Literature DB >> 23566131

Integrating care when the end is near: ethical dilemmas in end-of-life care.

Tziporah Rosenberg1, Jenny Speice.   

Abstract

An integrated and collaborative team provides the best clinical care of patients and families during end-of-life moments. Behavioral Health Clinicians (BHCs) bring a skill set for facilitating team interactions, attending to group process, as well as making space for the patient or family voice in the care, often with more time available for these roles. Through a case scenario, this article explores the relevant existing codes of ethics and professional conduct for professionals practicing in integrated care settings as they pertain to end-of-life transitions and care. Most notably, potential ethical issues pertaining to patient autonomy, scope of practice, confidentiality, multiple relationships, and record keeping all come to play during end-of-life care when practicing in an integrated primary care setting. Gaps in the existing codes are discussed and recommendations for providing ethically informed patient- and family-centered end-of-life care are suggested. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23566131     DOI: 10.1037/a0031850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Syst Health        ISSN: 1091-7527            Impact factor:   1.950


  1 in total

1.  Relational autonomy: what does it mean and how is it used in end-of-life care? A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature.

Authors:  Carlos Gómez-Vírseda; Yves de Maeseneer; Chris Gastmans
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 2.652

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.