Literature DB >> 23566675

Biomechanical loading of the shoulder complex and lumbosacral joints during dynamic cart pushing task.

Ashish D Nimbarte1, Yun Sun, Majid Jaridi, Hongwei Hsiao.   

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to quantify the effect of dynamic cart pushing exertions on the biomechanical loading of shoulder and low back. Ten participants performed cart pushing tasks on flat (0°), 5°, and 10° ramped walkways at 20 kg, 30 kg, and 40 kg weight conditions. An optoelectronic motion capturing system configured with two force plates was used for the kinematic and ground reaction force data collection. The experimental data was modeled using AnyBody modeling system to compute three-dimensional peak reaction forces at the shoulder complex (sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, and glenohumeral) and low back (lumbosacral) joints. The main effect of walkway gradient and cart weight, and gradient by weight interaction on the biomechanical loading of shoulder complex and low back joints was statistically significant (all p < 0.001). At the lumbosacral joint, negligible loading in the mediolateral direction was observed compared to the anterioposterior and compression directions. Among the shoulder complex joints, the peak reaction forces at the acromioclavicular and glenohumeral joints were comparable and much higher than the sternoclavicular joint. Increased shear loading of the lumbosacral joint, distraction loading of glenohumeral joint and inferosuperior loading of the acromioclavicular joint may contribute to the risk of work-related low back and shoulder musculoskeletal disorder with prolonged and repetitive use of carts.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23566675     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  7 in total

1.  The Effects of Ramp Gradients and Pushing-Pulling Techniques on Lumbar Spinal Load in Healthy Workers.

Authors:  Chalearmpong Pinupong; Wattana Jalayondeja; Keerin Mekhora; Petcharatana Bhuanantanondh; Chutima Jalayondeja
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2020-05-20

2.  Effects of asymmetrical stance and movement on body rotation in pushing.

Authors:  Yun-Ju Lee; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Influence of hooks and a lag screw on internal fixation plates for lateral malleolar fracture: a biomechanical and ergonomic study.

Authors:  Rina Sakai; Masataka Uchino; Terumasa Yoneo; Yasuaki Ohtaki; Hiroaki Minehara; Terumasa Matsuura; Tsutomu Gomi; Masanobu Ujihira
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 4.  Effectiveness of Biologic Factors in Shoulder Disorders.

Authors:  Dimitrios Giotis; Ashkan Aryaei; Theofanis Vasilakakos; Nikolaos K Paschos
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-02-28

Review 5.  Occupational Activities: Factors That Tip the Balance From Bone Accrual to Bone Loss.

Authors:  Mary F Barbe; Steven N Popoff
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 6.642

6.  Factors Affecting Material-Cart Handling in the Roofing Industry: Evidence for Administrative Controls.

Authors:  Zhenyu Zhang; Ken-Yu Lin; Jia-Hua Lin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Comparative Analysis of Optoelectronic Accuracy in the Laboratory Setting Versus Clinical Operative Environment: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bryan W Cunningham; Daina M Brooks
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.