Literature DB >> 23565889

Efficacy evaluation of percutaneous laser disc decompression in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.

Longxi Ren1, Han Guo, Tongtong Zhang, Zhengfeng Han, Linlin Zhang, Yanjun Zeng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and identify the relationship between PLDD efficacy and age. BACKGROUND DATA: Many articles have shown that the short-term clinical outcome of PLDD was fairly good. However, the continuous follow-up results over 3 years of PLDD for LDH treatment are rarely reported, and little is known about the relationship between PLDD efficacy and age.
METHODS: Forty-two LDH patients who had undergone PLDD with an Nd:YAG laser from July 2003 to August 2007, were divided into two groups according to age, with 19 cases in the ≤45-year-old age group and 23 cases in the >45-year-old group. All the patients were evaluated with the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) Scores before and after the PLDD to calculate the improvement rate of lumbar JOA scores, according to which the follow-up results were graded as excellent, good, fair, or poor.
RESULTS: Eighty affected discs in 42 patients were treated successfully with no complications in this study. The favorable outcomes of the 42 patients at 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-up were separately 45.24%, 66.67%, 71.43%, 76.19%, 80.95%, and 76.19%. The favorable outcome significantly improved from 45.24% at 1-month follow-up to 66.67% at 3-month (p<0.05). There was no significant difference of favorable outcome at 3-, 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-up (p>0.05).The preoperative lumbar JOA scores in two groups was not different (p>0.05), and no between-group differences were noted in favorable outcome at the same follow-up time (p>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcome of PLDD improved significantly within 3 months, and can maintain a higher level in 3 years. The efficacy of treatment with PLDD is fairly good for both selected younger and older patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23565889     DOI: 10.1089/pho.2012.3402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg        ISSN: 1549-5418            Impact factor:   2.796


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Kun Wang; Xin Hong; Bao-Yi Zhou; Jun-Ping Bao; Xin-Hui Xie; Feng Wang; Xiao-Tao Wu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparison of the ablation ability of nucleus pulposus after 1,064 nm Nd:YAG laser and 980 nm diode laser radiation.

Authors:  Jian Yin; Zhengfeng Han; Baofeng Guo; Han Guo; Tongtong Zhang; Yanjun Zeng; Longxi Ren
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-07-23

3.  One-year follow-up results of intradiscal diode laser, radiofrequency, and pulsed radiofrequency therapies: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Korgün Ökmen; Burcu Metin Ökmen
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 4.  Should anyone perform percutaneous endoscopic laser diskectomy and percutaneous lumbar disc decompressions?

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-12-26

5.  Comparison of percutaneous intradiscal ozone injection with laser disc decompression in discogenic low back pain.

Authors:  Poupak Rahimzadeh; Farnad Imani; Mohammad Ghahremani; Seyed Hamid Reza Faiz
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  Effectiveness of intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (DiscoGel®) versus percutaneous laser disc decompression in patients with chronic radicular low back pain.

Authors:  Masoud Hashemi; Payman Dadkhah; Mehrdad Taheri; Pegah Katibeh; Saman Asadi
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2020-01-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.