| Literature DB >> 23565805 |
Akadiri Yessoufou1, Joachim Gbenou, Oussama Grissa, Aziz Hichami, Anne-Marie Simonin, Zouhair Tabka, Mansourou Moudachirou, Kabirou Moutairou, Naim A Khan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Populations in Africa mostly rely on herbal concoctions for their primarily health care, but so far scientific studies supporting the use of plants in traditional medicine remain poor. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the anti-hyperglycemic effects of Picralima nitida (seeds), Nauclea latifolia (root and stem) and Oxytenanthera abyssinica (leaves) commonly used, in diabetic pregnancy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23565805 PMCID: PMC3637230 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-77
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Phytochemical composition of plants
| General test: Dragendorff reagent | +++ | - | +++ | ||
| Extraction: Mayer reagent | +++ | ++ | +++ | ||
| Saturation of Na acetate + a few drips of FeCl3, 1% | + | +++ | ++ | ||
| Stiasny reagent | - | - | +++ | ||
| Shinoda reagent (cyanidine reaction) | - | ++ | ++ | ||
| Adding some drips of HCl 5% to 1 mL of decocted + alcalinisation (with drips of ammoniac 50%) | - | + | + | ||
| Shinoda reagent (chlorhydric alcohol) | - | - | + | ||
| Born-Trager reaction | Concentrated HCl | ++ | + | - | |
| Diluted HCl | +++ | ++ | - | ||
| Foam index (FI) of diluted aqueous decoction (positive if FI ≥ 100, meaning foam height ≥ 1 cm) | +++ | - | + | ||
| (FI > 1 cm) | (FI < 1 cm) | (FI = 1 cm) | |||
| Liebermann-Buchard reaction (acetic anhydride-sulfuric acide 50 :1) | - | - | - | ||
| Kedde reaction (dinitrobenzoic acid 2% in ethanol + NaOH (1 N) 1:1) | - | - | +++ | ||
| RAYMOND reaction (Dinitrobenzene 1% in ethanol + NaOH 20%) | - | - | - | ||
| Grignard reaction (soaked paper with picric acid 5% | - | - | - | ||
| Viscosity study (in absolute ethanol) | +++ | ++ | - | ||
Chemical compounds of total brut extract of selected parts of plants. The phytochemical analysis was performed as described in Methods section. (+++) too high, (++) high (+) low: indicates the presence of the compounds in the plants; (−) indicates the absence of compound in plants.
Per cent of total fatty acid composition of plant extracts
| | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C14:0 | 0.0 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 3.6 ± 0.1* | 1.2 ± 0.09 | 8.0 ± 0.5* | 8.8 ± 0.5* | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.4 ± 0.7* | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| C16:0 | 23.8 ± 1.2 | 44.2 ± 2.6* | 51.4 ± 3.1* | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 36.3 ± 1.6* | 38.9 ± 4.0* | 22.9 ± 1.2 | 4.5 ± 0.6* | 54.9 ± 4.1* | 27.3 ± 1.2 | 40.5 ± 2.9* | 42.1 ± 3.9* | 29.9 ± 2.3 | 0.0* | 70.5 ± 4.9* |
| C18:0 | 7.4 ± 0.6 | 15.4 ± 1.5* | 12.5 ± 0.9* | 22.2 ± 1.9 | 38.6 ± 2.8* | 11.2 ± 0.8* | 4.4 ± 0.1 | 10.6 ± 1.2* | 6.8 ± 0.6 | 9.5 + 1.2 | 22.6 ±1.6* | 22.1 ± 1.7* | 10.2 ± 1.2 | 21.3 ± 2.1* | 13.4 ± 0.9 |
| C16:1 | 3.7 ± 0.9 | 19.9 ± 1.5* | 16.7 ± 0.8* | 13.0 ± 1.1* | 0.0* | 3.2 ± 0.1* | 2.8 ± 0.08 | 51.0 ± 3.5* | 12.0 ± 0.4* | 9.3 ± 0.5 | 29.6 ± 2.5* | 32.4 ± 0.9* | 27.0 ± 3.3 | 60.6 ± 5.7* | 16.1 ± 1.1* |
| C18:1 | 61.6 ± 1.9 | 13.0 ± 1.0* | 8.6 ± 0.4* | 17.4 ± 1.1* | 9.5 ± 0.7* | 5.7 ± 0.9* | 66.9 ± 1.6 | 22.4 ± 3.2* | 10.2 ± 0.9* | 52.0 + 3.8 | 5.5 ± 0.1* | 1.9 ± 0.09* | 32.9 ± 3.1 | 18.1 ± 1.0* | 0.0 |
| C18:2n-6 (LA) | ND | ND | ND | 16.5 ± 1.0 | 7.6 ± 0.9* | 15.9 ± 1.0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| C20:4n-6 (AA) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||||
| C18:3n-3 (LNA) | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 6.1 ± 0.9* | 7.1 ± 0.9* | 27.6 ± 2.5 | ND | 16.3 ± 1.1* | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 11.5 ± 1.6* | 12.8 ± 0.5* | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.05 | ND | ND | ND |
| C20:5n-3 (EPA) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| C22:6n-3 (DHA) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| ND | ND | ND | ND | ||||||||||||
Fatty acid compositions were determined as described in Methods section. Values are mean ± SEM. Each value represents the mean of three determinations. * p < 0.05 indicated significant differences as compared to Picralima nitida extract. ND = not detectable. MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids; SFA: saturated fatty acids; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acids.
Figure 1Glycemia in diabetic pregnant rats treated with plant extracts on day12 (A), day16 (B) and day21 (C) of gestation. Pregnant rats were rendered diabetic by administration of five low doses of streptozotocin, starting on day5 of gestation. Lyophilised plant extracts diluted in sterile physiological saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) were sterilized and filtrated [filter 0.20 μm (Nalge Nunc International Corp., USA)] and injected intraperitoneally to diabetic or control animals from day12 to day15 of gestation (four days). Values are mean ± SEM. (§) p < 0.01 = significant difference between diabetic rats compared with treated/untreated control animals. (*) p < 0.01 = significant difference between plant/insulin-treated diabetic rats compared with untreated diabetic animals. NS = non-significant difference. A: Picra-EtOH: ethanolic fraction of Picralima nitida; B: Picra-But: butaniolic fraction of Picralima nitida; C: Nauclea-EtOH: ethanolic fraction of Nauclea latifolia; D: Nauclea-But: butanolic fraction of Nauclea latifolia; E: Oxy-EtOH: butanolic fraction of Oxytenanthera abyssinica.
Figure 2Plasma vitamin C concentration in control and diabetic rats. Vitamin C concentration was determined in the plasma of the control and diabetic animals at delivery (day21). Values are mean ± SEM. (§) p < 0.01 = significant difference between diabetic rats compared with treated/untreated control animals. (*) p < 0.01 = significant difference between plant/insulin-treated diabetic rats compared with untreated diabetic animals. NS = non-significant difference. A: Picra-EtOH: ethanolic fraction of Picralima nitida; B: Picra-But: butaniolic fraction of Picralima nitida; C: Nauclea-EtOH: ethanolic fraction of Nauclea latifolia; D: Nauclea-But: butanolic fraction of Nauclea latifolia; E: Oxy-EtOH: butanolic fraction of Oxytenanthera abyssinica.
Figure 3Antioxidant capacity of plant extracts. Antioxidant capacity of plant extracts was determined in a solution of 1 mg/ml as described in the Materials and Methods section. Results are mean ± SEM. Each value represents the mean of three determinations.
Figure 4Vitamin C concentration in plant extracts. Vitamin C concentration was determined in a solution of 100 mg/ml of each extract as described in the Materials and Methods section. Results are mean ± SEM. Each value represents the mean of three determinations.
Figure 5Effects of plant extracts on T cell proliferation. Figure 5 shows the effects of plant extracts on human T cell proliferation. Each value represents the mean of six determinations. Values are the means ± SEM. (*) indicates significant difference compared with the only anti-CD3-stimulated cells (p < 0.01). NS = non-significant difference. Figure 5 insert shows the effects of different extracts at 20 μg/ml without stimulation by anti-CD3. Picra-EtOH: ethanolic fraction of Picralima nitida; Picra-But: butaniolic fraction of Picralima nitida; Nauclea-EtOH: ethanolic fraction of Nauclea latifolia; Nauclea-But: butanolic fraction of Nauclea latifolia; Oxy-EtOH: butanolic fraction of Oxytenanthera abyssinica; Picra-Aqos: aqueous fraction of Picralima nitida.