Literature DB >> 23566987

An overview of Canadian and U.S. approaches to drug regulation and responses to postmarket adverse drug reactions.

Richard Y Cheung1, Sarah H Goodwin.   

Abstract

Over the years, drug products, including those indicated for diabetes, have been withdrawn from the marketplace because of quality concerns and/or severe adverse drug reactions. While the drug regulatory process is designed to detect, among other things, adverse drug reactions before a drug receives marketing authorization, for various reasons, premarket detection of all potential adverse reactions associated with a drug may not be possible. As such, regulatory authorities must also react to and manage adverse reactions identified at the postmarket stage. In this article, we provide a general overview of drug regulation in Canada and the United States and consider an example of a drug indicated for the treatment of diabetes and how newly identified potential safety concerns were managed in the postmarket environment.
© 2013 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23566987      PMCID: PMC3737630          DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  2 in total

Review 1.  From idea to market: the drug approval process.

Authors:  M S Lipsky; L K Sharp
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

2.  Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes.

Authors:  Steven E Nissen; Kathy Wolski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Empirical Study on the Transparency of Security Risk Information in Chinese Listed Pharmaceutical Enterprises Based on the ANP-DS Method.

Authors:  Jining Wang; Chong Guo; Tingqiang Chen
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.682

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.