Literature DB >> 23567188

A framework for fit-for-purpose dose response assessment.

M E Bette Meek1, Michael Bolger, James S Bus, John Christopher, Rory B Conolly, R Jeffrey Lewis, Gregory M Paolini, Rita Schoeny, Lynne T Haber, Amy B Rosenstein, Michael L Dourson.   

Abstract

The NRC report Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment made several recommendations to improve chemical risk assessment, with a focus on in-depth chronic dose-response assessments conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The recommendations addressed two broad elements: improving technical analysis and utility for decision making. To advance the discussions in the NRC report, in three multi-stakeholder workshops organized by the Alliance for Risk Assessment, available and evolving risk assessment methodologies were considered through the development and application of case studies. A key product was a framework (http://www.allianceforrisk.org/Workshop/Framework/ProblemFormulation.html) to guide risk assessors and managers to various dose-response assessment methods relevant to a range of decision contexts ranging from priority setting to full assessment, as illustrated by case studies. It is designed to facilitate selection of appropriate methodology for a variety of problem formulations and includes a variety of methods with supporting case studies, for areas flagged specifically by the NRC committee for consideration--e.g., susceptible sub-populations, population variability and background. The framewok contributes to organization and communication about methodologies for incorporating increasingly biologically informed and chemical specific knowledge into dose-response analysis, which is considered critical in evolving fit-for-purpose assessment to address relevant problem formulations.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23567188     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  2 in total

1.  A Framework that Considers the Impacts of Time, Cost, and Uncertainty in the Determination of the Cost Effectiveness of Toxicity-Testing Methodologies.

Authors:  Paul S Price; Bryan J Hubbell; Shintaro Hagiwara; Greg M Paoli; Daniel Krewski; Annette Guiseppi-Elie; Maureen R Gwinn; Norman L Adkins; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 4.302

Review 2.  Advancing human health risk assessment: integrating recent advisory committee recommendations.

Authors:  Michael Dourson; Richard A Becker; Lynne T Haber; Lynn H Pottenger; Tiffany Bredfeldt; Penelope A Fenner-Crisp
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.635

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.