studies, with inconclusive results. We conducted a meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies to analyze this association. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed and Embase through October 2012. We analyzed 21 articles, which included 580,064 subjects. Random-effects models were used to estimate summary relative risks. Dose-response, subgroup, sensitivity, meta-regression, and publication bias analyses were performed. RESULTS: The summary odds ratios of gastric cancer for the highest, compared with the lowest, dietary fiber intake was 0.58 (95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.67) with significant heterogeneity among studies (P < .001, I(2) = 62.2%). Stratified analysis for study design, geographic area, source and type of fiber, Lauren's classification, publication year, sample size, and quality score of study yielded consistent results. Dose-response analysis associated a 10-g/day increment in fiber intake with a significant (44%) reduction in gastric cancer risk. Sensitivity analysis restricted to studies with control for conventional risk factors produced similar results, and omission of any single study had little effect on the combined risk estimate. CONCLUSIONS: In a meta-analysis, we show that dietary fiber intake is associated inversely with gastric cancer risk; the effect probably is independent of conventional risk factors. The direction of the protective association of dietary fiber was consistent among all studies, but the absolute magnitude was less certain because of heterogeneity among the studies. Further studies therefore are required to establish this association.
Authors: Haejin In; Marisa Langdon-Embry; Lauren Gordon; Clyde B Schechter; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Philip E Castle; M Margaret Kemeny; Bruce D Rapkin Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Dorothy A Kieffer; Brian D Piccolo; Maria L Marco; Eun Bae Kim; Michael L Goodson; Michael J Keenan; Tamara N Dunn; Knud Erik Bach Knudsen; Sean H Adams; Roy J Martin Journal: J Nutr Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Maia E W Morrison; Janine M Joseph; Susan E McCann; Li Tang; Hani M Almohanna; Kirsten B Moysich Journal: Nutr Cancer Date: 2019-05-16 Impact factor: 2.900