Literature DB >> 23565791

The SDT model of belief bias: complexity, time, and cognitive ability mediate the effects of believability.

Dries Trippas1, Simon J Handley, Michael F Verde.   

Abstract

When people evaluate conclusions, they are often influenced by prior beliefs. Prevalent theories claim that belief bias affects the quality of syllogistic reasoning. However, recent work by Dube, Rotello, and Heit (2010) has suggested that belief bias may be a simple response bias. In Experiment 1, receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that believability affected accuracy for complex but not for simple syllogisms. In Experiment 2, the effect of believability on accuracy disappeared when judgments were made under time pressure and with participants low in cognitive capacity. The observed effects on reasoning accuracy indicate that beliefs influence more than response bias when conditions are conducive to the use of certain reasoning strategies. The findings also underscore the need to consider individual differences in reasoning. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23565791     DOI: 10.1037/a0032398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  14 in total

Review 1.  When more data steer us wrong: replications with the wrong dependent measure perpetuate erroneous conclusions.

Authors:  Caren M Rotello; Evan Heit; Chad Dubé
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

2.  Beliefs and Bayesian reasoning.

Authors:  Andrew L Cohen; Sara Sidlowski; Adrian Staub
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

3.  Age-related differences in structural and functional prefrontal networks during a logical reasoning task.

Authors:  Maryam Ziaei; Mohammad Reza Bonyadi; David C Reutens
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.978

4.  Alleviating the concerns with the SDT approach to reasoning: reply to Singmann and Kellen (2014).

Authors:  Dries Trippas; Michael F Verde; Simon J Handley
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-19

5.  Modeling causal conditional reasoning data using SDT: caveats and new insights.

Authors:  Dries Trippas; Michael F Verde; Simon J Handley; Matthew E Roser; Nicolas A McNair; Jonathan St B T Evans
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-12

6.  Memory, reasoning, and categorization: parallels and common mechanisms.

Authors:  Brett K Hayes; Evan Heit; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-17

7.  Concerns with the SDT approach to causal conditional reasoning: a comment on Trippas, Handley, Verde, Roser, McNair, and Evans (2014).

Authors:  Henrik Singmann; David Kellen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-14

Review 8.  The neural correlates of belief bias: activation in inferior frontal cortex reflects response rate differences.

Authors:  Caren M Rotello; Evan Heit
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  The intersection between Descriptivism and Meliorism in reasoning research: further proposals in support of 'soft normativism'.

Authors:  Edward J N Stupple; Linden J Ball
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-05

10.  Fluency and belief bias in deductive reasoning: new indices for old effects.

Authors:  Dries Trippas; Simon J Handley; Michael F Verde
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.