BACKGROUND: Treatment response in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) varies because of different genotypic and phenotypic characteristics. Results of clinical trials are based largely on aggregated estimates of treatment effect rather than individualized outcomes. This research assessed heterogeneity and differential treatment response using the subgroup identification based on differential effect search (SIDES) algorithm with data from a large multinational study. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the DURABLE trial, a randomized, open-label, two-arm, parallel study. The trial enrolled 2091 insulin-naïve T2DM patients aged 30 to 80 years. Patients received twice-daily insulin lispro mix 75/25 (LM75/25) or once-daily insulin glargine (insulin glargine). The SIDES methodology was used to find subgroups where the treatment effect was substantially different from what was observed in the full population of the clinical trial. A subgroup identification tool implementing the SIDES algorithm was used to examine data for 1092 patients (584 LM75/25 and 508 insulin glargine), achieving at-goal 12- or 24-week glycated hemoglobinA1c (A1C) (≤7.0%). RESULTS: The overall at-goal population treatment difference (A1C reduction) was not clinically meaningful, but a clinically meaningful difference was observed (A1C reduction 2.31% ± 0.06% LM75/25 versus 2.01% ± 0.07% insulin glargine; p = .001) in patients with a baseline fasting insulin level >11.4 μIU/ml and age ≤56 years. CONCLUSION: The observation that younger patients with higher levels of fasting insulin may benefit from a regimen that includes short-acting insulin targeting postprandial glycemia helps explain the heterogeneity in response and warrants further investigation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Treatment response in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) varies because of different genotypic and phenotypic characteristics. Results of clinical trials are based largely on aggregated estimates of treatment effect rather than individualized outcomes. This research assessed heterogeneity and differential treatment response using the subgroup identification based on differential effect search (SIDES) algorithm with data from a large multinational study. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the DURABLE trial, a randomized, open-label, two-arm, parallel study. The trial enrolled 2091 insulin-naïve T2DM patients aged 30 to 80 years. Patients received twice-daily insulin lispro mix 75/25 (LM75/25) or once-daily insulinglargine (insulinglargine). The SIDES methodology was used to find subgroups where the treatment effect was substantially different from what was observed in the full population of the clinical trial. A subgroup identification tool implementing the SIDES algorithm was used to examine data for 1092 patients (584 LM75/25 and 508 insulinglargine), achieving at-goal 12- or 24-week glycated hemoglobin A1c (A1C) (≤7.0%). RESULTS: The overall at-goal population treatment difference (A1C reduction) was not clinically meaningful, but a clinically meaningful difference was observed (A1C reduction 2.31% ± 0.06% LM75/25 versus 2.01% ± 0.07% insulinglargine; p = .001) in patients with a baseline fasting insulin level >11.4 μIU/ml and age ≤56 years. CONCLUSION: The observation that younger patients with higher levels of fasting insulin may benefit from a regimen that includes short-acting insulin targeting postprandial glycemia helps explain the heterogeneity in response and warrants further investigation.
Authors: Maureen I Harris; Catherine C Cowie; Ken Gu; Mildred E Francis; Katherine Flegal; Mark S Eberhardt Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2002 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.876
Authors: William H Herman; Kathleen M Dungan; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel; John B Buse; Jessie L Fahrbach; Honghua Jiang; Sherry Martin Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2009-03-10 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Goodarz Danaei; Mariel M Finucane; Yuan Lu; Gitanjali M Singh; Melanie J Cowan; Christopher J Paciorek; John K Lin; Farshad Farzadfar; Young-Ho Khang; Gretchen A Stevens; Mayuree Rao; Mohammed K Ali; Leanne M Riley; Carolyn A Robinson; Majid Ezzati Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Guy E H M Rutten; Cees J Tack; Thomas R Pieber; Abdurrahman Comlekci; David Dynnes Ørsted; Florian M M Baeres; Steven P Marso; John B Buse Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 3.320
Authors: Maja Rubinowicz-Zasada; Ewa Kucio; Anna Polak; Petr Stastny; Krzysztof Wierzbicki; Piotr Król; Cezary Kucio Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 3.390