Literature DB >> 23566493

Diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: meta-analysis.

Suhua Li1, Qiongqiong Ni, Huilan Wu, Long Peng, Ruimin Dong, Lin Chen, Jinlai Liu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to review the recent literatures on the diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice computed tomography angiography (CTA) for detection of coronary artery stenosis, with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the reference standard.
METHODS: A PubMed and EMBASE cross-search of the literatures on use of 320-slice CTA compared with ICA for detection of coronary artery stenosis, with publication date limited to January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2012. Individual and pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated at the patient-, vessel- and segment-level. A positive result was defined as greater than or equal to 50%-diameter stenosis.
RESULTS: A total of ten studies were included in the present meta-analysis, examining 1088 patients, 1629 vessels and 12,406 segments. The meta-analysis at the patient-level indicated a pooled sensitivity of 93% (95%CI: 91%-95%), specificity of 86% (95%CI: 82%-89%), PPV of 90% (95%CI: 87%-92%) and NPV of 90% (95%CI: 87%-93%). At the vessel-level, the pooled sensitivity was 92% (95%CI: 89%-94%), specificity 95% (95%CI: 94%-96%), PPV 87% (95%CI: 83%-90%), and NPV 97% (95%CI: 96%-98%). At the segment-level, the pooled sensitivity was 78% (95%CI: 76%-80%), specificity 98% (95%CI: 97%-98%), PPV 82% (95%CI: 80%-84%), and NPV 97% (95%CI: 97%-97%).
CONCLUSIONS: 320-CTA can effectively identify the majority of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The high NPV makes it as an effective noninvasive alternative to ICA for the exclusion of stenosis.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography angiography; Coronary artery disease; Diagnostic accuracy; Invasive coronary angiography; Meta-analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23566493     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  16 in total

Review 1.  CT angiography in the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease: a transformation in cardiovascular CT practice.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Mansour Al Moudi; Yan Cao
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-10

Review 2.  Coronary CT angiography: Diagnostic value and clinical challenges.

Authors:  Akmal Sabarudin; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-26

Review 3.  The Diagnosis of Chronic Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Christian Albus; Jörg Barkhausen; Eckart Fleck; Jörg Haasenritter; Oliver Lindner; Sigmund Silber
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Accuracy of computed tomography for selecting the revascularization method based on SYNTAX score II.

Authors:  Si Eun Lee; Kyunghwa Han; Jin Hur; Young Jin Kim; Hye-Jeong Lee; Yoo Jin Hong; Dong Jin Im; Byoung Wook Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Discrepancies between coronary CT angiography and invasive coronary angiography with focus on culprit lesions which cause future cardiac events.

Authors:  Junghoon Kim; Hyon Joo Kwag; Seung Min Yoo; Jin Young Yoo; In-Ho Chae; Dong-Ju Choi; Min-Jae Park; Mani Vembar; Eun Ju Chun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Impact of heart rate on diagnostic accuracy of second generation 320-detector computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Nitesh Nerlekar; Brian S Ko; Arthur Nasis; James D Cameron; Michael Leung; Adam J Brown; Dennis T L Wong; Philip J Ngu; John M Troupis; Sujith K Seneviratne
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

Review 7.  Diagnostic performance and comparative cost-effectiveness of non-invasive imaging tests in patients presenting with chronic stable chest pain with suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic overview.

Authors:  Claudia N van Waardhuizen; Marieke Langhout; Felisia Ly; Loes Braun; Tessa S S Genders; Steffen E Petersen; Kirsten E Fleischmann; Koen Nieman; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Diagnostic accuracy of prospectively gated, 128-slice or greater CTCA at high heart rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gordon T W Mander; Karen Dobeli; Caitlin Steffensen; Zachary Munn
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2021-07-07

Review 9.  Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for identification of ischemic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wen Wu; Dao-Rong Pan; Nicolas Foin; Si Pang; Peng Ye; Niels Holm; Xiao-Min Ren; Jie Luo; Aravinda Nanjundappa; Shao-Liang Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Diagnostic accuracy of coronary angiography using 64-slice computed tomography in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Fu-Bin Yang; Wan-Liang Guo; Mao Sheng; Ling Sun; Yue-Yue Ding; Qiu-Qin Xu; Ming-Guo Xu; Hai-Tao Lv
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.484

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.